(Original post by j4mes_bond25)
Wow, seems like I'm doing enough to raise your hackles, am I
making you lose a grip on a coherent argument.
You're either misreading or lying in order to make it look like you're getting somewhere. Since I've laid out my points in list form, there is little grounds for syntactic confusion. I must therefore assume the latter.
Well, arguing about something as ludicrous, as businesses moving their operation abroad, is accepting there's no existence of "common market".
Huh? I think your own ignorance is showing though, of course where you meant "common market" (a EU trading bloc) I think you meant Free Market. I'm a bit confused here, since I don't remember denying the existance, or benefits of liberalised labour flow. Are you arguing for a totally free market, with a totally free flow of labour? This isn't a part of multiculturalism, by the way.
It's a world of competition. People take their business & skills whereever they think they'll get the best returns out of it.
I think it was you who once proved your lack of intelligence, by suggesting as WHY don't Indians use their skills WITHIN their own country, gives a clear indication of your under-developed brain cells, bearing in mind that you FAILED to reply sensibly with a more coherent argument as why British people possessing the same skill prefer moving to Australia & USA, RATHER THAN using their skill WITHIN their OWN country
I never questioned "WHY don't Indians use their skills WITHIN their own country". Please provide some substantiation, or I must assume you are lying again. Knock off the weak personal insults, it makes you look like the dunce.
You failed to notice that multiculturism is good, as it provides the RIGHT people to do right job, something the "indegenious" people lacks, I fear.
You seem to not have noticed that I've already pointed out on several occasions that the US DOES NOT practice the NuLab/3rd Way concept of "Multiculturism[sic]", thus invalidating subsequent points. Any of these may be wrong; if you think so, please try and refute them.
Please substantiate your claim that multiculturalism "provides the RIGHT people to do right job[strike]" in Britain. I imagine this would be hard to do, since multiculturalism isn't an immigration policy, but something applied to citizens. Are you suggesting that citizenship is more attractive than visa, and citizenship without assimilation is more attractive? - That makes sense, but what are you basing it on?
Don't bother comparing Indians with other ethnic group, as I presume British white wouldn't fancy being compared with French or German, merely cos they share the same skin colour
Since when did skin colour come into it? I think you're - once again - having to resort to silly little slurs (implicitly calling me a racist) in order to make it look like you have a leg to stand on. Obvious differences do exist between Sillicon Valley Indians and, say, Ethiopian asylum seekers in Britain, and if those differences are relevant, they should be brought into the discussion. The differences, as I've already pointed out, involve skills, motivation, social class and the economy and country they are operating within.
Need I say more OR would you rather fancy zipping your lips now
Bottom line: If you disagree with my points, please explain, rather than beginning a barrage of vulgarity. If you feel your personal attacks are justified, please explain them, too.