This discussion is now closed.

Check out other Related discussions

Norrington Table 2005 here

Brown Patrick Bateman

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

RichE

Does anyone know when the official one is coming out?

Reply 2

Hoofbeat

is this the official one or not?! Damn poor Lincoln...we've fallen loads of places!!!! Oh well my year have got loads of distinctions, so when it's our finals we'll probably do damn good!

Reply 3

RichE

Hoofbeat

is this the official one or not?! Damn poor Lincoln...we've fallen loads of places!!!! Oh well my year have got loads of distinctions, so when it's our finals we'll probably do damn good!

I doubt it's official - I think it's one Oxforddata have produced.

Are all the results even out yet? Or just the vast majority?

Reply 4

Clodagh

Meh! *shoves Corpus up the list*

Reply 5

Woostarite

I'm surprised how 'unfixed' the table is each year - apart from a couple of frontrunners, the table couldn't be much more different to last year.

Reply 6

bigjcoool

OK. Cam someone explain how this works? Clearly they aren't percentages, and are these based solely on Finals results? So many questions! So much confusion.

Johnny

Reply 7

RichE

bigjcoool

OK. Cam someone explain how this works? Clearly they aren't percentages, and are these based solely on Finals results? So many questions! So much confusion.

Johnny

you get 5 for a first, 3 for a 2.1, 2 for a 2.2, 1 for a third, 0 for a pass

then the percentage is how much a college got out of the possible max from their students

but I doubt this is official - there are a lot of people have their names omitted from the list so this won't be complete.

The last year's positions aren't even from the revised table that became available last year

Reply 8

Font

Chassez

http://www.oxforddata.com/results/norrington.gif

omgwtf..LMH is going downhill :frown:

Reply 9

Ellie4

Go Hertford :biggrin:

Reply 10

Clodagh

The article in the Times also said that LMH and Harris Manchester, "both of which only admit mature students" Errmmm...no. That would just be HM..!

Reply 11

RichE

Clodagh

The article in the Times also said that LMH and Harris Manchester, "both of which only admit mature students" Errmmm...no. That would just be HM..!

It says "LHM and HM, which admits only mature students,..." - so it is correct, even if it could have been less ambiguously phrased.

Reply 12

zoraster

RichE

It says "LHM and HM, which admits only mature students,..." - so it is correct, even if it could have been less ambiguously phrased.

I suppose that's one argument for the comma before "and," as ugly as it looks.

Reply 13

zoraster

Hoofbeat

is this the official one or not?! Damn poor Lincoln...we've fallen loads of places!!!! Oh well my year have got loads of distinctions, so when it's our finals we'll probably do damn good!

Yes. Come join LMH.

Anyway, with the amount of movement on this table, wouldn't it be more effective if the table evaluated results across the past 10 years? It'd both make fluke down-years and fluke good-years have less impact, but it would allow for improvement.