This discussion is now closed.

Check out other Related discussions

Invade North Korea.

Singapore calls on the UN to strongly criticise North Korea for its human rights abuses and calls on freedom loving countries to invade and liberate it. It is a threat to the far East and the world and must be crushed.

Who will be invading whom

Singapore will invade N. Korea with the support of the UN and troops from all freedom loving states.

What the reasons are for doing so

1) It is a brutal regime
2) It is a growing nuclear threat
3) Markets can be opened

Any ramifications not invading will have on the International Community

1) East Asia will contine to live in fear from this rouge state who no one can trust.
2) Many people have relatives in N. korea as well as hostages. These people should be freed. Oterwise what is the point of being a citizen of a state.

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

Bismarck

objectivism

On what grounds is Singapore calling for an offensive war? The United Nations Charter only permits war in self-defense and collective self-defense.

China would also wish to remind the international community that any actions taken against its neighbors without the express permission of the United Nations Security Council will be viewed as an act of aggression against China.

Reply 2

Narsha

invade and do what? kill innocent people already pressed?

Reply 3

objectivism

Bismarck

Is a nasty brutal regime which is becoming more of a threat everday as it continues developing nuclear weapons. We have a duty to people not brutal regimes. If the UN does not view a nuclear threat as sufficient the charter should be changed. Brutal regimes should be crushed.

Reply 4

tiantang

let me guess, they also have WMD's which will kill all in 45 mins.

Lets liberate the country by bombing the hell out of it. w00t.

Reply 5

objectivism

lovingbuzz

invade and do what? kill innocent people already pressed?

Casulaties of war, but freedom for future generations is more important. Too many generations have suffered.

Reply 6

Bismarck

objectivism

It is up to the people of each state to decide how they will be governed. If you wish to remain in the UN while encouraging acts of aggression, you should move to have the UN Charter changed. When the Security Council next convenes, put the issue up for debate.

Reply 7

objectivism

It is up to the people of each state to decide how they will be governed.

Exactly. I want them to have that chance.

If you wish to remain in the UN while encouraging acts of aggression,

Correction: liberation.

you should move to have the UN Charter changed. When the Security Council next convenes, put the issue up for debate.

When is this?

Reply 8

Beekeeper

objectivism

Is a nasty brutal regime which is becoming more of a threat everday as it continues developing nuclear weapons.

This is certainly debatable now, and we don't know for certain. Whilst i haven't read up on this hardly at all, we would strongly oppose any military action at this stage.

- UK

Reply 9

objectivism

Who represents North Korea?

Reply 10

Beekeeper

objectivism

Who represents North Korea?

thebucketwoman :redface:

Reply 11

objectivism

beekeeper_

thebucketwoman :redface:

Well lets definately invade.

Reply 12

Bismarck

objectivism

Exactly. I want them to have that chance.

It is not up to foreign actors to decide how the government of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is chosen.

Correction: liberation.

According to UN GA Resolution 3314::

Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.

When is this?

Make a thread right now, and ask it to be moved to a Security Council sub-forum once it is created.

FYI, the following countries are currently members of the SC:

Algeria
Argentina*
Benin
Brazil
China*
Denmark
France*
Greece*
Japan*
Philippines
Romania
Russian Federation*
United Kingdom*
United Republic of Tanzania
United States*

* = the country is currently represented in this Model UN

To pass a resolution in the SC, 3/5 of the SC members (5 out of 8 right now) have to vote for it and none of the 5 permanent member veto it.

Reply 13

objectivism

To pass a resolution in the SC, 3/5 of the SC members (5 out of 8 right now) have to vote for it and none of the 5 permanent member veto it

Would China veto it?
Perhaps its easier for Singapore to get funding for an invasion from global corporations with the promise of resources and markets for them. :smile:

Reply 14

Bismarck

objectivism

Would China veto it?

China retains the right to act in ways consistent with its obligations to its allies and to international law.

Perhaps its easier for Singapore to get funding for an invasion from global corporations with the promise of resources and markets for them. :smile:

That might be difficult considering that China is responsible for a larger portion of Singapore's exports than any other state in the world.

Reply 15

Person

Bismillah e Rahman e Rahim - Be naam e Khodaa

The Islamic Republic of Iran wishes to send its fraternal (but not Sororal) greetings to our comrades in the Democratic People's Republic of North Korea and pledge to further collaborate in the area of peaceful Nuclear Energy Production.

Reply 16

objectivism

Northumbrian

You lot might be next :smile:

Reply 17

Person

Can we have another revolution so I don't have to be a Mullah?

Reply 18

objectivism

Northumbrian

Can we have another revolution so I don't have to be a Mullah?

You arn't being Islamaphobic are you?

Reply 19

Phonicsdude

Mexico does not wish to commit itself to a costly war, which is not absolutely neccessary.

We have other priorities and difficulties internally, and will thus oppose the war.