Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • PS Helper
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    PS Helper
    I have a weird problem with this.

    In the MEI June 2009 paper, question 3(i)
    it says P(Z<0.2222) = 0.5878. But this is P(Z<0.222) isn't it? So does this mean that they are simply rounding 0.2222 to 0.222?

    If that's true, then why, in the Jnauary 2009 paper, question 3(i) (3(i) again:woo: !!) we get P(Z<0.2146) = 0.5849?

    Because P(Z<0.215) = 0.5851. So it's only NOT rounded like in the June 2009 paper.

    Not to mention the tables we get ONLY GO UP TO 3 DECIMAL PLACES .

    To get P(Z<0.2146), did they just look inbetween P(Z<0.214) and P(z<0.215)? It just seems ridiculous. There's no cosistency at all. Will we lose marks if we round? What's going on?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Tallon)
    I have a weird problem with this.

    In the MEI June 2009 paper, question 3(i)
    it says P(Z<0.2222) = 0.5878. But this is P(Z<0.222) isn't it? So does this mean that they are simply rounding 0.2222 to 0.222?

    If that's true, then why, in the Jnauary 2009 paper, question 3(i) (3(i) again:woo: !!) we get P(Z<0.2146) = 0.5849?

    Because P(Z<0.215) = 0.5851. So it's only NOT rounded like in the June 2009 paper.

    Not to mention the tables we get ONLY GO UP TO 3 DECIMAL PLACES .

    To get P(Z<0.2146), did they just look inbetween P(Z<0.214) and P(z<0.215)? It just seems ridiculous. There's no cosistency at all. Will we lose marks if we round? What's going on?
    lok spolier.
    Spoiler:
    Show
    MEOW!!:rofl2:
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    i think it's because around z<0.2222 a change of 0.0002 is negligible (i.e. gives such a low probability it rounds to the same value for 0.222 and 0.2222. But at higher z values the change in the probability is more sensitive due to the shape of the distribution (i.e. more data centred at the middle in a normal distribution), and for this reason a small change in z values has an effect on the probability value.

    That's my hunch
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    No calculator ?
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    i think it's because around z<0.2222 a change of 0.0002 is negligible (i.e. gives such a low probability it rounds to the same value for 0.222 and 0.2222. But at higher z values the change in the probability is more sensitive due to the shape of the distribution (i.e. more data centred at the middle in a normal distribution), and for this reason a small change in z values has an effect on the probability value.

    That's my hunch
    This sounds very reasonable but I reckon you're giving the exam board too much credit - bet it was just an inconsistancy in their answers! In the exam if you're using the tables then you can only give the answer to the degree of accuracy that you've got... When I did it, I was told to write stuf like P(Z<0.215) = 0.5851 (from tables to 3 d.p.) so that they knew exactly where I'd got the result from!
    • PS Helper
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    PS Helper
    (Original post by Neofytos)
    No calculator ?

    can't do it via calculator can you?
    • PS Helper
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    PS Helper
    (Original post by spread_logic_not_hate)
    This sounds very reasonable but I reckon you're giving the exam board too much credit - bet it was just an inconsistancy in their answers! In the exam if you're using the tables then you can only give the answer to the degree of accuracy that you've got... When I did it, I was told to write stuf like P(Z<0.215) = 0.5851 (from tables to 3 d.p.) so that they knew exactly where I'd got the result from!

    but the markscheme is doing it to 4dp, so what should I do?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Tallon)
    can't do it via calculator can you?
    P(Z<0.222)=0.58784
    P(Z<0.2222)=0.58792

    There is a big range for those values and you SHOULD always give ur final answer to 3 significant figures so for both 222 and 2222 answer is 0.588
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    There is a big range for those values and you SHOULD always give ur final answer to 3 significant figures so for both 222 and 2222 answer is 0.588
    3s.f. is the way forward.
    • PS Helper
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    PS Helper
    (Original post by spread_logic_not_hate)
    3s.f. is the way forward.

    but the other probably I mentioned would round to two different sf wouldn't it?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Tallon)
    but the other probably I mentioned would round to two different sf wouldn't it?
    Tallon,dont be worried about these. Mark schemes give very high range,so "Baby dont worry,.."
 
 
 
Poll
Do you agree with the PM's proposal to cut tuition fees for some courses?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.