You are Here: Home >< Maths

# M2 restitution Question watch

1. Particles A, B and C of masses 4m, 3m and m respectively, lie at rest in a straight horizontal plane with B between A and C. Particles A and B are projected towards each other with speeds and respectively, and collide directly.

As a result of the collision, A is brought to rest and B is rebounded with speed . The coefficient of restitution between A and B is .

a) Show that u = 3v. (6)

b) Find the value of k. (2)

Immediately after the collision between A and B, particle C is projected with speed towards B so that B and C collide directly.

c) Show that there is no further collision between A and B. (4)
My workings so far (Diagrams are attatched):

a)
Conservation of momentum:

Newton's Law of Restitution:

Now I am unsure as to what I can do next??

b)

c)
Conservation of momentum:

Again I am unsure as to what I do next?? It's obvious that B won't collide with A again as B will keep moving in the same direction after hitting C but I can't see how to show that??
Attached Images

2. (Original post by JamesyB)
Newton's Law of Restitution:

Now I am unsure as to what I can do next??
I think you are misunderstanding the law of restitution. It relates to speed (as you said above) not momentum (as you used below it).

You can also divide your momentum equations through by m as it's the same value for all of them. This will leave you with some simultaneous equations which you should be able to solve.

(Original post by JamesyB)
c)
Conservation of momentum:

Again I am unsure as to what I do next?? It's obvious that B won't collide with A again as B will keep moving in the same direction after hitting C but I can't see how to show that??
Don't know if it's the most elegant solution, but if you use restitution as in part a (using e), and solve simultaneously again, you should get a speed of B after the collision (in terms of v and e). The condition this velocity needs to satisfy is (taking away from a as positive) . If you find it in terms of v and e, and use e as , it should be clear this is positive (you'll see what I mean if you get it)

Sorry if that's not too clear. If you need a more explanation on part of it, ask.
3. (Original post by gcseeeman)
I think you are misunderstanding the law of restitution. It relates to speed (as you said above) not momentum (as you used below it).

You can also divide your momentum equations through by m as it's the same value for all of them. This will leave you with some simultaneous equations which you should be able to solve.

Don't know if it's the most elegant solution, but if you use restitution as in part a (using e), and solve simultaneously again, you should get a speed of B after the collision (in terms of v and e). the condition this speed needs to satisfy is (taking away from a as positive) . If you find it in terms of v and e, and use e as , it should be clear this is positive (you'll see what I mean if you get it)

Sorry if that's not too clear. If you need a more explanation on part of it, ask.
Ah cheers, mechanics is really not my strong point haha.

Got both parts now

### Related university courses

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: January 24, 2010
Today on TSR

### Top unis in Clearing

Tons of places at all these high-ranking unis

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams