This discussion is now closed.
Check out other Related discussions
- Watched threads not working
- UCAT booking dates
- What Unis should I apply to for medicine?
- A100 Medicine for International Students 2025 Entry
- 2025 entry A100 / A101 Medicine fastest and slowest offer senders
- Old A Level Special Papers in Mathematical Subjects and Physics
- Which med schools ARE GCSE-heavy?
- Kings College London - 2:2 Grad Entry Medicine
- Interview
- UCAT
- Why hasn't Student Finance check my evidence today which is 20th September?
- UK medical school 2024 entry interview format
- .
- Retaking a levels for med
- Kinda stressing about medicine
- medicine at aberdeen
- Failed Year 3 Medicine
- Postgraduate January Start- Accommodation
- Header not always collapsing on mobile to the point where it blocks key content
- MOJ pre employment checks
Old Threads: Please Check Dates Before Replying
Recently we have seen an increase in the number of threads which have been brought back up the board from around July, August time - when the thread is effectively dead, and it would be more effective to start a new one.
When these threads appear, after being bumped back up, can I please urge other members not to go straight to replying to the most recent reply, but indeed check the date (and relevence) of the thread.
Things such as "What were your GCSE results?" were clearly for in and around August 21st 2003, and have little purpose now.
Key give aways folks, are threads which say they have been started by Unregistered (!).
Lets use a little bit of common sense please.
Our jobs are already difficult enough.
Expression
On behalf of the Moderation Team
When these threads appear, after being bumped back up, can I please urge other members not to go straight to replying to the most recent reply, but indeed check the date (and relevence) of the thread.
Things such as "What were your GCSE results?" were clearly for in and around August 21st 2003, and have little purpose now.
Key give aways folks, are threads which say they have been started by Unregistered (!).
Lets use a little bit of common sense please.
Our jobs are already difficult enough.
Expression
On behalf of the Moderation Team
Scroll to see replies
Expression
Recently we have seen an increase in the number of threads which have been brought back up the board from around July, August time - when the thread is effectively dead, and it would be more effective to start a new one.
When these threads appear, after being bumped back up, can I please urge other members not to go straight to replying to the most recent reply, but indeed check the date (and relevence) of the thread.
Things such as "What were your GCSE results?" were clearly for in and around August 21st 2003, and have little purpose now.
Key give aways folks, are threads which say they have been started by Unregistered (!).
Lets use a little bit of common sense please.
Our jobs are already difficult enough.
Expression
On behalf of the Moderation Team
When these threads appear, after being bumped back up, can I please urge other members not to go straight to replying to the most recent reply, but indeed check the date (and relevence) of the thread.
Things such as "What were your GCSE results?" were clearly for in and around August 21st 2003, and have little purpose now.
Key give aways folks, are threads which say they have been started by Unregistered (!).
Lets use a little bit of common sense please.
Our jobs are already difficult enough.
Expression
On behalf of the Moderation Team
i second, and carried!
Expression
Recently we have seen an increase in the number of threads which have been brought back up the board from around July, August time - when the thread is effectively dead, and it would be more effective to start a new one.
When these threads appear, after being bumped back up, can I please urge other members not to go straight to replying to the most recent reply, but indeed check the date (and relevence) of the thread.
Things such as "What were your GCSE results?" were clearly for in and around August 21st 2003, and have little purpose now.
Key give aways folks, are threads which say they have been started by Unregistered (!).
Lets use a little bit of common sense please.
Our jobs are already difficult enough.
Expression
On behalf of the Moderation Team
When these threads appear, after being bumped back up, can I please urge other members not to go straight to replying to the most recent reply, but indeed check the date (and relevence) of the thread.
Things such as "What were your GCSE results?" were clearly for in and around August 21st 2003, and have little purpose now.
Key give aways folks, are threads which say they have been started by Unregistered (!).
Lets use a little bit of common sense please.
Our jobs are already difficult enough.
Expression
On behalf of the Moderation Team
i got very confused.When lh went to cyprus in september and someone bought it back up i replied thinking he was going that day
eric bischoff
are mods listening.It is time to do something useful
Alright. He's gone. I got rid.
Tidy up operation to begin.
Bigcnee
Only if the moderation team are more careful about deleting "new" threads.
If thats a threat youth, then I'll get rid of you at the same time.
lou p
I have a question here... if a mod deleted the spamming post, would the the thread drop boack down the list again?
lou xxx
lou xxx
Yes back down to the hellish place it came from !
Related discussions
- Watched threads not working
- UCAT booking dates
- What Unis should I apply to for medicine?
- A100 Medicine for International Students 2025 Entry
- 2025 entry A100 / A101 Medicine fastest and slowest offer senders
- Old A Level Special Papers in Mathematical Subjects and Physics
- Which med schools ARE GCSE-heavy?
- Kings College London - 2:2 Grad Entry Medicine
- Interview
- UCAT
- Why hasn't Student Finance check my evidence today which is 20th September?
- UK medical school 2024 entry interview format
- .
- Retaking a levels for med
- Kinda stressing about medicine
- medicine at aberdeen
- Failed Year 3 Medicine
- Postgraduate January Start- Accommodation
- Header not always collapsing on mobile to the point where it blocks key content
- MOJ pre employment checks
Latest
Trending
Last reply 2 weeks ago
Rachel Reeves did the right thing in ending winter fuel paymentsLast reply 1 month ago
Should the UK introduce a mandatory working gap year for 18-year olds?Last reply 1 month ago
Russell Group universities are actually very good. We should stop dismissing them.
