Turn on thread page Beta
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    ...also consider nature's idea of a healthy parent's personality, energy, etc. homosexuality may be a warning sign to change, but may also be a gift when pursued as bisexuality can be an enjoyable lifestyle
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    fag

    oops im supposed to be pro gay ppl
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by caz)
    mental health is also a big clue. and while society may suggest personality may be anything, one knows that if a man believes he is a woman his whole life, this is unhealthy. consequently, if a woman believes she is a man, it is unhealthy. why? because it is not true. sexuality, however, goes much deeper, and when one entertains his sexual preferences, it is hard to believe it is unhealthy because it simply is. heterosexuality is NATURAL because procreation is the basis behind it, however pleasure is also important.

    to suggest your sexual preference as a homosexual is "normal" would be to say people who are attracted to little kids are normal, because it's just what gets them off. however, not being "normal" isn't necessarily bad, and in the case of me, i don't judge anyone, i just simply agree it is choice to pursue.

    people who lose their ego often meet their true self face to face. however, their ego also plays a role in affecting the true self, which is really the basis to its existence. sexuality is an expression of the ego, and yes this has been proven scientifically. you cannot masturbate with fantasy. ultimately it is your choice what you pursue in your fantasy, however, your ego/personality, perception on life, etc. affects what gets you aroused.

    neither is better, nor worse, but when someone has a healthy perception of truth (ie a man who believes he is a woman will remain restless and pursue transvestism) they act more "naturally", because the personality reflects beliefs, emotions, etc. (ego)

    this is also why people who develop amnesia come out with much different personalities, and often times different sexual preferences. people who build up lots of self-worth, love, attention, or need of, etc. can often times be homosexual (see the story of narcissus)

    people content in their self are more "healthy", personality wise, or truthful, and their sexuality usually reflects this

    again, neither is better nor worse, simply choice, whether conscious or not. dont let religion lie or judge you, things go deeper than they appear
    I'm atheist so religion isn't really a big thing for me.

    Also just checking did you seriously just say gay people are the same as pedophiles? I mean I understand you saying you arn't judgeing people but still sorta harsh thing to say.


    ok sorry if this post may seem a bit random, just working out things while I am typing. With relation to gays being unnatural I would have to disagree (probably expected I know), because even though hetrosexuals do reproduce it isn't like homosexuals don't have the capabilites, I mean we have endless posibilites. We can have surrogate mothers, adoption, we can donate to a sperm bank if we really wanted a child. homosexuality isn't unnatural because it has been in our society for so long, if it was really unnatural surely evolution would have taken it out of us by now? homosexuality fits with the society, therefore it hasn't needed to be taken out and therefore is natural if that line of thought made sense.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by emmz)
    maybe homosexuality is to keep the population down
    hm...that is certainly a possibility, it would still be something natural in our society therefore ^_^

    (hm..just noticing I'm saying therefore a lot)
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by emmz)
    maybe homosexuality is to keep the population down
    also possible but would seem to stem from a fear of society, privacy, SELF, etc. People who often lie a lot are homosexual. They develop a fear or hatred of other people/society, becoming self-conscious. Also, an unhealthy state to be a parent, and often times this type of anxiety or frustration can cause immune problems (which may be why AIDS is frequent in the homosexual culture, having to conceal their sexuality, and probably other things)

    Most cult leaders were homosexual

    No, not all homosexuals are like this, I wouldn't think. I don't know exactly, but many deny this, so who knows

    And, anyway, if it's to keep the population down, it would seem only reasonable there is a hate or fear involved somewhere in their beliefs, as all people develop a sexuality unless there is a bodily defect, so the reason being to procreate. If your sexuality (whose basis is of the EGO--also scientifically "proven") is homosexual, it would seem there is some hatred, or fear, or question somewhere in your beliefs, being homosexual would seem almost rebellious, whether unconscious or conscious.


    Again, I repeat I am not judging anyone, or anything, just giving psychological reasons. We do act unconsciously, we do exist unconsciously, so it would seem very ignorant to rule this out
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by darknessishope)
    <checks himself>
    If you really think about it the best think for everyone would be for everyone in the world to be bisexual.
    Difficult to say. What do you mean with the "best". I say let people be themselves. Thats usually the best.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by rahaydenuk)
    Troll. You really have no idea, do you? You can't condemn something, which someone else does when it is having no direct effect on anyone bar themselves. You have no grounds, on which to form an objection but your own excruciatingly narrow mind. As for your 'philasophical-science' [sic] point of view, I suggest you lookup the arts of science and philosophy because what you said is supported by neither.
    Where the hell do you get off telling me i have no idea??? You dont know me, you dont understand my POV so dont go speaking of things you dont know about!!!

