The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

I'm not really a lager man but at least it's preferable to fosters etc.

MB
I had a bottle of it the other day.

Satisfactrory.
Reply 3
I like Kronenberg, but it's not my favorite. If you drink it straight from the can, it sometimes tastes metallic, but from a glass it's fine.
Reply 4
Weird. I dunno why i found it so disgusting then :confused: I had been drinking other beer before i drank it. Could that have affected how it tasted to me?
Reply 5
musicbloke
I'm not really a lager man but at least it's preferable to fosters etc.

MB

I actually like Fosters. What's wrong with it? If it's because it's Australian, I fully understand.
Reply 6
need_money
I had been drinking other beer before i drank it. Could that have affected how it tasted to me?


Sometimes. After a week of drinking Hoegarden, Fosters, Miller and Coors all tasted different from usual.
Reply 7
Isnt Kronenbourg the non alcoholic stuff?
Reply 8
deej2
Isnt Kronenbourg the non alcoholic stuff?

No...
Reply 9
glance
I actually like Fosters. What's wrong with it? If it's because it's Australian, I fully understand.


Its about as Australian as Oasis. Its brewed in Manchester under licence from an Australian firm which owns the Fosters brand. Fosters just originated from Australia but the stuff we drink is not Australian.
Reply 10
need_money
No...

Ah yes, Kronenbourg 1664, as in Brasserrie Kronenbourg.
What is the non alcoholic one called then? its got a Blue label
Reply 11
AT82
Its about as Australian as Oasis. Its brewed in Manchester under licence from an Australian firm which owns the Fosters brand. Fosters just originated from Australia but the stuff we drink is not Australian.

Hmm I noticed that. But it still says Australia on the can. Sometimes that's enough to put some people off.
Reply 12
deej2
Ah yes, Kronenbourg 1664, as in Brasserrie Kronenbourg.
What is the non alcoholic one called then? its got a Blue label

Not got a scooby :smile:
Reply 13
glance
Hmm I noticed that. But it still says Australia on the can. Sometimes that's enough to put some people off.


I just buy Fosters if there is nothing better, its nicer than XXXX and thats about all I can say about. Kronenbourg is ok but it is a little bit too strong for my liking.
Reply 14
AT82
I just buy Fosters if there is nothing better, its nicer than XXXX and thats about all I can say about. Kronenbourg is ok but it is a little bit too strong for my liking.

Its only 5% :confused:
Reply 15
AT82
its nicer than XXXX


Concentrated sulphuric acid is nicer than XXXX.....
deej2
Ah yes, Kronenbourg 1664, as in Brasserrie Kronenbourg.
What is the non alcoholic one called then? its got a Blue label


Kaliber?
Reply 17
SyncMaster_770
Concentrated sulphuric acid is nicer than XXXX.....

:rofl: I'll remember to never buy that then. :p:
Reply 18
deej2
Isnt Kronenbourg the non alcoholic stuff?


:rofl:

Has anyone tried Kronenbourg Blanc?
Reply 19
I'd pick Kronenberg over alot of lager.