Take a look at O-Level maths, then you'll see what I mean. O-Levels are still taken by the international students, and they're based on the old O-Levels from the UK...
Oh becuase TSR members are a bloody world renouned authority aren't they.
They are repeating the advice of others.
red_roadkill says:
The majority of journalists at broadsheet papers are Oxbridge graduates in subjects such as English Literature. I wanted to go into journalism right up until I got my AS results, and thought about doing a Journalism/Media degree. I was advised against it and told to do English or History instead, at a top university - and build up a selection of articles over the coming years. I applied for Law in the end.
addict says:
Unfortunately I havent got any sources on this specific subject, but I can confirm that if you look at requirements for high positions in any of the above, they will ask for a traditional degree (ie, History).
red roadkill again:
Media degrees are not well thought of in the media profession. Newspapers [decent ones, national and good locals] will generally want a graduate in an academic, rigorous subject such as English Lit. Media studies is still regarded as a soft subject, and in the competitive field of journalism you often need to be better than that.
But they couldn't make you offers based on your A-level UMS marks could they? The strongest condition they can make on your A-levels is that you obtain all As. I suppose it's a reasonable assumption that you will do just as well at A-level as you did at AS-level, but I also mentioned earlier the disadvantages of using such a finely grained scheme as UMS to judge two different students.
Well, in my interview feedback letter they wrote [I quote]:
"...although Matthew achieved A grades in his AS level subjects, the strength of these grades were not quite as high as those candidates who we were able to make offers to. He was, therefore, regrettably squeezed out by the strength of the competition".
And Lillith Grimore who posts on TSR applied for Law at St Catz, Cambridge like me. She got in .We both did History AS, we both got A's, but her A was about 40 UMS points higher or something significantly better. She also had a set of top UMS scores across the board, whereas my AS's [although A grades], were low to middle A's.
I reckon, alongside interview and GCSE grades, that UMS scores were important to making decisions, especially when there were SO many candidates [72 interviewed and 8 offers ].