    I suggest that you look up your own definition of science and philosiphy as i have studied both and the quote which is in my original post was from a philosiphy text book.

    Dont question the force. You have no knowledge.
    Let the force guide you.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    I think people are forgetting that if everyone was gay then procreation would not occur. If homosexuality was an intended sexuality them the human race would have died out thousands of years ago.
    Someone mentioned whether I was coming from a religious point of view. The answer is no, firstly as the quote i wrote was from a text book and not my own, and secondly it is totally irrelevant as to whether i am religious or not!
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by caz)
    also possible but would seem to stem from a fear of society, privacy, SELF, etc. People who often lie a lot are homosexual. They develop a fear or hatred of other people/society, becoming self-conscious
    that (and I can say this from personal experience) is complete and utter nonsense. You just gave a terrible stereotype with no backing to your claims. If you look at crime statistics you will see that most crimes arn't caused by homosexuals hating society, I mean please if you have evidence backing up this hypothesis show it me.

    (Original post by caz)
    And, anyway, if it's to keep the population down, it would seem only reasonable there is a hate or fear involved somewhere in their beliefs, as all people develop a sexuality unless there is a bodily defect, so the reason being to procreate. If your sexuality (whose basis is of the EGO--also scientifically "proven") is homosexual, it would seem there is some hatred, or fear, or question somewhere in your beliefs, being homosexual would seem almost rebellious, whether unconscious or conscious
    I'm not arguing about development of sexuality coming from ego, I'll agree with you ego plays a significant part in it. But your presuming that the ego is the person themselves. If you look at freud you will see we actually have 3 parts to us, the ID, the ego and the superego. Also you could make the argument that people are homosexual through socialisation, which would mean they arn't creating a deviant behaviour but are actually living up to what there norms and values have taught them, showing subordinance. Also if you look at rape statistics look at how many are hetrosexual and how many are homosexual, saying that homosexuals are all liers and deviants etc is all very good but again as I said before please show evidence before doing so.

    (Original post by caz)
    Again, I repeat I am not judging anyone, or anything, just giving psychological reasons. We do act unconsciously, we do exist unconsciously, so it would seem very ignorant to rule this out
    We do act unconsciously through our internal working models, but the nature/nurture debate is still going on. Also there are many other primary and secondary sources of socialisation affecting deviant behaviour with a person, it can't all be blamed on sexuality. It would be ignorant to say that as a human only one thing makes us what we are, we all have many different levels so therefore we all try to aim for different things.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by darknessishope)
    I'm atheist so religion isn't really a big thing for me.

    Also just checking did you seriously just say gay people are the same as pedophiles? I mean I understand you saying you arn't judgeing people but still sorta harsh thing to say.


    ok sorry if this post may seem a bit random, just working out things while I am typing. With relation to gays being unnatural I would have to disagree (probably expected I know), because even though hetrosexuals do reproduce it isn't like homosexuals don't have the capabilites, I mean we have endless posibilites. We can have surrogate mothers, adoption, we can donate to a sperm bank if we really wanted a child. homosexuality isn't unnatural because it has been in our society for so long, if it was really unnatural surely evolution would have taken it out of us by now? homosexuality fits with the society, therefore it hasn't needed to be taken out and therefore is natural if that line of thought made sense.
    I am not suggesting homosexuals are the same as pedophiles. I am suggesting they are both unnatural. Your very question suggests you do not like pedophiles, so I ask you, why judge pedophiles, when they claim they have no control over their sexual preference, while you are also claiming the same? To suggest homosexuality is normal, and pedophilia isn't would seem very bias.

    In fact, both involve many of the same situations: being sexually attracted to someone who cannot produce you offspring.

    And, anyway, I'm simply suggesting that anything other than heterosexual would be "unnatural" (natural meaning in the cycle of life), but not necessarily bad, nor good, just a condition. And, I do not believe in "homosexuals" and "heterosexuals". Nor "pedophiles". I simply believe in preference, which may involve health on the personal level, whether unconscious or conscious.

