Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Hey, I've ben attempting some D2 (a bit unsucessfully, I say ashamedly), and I stumbled across this question which I can make neither head nor tail of (even with the answer)

    the question is (for those of you with books, MEI D2/C Ex. 4E Q.7)

    Express the proposition p \Rightarrow q using only p, \ q, ~ and \land

    I have literally no idea how to go about this...

    Apparently the answer is ~  (p \land ~ q ) . Can someone please explain to me how this is equivalent?

    EDIT: I've just drawn up a truth table, and I can see why this is equivalent (well, I can see that it IS equivalent, but I don't understand WHY this is the case?). And how would I get from the first one to the second one?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Using my Logic taught in Computing.

    From the answer:

    If p is false, then the statement is always true (False AND something is always false, and the negation of False is true - thus the statement is true).
    If p is true, then you have two cases:
    q is true, in which case ~q is false and the entire thing evaluates to true.
    q is false, in which case the entire thing is false.

    This should agree with the definition of 'implies' (that, False => Anything is always true, and True => B is B).

    I hope this helps.
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    13
    Study Helper
    (Original post by foolsihboy)
    Hey, I've ben attempting some D2 (a bit unsucessfully, I say ashamedly), and I stumbled across this question which I can make neither head nor tail of (even with the answer)

    the question is (for those of you with books, MEI D2/C Ex. 4E Q.7)

    Express the proposition p \Rightarrow q using only p, \ q, ~ and \land

    I have literally no idea how to go about this...

    Apparently the answer is ~  (p \land ~ q ) . Can someone please explain to me how this is equivalent?

    EDIT: I've just drawn up a truth table, and I can see why this is equivalent (well, I can see that it IS equivalent, but I don't understand WHY this is the case?). And how would I get from the first one to the second one?
    If you consider, when is p \Rightarrow q ever false? There is only one combination of truth values for p,q where this is the case.

    Then you just negate it to find when p \Rightarrow q is true.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Brexit voters: Do you stand by your vote?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Write a reply...
    Reply
    Hide
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.