Turn on thread page Beta
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Tek)
    They should really interview fewer candidates.
    Here here.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    My phil teacher said it's possible to do a philosophy Ph.D in Occultism
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mentally Ill)
    Yep. The only thing is, that you can buy books from a philosophy bookstore to refine your thinking skills. If all canditates did this, then there would just be no point cos theyd be back to square one.
    But it takes a while for the applicants to catch on So they have a few years to figure out a new test then, or slap on more tests.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lizzzy`)
    But it takes a while for the applicants to catch on So they have a few years to figure out a new test then, or slap on more tests.
    well i spose theres no real test or interview that can be 100% foolproof!
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by al65)
    I heard cambridge were really good in that they gave u an interview even with really low scores e.g 3.0.

    Oxford rejected people if your results were av/ less than av even b4 interview
    I was told that Clare rejected people without interview, based upon BMAT results.

    Cambridge has that age-old thing of trying to interview all applicants, but in reality less are interviewed ~90%?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    If you have less than AABB at AS don't think it's really worth interviewing you unless your results are due to mitigating circumstances.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lizzzy`)
    I was told that Clare rejected people without interview, based upon BMAT results.

    Cambridge has that age-old thing of trying to interview all applicants, but in reality less are interviewed ~90%?
    well at least that makes us feel good for reaching the interview stage!
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Tina)
    well i spose theres no real test or interview that can be 100% foolproof!
    Nah. This sounds weird, but it just occured to me that in 100 years' time they could be selecting based on genetic sequence, i.e. so-called 'more intelligent' DNA sequence vs. the lesser ones.
    But that's rubbish
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Seer)
    If you have less than AABB at AS don't think it's really worth interviewing you unless your results are due to exceptional circumstances.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lizzzy`)
    I was told that Clare rejected people without interview, based upon BMAT results.

    Cambridge has that age-old thing of trying to interview all applicants, but in reality less are interviewed ~90%?
    Its coz more and more ppl are applying as more and more are getting good a-level results. they simply dont have the time to interview everyone

    They'll probably try to interview 30% applicants like oxford for medicine in a few yrs (if they can bear to go against that age-old promise of theirs)
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Tina)
    well at least that makes us feel good for reaching the interview stage!
    We can only wait and see...
    Reading other threads, Oxford slashed a lot of applicants this year w/o interview!
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lizzzy`)
    Nah. This sounds weird, but it just occured to me that in 100 years' time they could be selecting based on genetic sequence, i.e. so-called 'more intelligent' DNA sequence vs. the lesser ones.
    But that's rubbish
    What about the "hard work" factor?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lizzzy`)
    Nah. This sounds weird, but it just occured to me that in 100 years' time they could be selecting based on genetic sequence, i.e. so-called 'more intelligent' DNA sequence vs. the lesser ones.
    But that's rubbish
    ye ur right...they might well do that in the future bcoz it will be seen as totally scientific and unbiased.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lizzzy`)
    But it takes a while for the applicants to catch on So they have a few years to figure out a new test then, or slap on more tests.
    Yes, I think that far too much rests upon whether the interviewer likes the interviewee. I understand that this is important as they will be having supervisions together but I think they'd be better off just putting names of all possbibles in a hat. This might actually help them with their 'widening access' initiatives. People could hardly accuse them of choosing a specific 'type' of candidate.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Tek)
    They should really interview fewer candidates.
    I think, in the recent past, they had an average of 3 applicants to every place and it was easy to pick those who they wanted. Now, with Access initiatives (which I think are great, incedentally) they are having to cope with far more interviews for the same number of places as they haven't expanded as other unis have.
    They don't interview all applicants who apply, only those who are of sufficient potential, but with grade inflation it's a growing problem. Perhaps when top-up fees have increased to £10,000 pa they will have a lot fewer applicants!
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by al65)
    Its coz more and more ppl are applying as more and more are getting good a-level results. they simply dont have the time to interview everyone

    They'll probably try to interview 30% applicants like oxford for medicine in a few yrs (if they can bear to go against that age-old promise of theirs)
    Oxford don't have that promise, only Cam, I think.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Tek)
    What about the "hard work" factor?
    it might just be a "factor" but not the key one.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Tek)
    What about the "hard work" factor?
    Eventually the playing field will be levelled. Everyone can work hard, but not everyone will get a place.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by yawn1)
    Perhaps when top-up fees have increased to £10,000 pa they will have a lot fewer applicants!
    It would bring them inline with US colleges at least.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lizzzy`)
    Oxford don't have that promise, only Cam, I think.
    yep...only cambridge.

    I know someone with 8A* 2A rejectied without interview 4 oxford coz he got 4.5 4.7 pn BMAT
 
 
 

University open days

  1. University of Cambridge
    St Catharine's College Undergraduate
    Sat, 8 Sep '18
  2. University of Cambridge
    St Catharine's College Undergraduate
    Sat, 15 Sep '18
  3. University of Cambridge
    King's College Undergraduate
    Tue, 18 Sep '18
Poll
How are you feeling in the run-up to Results Day 2018?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.