    Besides, some heterosexuals do go gay, while some homosexuals go straight. Likewise, some pedophiles can become nonpedophiles (though, I don't believe people become pedophiles, because pedophiles often involve many childhood "tragedies", which if you are not pedophile now, I see no reason why you would become one).

    It's just sexuality, not termanology to distinguish people. Every man is his own individual, and I believe sexuality is a reflection of the health of the EGO/personality.

    And, you can see the strange range of sexuality--fetishes, styles (some like it hardcore, some don't, while some people hate sex altogether--apparently it's "disgusting"). Also note some people like it in the backdoor, the frontdoor, their mouth, where ever it may be.

    Freud had a theory on this, as well. Coming up with like five basic ideas to the development of the personality. Here are the stages:

    The 5 Stages of Personality Development:

    Freud believed that there were 5 stages in the formation of your personality.

    Personality Formation

    1. Oral/Dependency

    If needs are not satisfied during this stage, one goes through life trying to meet them. Smoking, eating and drinking are seen as oral fixations. Recurring dreams and the feeling of incompleteness and unmet needs are common dreams.



    2. Anal/ Potty Training

    If not handled properly or if child is traumatized, then one might become anal retentive, controlling, rigid or develop obsessive compulsive behaviors. Dreams of being out of control or trying to keep things in order are common.

    3. Phallic

    Personality is fully developed by this stage. This stage is classified by the Oedipus and Electra Complexes. The Oedipus represents a male child's love for his mother and the fear/jealousy towards his father. The Electra is the female version where the female child has anger toward her mother and exhibits "penis envy".



    4. Latency



    5. Genital



    Freud believed that the motivating force of a dream, is wish fulfillment. Dreams may be a way to gratify oral fixations not fully met during the oral stage of Freud's personality formation. Or issues of power and control or struggles with love may manifest in dreams. Thoughts repressed during the day also have a way of being fulfilled in your dreams. Freud believed that every imagery and symbol that appears in a dream have a sexual connotation. Anxiety dreams were seen as a sign of repressed sexual impulses.

    In keeping with the Freudian school of thought, it may also be helpful to use free association as a way to derive the significance and meaning for a particular dream symbol.






    So, as you can see, sexuality has a lot to do with personality (or, the EGO, really). Without the EGO the body just simply acts on impulse, not fantasy, and therefore why the true nature of it can be developed. People who go through life with the criticism of other people, playing on the ego and people's emotions (note: someone thinking you are "out of character", or "fake", etc.) can develop "unnatural" sexual preferences, however, again, this is neither good nor bad. It's okay to have strange sexual preferences, it spices things up a bit. Most people do

    We are sexual creatures. Every single one of us are. Our entire life is composed of our sexuality, unless we are "too old" or "too young". This is what animals do, they have sex. But, we also do other things, as humans, and this is why it is not important to worry too much over your sexuality
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Excuse me if I'm being really bizarre, but, may I ask what this actually has to do with uni applications, schoolwork, etc etc, i.e. the intended purpose of this forum? We can do without mindless, clueless bigots like "mad caddie", who clearly thinks he's better than those who happen to be homosexual. Get a life for god's sake, there's more important things in life, and what the hell does it have to do with you anyway??
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Oh purleez..... how dare anyone place homosexuals in the same category as paedophiles. Homosexuality is about having a relationship between two consenting ADULTS. It doesn't hurt anyone whatsoever, whereas paedophilia clearly destroys children's lives, and involves having sex and fantasies about children who do not consent to sex. If a homosexual is to you an extremely bizarre occurence, then you really do need to get out and see the world, cos believe me, there are a lot "stranger" ppl out there.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by caz)
    So, as you can see, sexuality has a lot to do with personality (or, the EGO, really). Without the EGO the body just simply acts on impulse, not fantasy, and therefore why the true nature of it can be developed. People who go through life with the criticism of other people, playing on the ego and people's emotions (note: someone thinking you are "out of character", or "fake", etc.) can develop "unnatural" sexual preferences, however, again, this is neither good nor bad. It's okay to have strange sexual preferences, it spices things up a bit. Most people do

    We are sexual creatures. Every single one of us are. Our entire life is composed of our sexuality, unless we are "too old" or "too young". This is what animals do, they have sex. But, we also do other things, as humans, and this is why it is not important to worry too much over your sexuality
    ok I agree with you that ego development is important in sexual prefence, but you are ignoring many other factors. I mean I respect that you are trying to keep an unbias opinion in this and I thank you, it's rare people do. Unfortunatly I will be bias because this is very personal to me, hence why I sometimes do tend to ramble etc. I mean I still think it's natural, even for keeping the population down which is a very good thing for society.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mad Caddie)
    I think people are forgetting that if everyone was gay then procreation would not occur. If homosexuality was an intended sexuality them the human race would have died out thousands of years ago.
    Someone mentioned whether I was coming from a religious point of view. The answer is no, firstly as the quote i wrote was from a text book and not my own, and secondly it is totally irrelevant as to whether i am religious or not!
    maybe society was intended for both? one to help procreate and one to help make sure we don't over-populate. As you said if homosexuality was an intended sexuality then the human race would have died thousands of years ago, yet we still live and so do homosexuals, so maybe we are a natural part of society?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by darknessishope)
    that (and I can say this from personal experience) is complete and utter nonsense. You just gave a terrible stereotype with no backing to your claims. If you look at crime statistics you will see that most crimes arn't caused by homosexuals hating society, I mean please if you have evidence backing up this hypothesis show it me.
    Hate isn't necessarily violent. Fearing society is also a form of hatred, as it is mistrust. And that seems very stereotypical to say that hatred is the reason to all crime, let alone people who hate do commit crime.

    People are made to be in social groups. This is why we have language. It is part of our evolution. If you loved everyone in the group, and they all loved you, chances are you would be heterosexual if you acted freely--or bisexual. People who repress distort. Homosexuality is neither bad, nor good, nor a sin, nor this or that. It just simply is. I find it odd that most homosexuals enjoy the company of women.

    You can call me stereotypical, but I'm also going on statistics, and I also realize there are many "wildcards" in the mix, but we are generalizing, so don't bring up the idea of stereotyping, because you yourself as generalizing as well. If we were not generalizing, as a means to explaining the majority, it would seem very pointless to discuss at all.

    I'm simply going by psychology, biology, and nature. By the way, to suggest to yourself you are either homosexual or heterosexual seems in itself a stereotype...as you are only man who can speak for yourself; or even change your sexual preference (and no, don't give me this ******** that this is uncommon, because EVERYONE'S SEXUALITY is changing ALL the time, so don't tell me you're simply homosexual, because it is possible to be bisexual as well for anyone).

    Me and you are both men, so I'm speaking AS A HUMAN, and not as a heterosexual, or a homosexual, but with truth, and psychology. Being that the EGO is the basis to sexuality, and I've done lots of research on this, as well personal experience (bisexuality), I believe I can offer a pretty good idea to the plate--just in case you're thinking I know nothing

    (Original post by darknessishope)
    I'm not arguing about development of sexuality coming from ego, I'll agree with you ego plays a significant part in it. But your presuming that the ego is the person themselves. If you look at freud you will see we actually have 3 parts to us, the ID, the ego and the superego. Also you could make the argument that people are homosexual through socialisation, which would mean they arn't creating a deviant behaviour but are actually living up to what there norms and values have taught them, showing subordinance. Also if you look at rape statistics look at how many are hetrosexual and how many are homosexual, saying that homosexuals are all liers and deviants etc is all very good but again as I said before please show evidence before doing so.
    Also, heterosexuals are obviously viewing life differently if their EGO is being attracted to the opposite sex. So, you can't really compare statistics with both as being the same in any case, as WE HAVE NO ROOT CAUSE EVIDENCE FOR ANYTHING, only theory.

    And I never said all homosexuals are liars and "deviants"

    Stop putting words into my mouth. You have done this repeatedly in your replies, and you've only replied a couple times to me...so that's pretty bad. At least have some decency

    (Original post by darknessishope)
    We do act unconsciously through our internal working models, but the nature/nurture debate is still going on. Also there are many other primary and secondary sources of socialisation affecting deviant behaviour with a person, it can't all be blamed on sexuality. It would be ignorant to say that as a human only one thing makes us what we are, we all have many different levels so therefore we all try to aim for different things.
    A man has testicles, a woman ovaries. It seems pretty relevant to be "ignorant" with nature to me. If you have testicles, you're a man. If ovaries, a woman. If both, a hermaphrodite, but let's not get into THAT discussion

    Sexuality involves the genitals. I think it's pretty safe to say "one thing" makes us what we are. Your sexuality has nothing to do with what your body is, it's your psychology, guy.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by caz)
    I am not suggesting homosexuals are the same as pedophiles. I am suggesting they are both unnatural. Your very question suggests you do not like pedophiles, so I ask you, why judge pedophiles, when they claim they have no control over their sexual preference, while you are also claiming the same? To suggest homosexuality is normal, and pedophilia isn't would seem very bias.
    I'm sorry but comparing homosexuality and peadophilia is completely ignorant, insulting and not to mention down-right stupid. The difference is that most homosexuals, like most heterosexuals partake only in relationships with other consenting adults. In other words they are not forcing unconsenting minors into sexual relations (or worse). There exist heterosexual peadophiles just as there do homosexual peadophiles (in fact that majority of child abuse is adult male on young females). Peadophilia is a completely different thing altogether and exists across all sexualities. To try to imply that it should be classed along with homosexuality is beyond ignorance and stupidity. The difference lies in consent. If you can't see that, then I despair.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by musicman)
    Oh purleez..... how dare anyone place homosexuals in the same category as paedophiles. Homosexuality is about having a relationship between two consenting ADULTS. It doesn't hurt anyone whatsoever, whereas paedophilia clearly destroys children's lives, and involves having sex and fantasies about children who do not consent to sex. If a homosexual is to you an extremely bizarre occurence, then you really do need to get out and see the world, cos believe me, there are a lot "stranger" ppl out there.
    Okay, now how dare you say paedophiles are hurtful. Many of them do not act out their desires.

    They are both unnatural, they both involve the individual (sex involves the individual--hence why we masturbate), so you can't say "how dare you compare them" when your judging the act itself, rather than the truth of it. Okay, so a paedophile (also, not a "forced" sexual preference, an innate one like homosexuality) hurts children. If a child wanted to have sex with the adult out of curiousity, it is not hurting him. This nonetheless can be viewed as disgusting, as well as homosexuality.

    Both, bias opinions, although in the case of paedophilia, I choose to see it as something that needs to be changed because it in fact does hurt other people if used. I see a sexuality that's worth being expressed as containing two adults, both willing. This is just my view. Many people view it as being between both a man and a woman.

    All of it's bias unless you accept it all, and lean toward the healthiest outcome--which is why I believe homosexuality, though unnatural, is perfectly acceptable.

    Religion, which teaches judgement and hatred, however, can cause also stereotypical views in society when we look at people who do have bias opinions.
    You can be nonreligious and not accept homosexuality.

    EVERYTHING IS INDIVIDUAL, STOP JUDGING ALL NEGATIVITY AS BEING STEREOTYPICAL, BECAUSE THAT'S JUST AS IGNORANT AS REAL STEREOTYPING.

    In fact, I don't believe I'm being negative at all. You're just viewing my ideas as negative. I don't judge the psychology of a homosexual, do not judge mine.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by rahaydenuk)
    I'm sorry but comparing homosexuality and peadophilia is completely ignorant, insulting and not to mention down-right stupid. The difference is that most homosexuals, like most heterosexuals partake only in relationships with other consenting adults. In other words they are not forcing unconsenting minors into sexual relations (or worse). There exist heterosexual peadophiles just as there do homosexual peadophiles (in fact that majority of child abuse is adult male on young females). Peadophilia is a completely different thing altogether and exists across all sexualities. To try to imply that it should be classed along with homosexuality is beyond ignorance and stupidity. The difference lies in consent. If you can't see that, then I despair.
    You are being ignorant, sir.

    You saying a paedophile can be a homosexual or a heterosexual can be reversely argued. Take this into consideration before presenting your negativity toward paedophiles. I have compassion for paedophiles, as many of them do not act out their desires. You are suggesting all paedophiles engage in rape.

    In fact, many cultures view paedophilia as perfectly acceptable, and children willing engage in it as an act of love. I personally do not agree with this, but that's just me. Some people don't agree with homosexuality, so I don't judge them. My disagreement with paedophilia is just as ignorant as one with homosexuality.

    As I said, it can be argued reversely. A homosexual can be a paedophile, while a homosexual can also be attracted only to adults.

    They're both orientations. Sexuality is not so black and white as you're trying to make it out to be.

    OMG HE SAID PEOPLE WHO LIKE CHILDREN ARE LIKE PEOPLE WHO LIKE PEOPLE OF THE SAME SEX. Sir, sexuality invovles a preference. Whether gender, age, image, smell, object, feeling, whatever. YOU are being ignorant.

    Homosexuality is just as normal as paedophilia, and I am not saying homosexuals are to be hated, I am simply presenting your own ignorance as a means to arguing your judgement on other people's ignorance. You dislike paedophiles, while many cultures find it a joyous expression of love. Some people dislike homosexuality, while many people find it a joyous expression of love.

    Sexuality is not this or that, it simply is. And when it comes down to it, there is a "natural" norm, which is the argument altogether (is homosexuality normal?). No, it is not, because there can only be one norm, and this is obviously heterosexuality. Whether you choose to disagree with other sexual preferences, that is your choice. But don't be a hypocrite.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by caz)
    Hate isn't necessarily violent. Fearing society is also a form of hatred, as it is mistrust. And that seems very stereotypical to say that hatred is the reason to all crime, let alone people who hate do commit crime.
    again you're still stereotyping by presuming that homosexuals fear society.

    (Original post by caz)
    You can call me stereotypical, but I'm also going on statistics, and I also realize there are many "wildcards" in the mix, but we are generalizing, so don't bring up the idea of stereotyping, because you yourself as generalizing as well. If we were not generalizing, as a means to explaining the majority, it would seem very pointless to discuss at all.
    please show me these statistics, I really honestly would be interested in seeing them

    (Original post by caz)
    I'm simply going by psychology, biology, and nature. By the way, to suggest to yourself you are either homosexual or heterosexual seems in itself a stereotype...as you are only man who can speak for yourself; or even change your sexual preference (and no, don't give me this ******** that this is uncommon, because EVERYONE'S SEXUALITY is changing ALL the time, so don't tell me you're simply homosexual, because it is possible to be bisexual as well for anyone).
    caz you're a psychologist, you should know labelling theory by now. To say that we shouldn't give ourselves a sexual label (I know you didn't say that completely, that we are always changing but you implied it. If I am wrong please say) is impossible because we have to give ourselves labels to become part of a group. Social Interaction Theory helps explain this more.

    (Original post by caz)
    Me and you are both men, so I'm speaking AS A HUMAN, and not as a heterosexual, or a homosexual, but with truth, and psychology. Being that the EGO is the basis to sexuality, and I've done lots of research on this, as well personal experience (bisexuality), I believe I can offer a pretty good idea to the plate--just in case you're thinking I know nothing
    I actually think you know a lot about this subject, or I would have stopped this argument a while ago.

    (Original post by caz)
    Also, heterosexuals are obviously viewing life differently if their EGO is being attracted to the opposite sex. So, you can't really compare statistics with both as being the same in any case, as WE HAVE NO ROOT CAUSE EVIDENCE FOR ANYTHING, only theory.
    Actually that's wrong. We view things through stereotypes, and labelling theory plays a big part in this too. Also as I said before freud said we have 3 different parts to our internal working model, so you're also missing the superego and the ID.

    (Original post by caz)
    And I never said all homosexuals are liars and "deviants"

    Stop putting words into my mouth. You have done this repeatedly in your replies, and you've only replied a couple times to me...so that's pretty bad. At least have some decency
    For this I apologise, I hadn't realised I was putting words in your mouth and am sorry if I have. You did say though homosexuals usually turned out to be liars and fearing society, I was just wanting evidence to back up your claim.

    (Original post by caz)
    A man has testicles, a woman ovaries. It seems pretty relevant to be "ignorant" with nature to me. If you have testicles, you're a man. If ovaries, a woman. If both, a hermaphrodite, but let's not get into THAT discussion

    Sexuality involves the genitals. I think it's pretty safe to say "one thing" makes us what we are. Your sexuality has nothing to do with what your body is, it's your psychology, guy.
    I'm sorry I hadn't realised I said about my genitals playing a part in my sexuality.When did I say this?

    also I just got this link http://www.sciencenews.org/sn_arc97/1_4_97/bob1.htm

    it explains some theories behind homosexuality if you are interested.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    i wonder if there's a "part 2"
 
 
 
Poll
Is the Big Bang theory correct?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.