LSE losing its edge?? Watch

kushagra452
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 8 years ago
#1
The reason I ask this is because of an unusually large number of students from the LSE Econ program were unable to get an internship in IB/Consulting. Did students at Oxbridge also have a tough time? I guess the city is still not recruiting students (for summer internship and full-time) as it used to.

What are your thoughts about this observation?
0
reply
Redemption
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#2
Report 8 years ago
#2
I'd imagine that learning to spell 'losing' might also be worth considering.
0
reply
JakeF
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#3
Report 8 years ago
#3
(Original post by kushagra452)
The reason I ask this is because of an unusually large number of students from the LSE Econ program were unable to get an internship in IB/Consulting. Did students at Oxbridge also have a tough time? I guess the city is still not recruiting students (for summer internship and full-time) as it used to.

What are your thoughts about this observation?
Probably because many at LSE/Oxbridge believe they already have an advantage when it comes to interviewing and go in thinking they're already ahead of the pack because of their university.

Heavy representations from UCL/Warwick/Imperial this summer at quite a few banks.

However, i can sense this thread going the way of many of the other countless threads, so lets not go there.
0
reply
Verne_Lundquist
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#4
Report 8 years ago
#4
the definition of losing is spelling it loosing
0
reply
BuffettIsRight
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#5
Report 8 years ago
#5
You shouldn't care because you have no chance to ever study at LSE or Oxbirdge, looser.
0
reply
Zweihander
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#6
Report 8 years ago
#6
LSE as an academic institution - unrivalled

LSE as the best place to get into banking - the gap's getting narrower
reply
Billy_Van_Barzini
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#7
Report 8 years ago
#7
My opinion:

LSE still dominates, but simply due to numbers.

It's worth distinguishing between Oxbridge; Oxford seems to be losing its charm whilst Cambridge continues to do well.

UCL has seen a huge upswing in the past couple of years, as has Warwick to a lesser extent.

Imperial has seen greater contribution to roles other than quants.

In conclusion, LSE is now crowded out while UCL and Warwick seem to have the biggest upside going forward.
0
reply
Webstersss
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#8
Report 8 years ago
#8
It is much harder to differentiate applicants these days, and LSE chooses to emphasize alot on personal statements; the result of that, have a look yourself on the LSE forum, a good proportion of their current students are trembling before their exams.
0
reply
GwonTon
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#9
Report 8 years ago
#9
Lse is not losing its edge. Its all about the individual candidates
0
reply
Jxhn
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#10
Report 8 years ago
#10
Basically. No. It could be a bad year of students, it could be a year of students not so motivated for IBD in the current anti-bank climate. Stop talking when you have no reputable sample sizes.
0
reply
speedy_s
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#11
Report 8 years ago
#11
LSE has been very strong. The BB (trading) I am interning at, 30% of the interns are LSE. The story is similar across the board from what I gather.
0
reply
anfitrion
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#12
Report 8 years ago
#12
LSE as an institution is as powerful as ever, but I was recently talking to someone who works in HR (non BB HR) and she actually commented on how LSE finance postgraduates aren't what they used to be. Apparently, in the past anyone coming out of LSE's MSc in Accounting and Finance or similar was guaranteed to be a well rounded top class candidate, whereas now they get a few postgrads that don't really meet the expectations for an LSE student. This could be due to an increased number of finance-related degrees.
Apparently the "immaculate" candidates are now found in LBS.
0
reply
tentop6521
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#13
Report 8 years ago
#13
LSE=the new Cass
2
reply
[email protected]
Badges: 9
Rep:
?
#14
Report 8 years ago
#14
(Original post by anfitrion)
LSE as an institution is as powerful as ever, but I was recently talking to someone who works in HR (non BB HR) and she actually commented on how LSE finance postgraduates aren't what they used to be. Apparently, in the past anyone coming out of LSE's MSc in Accounting and Finance or similar was guaranteed to be a well rounded top class candidate, whereas now they get a few postgrads that don't really meet the expectations for an LSE student. This could be due to an increased number of finance-related degrees.
Apparently the "immaculate" candidates are now found in LBS.
LBS candidates won't be entering at an Analyst level. Since you need like 2-3 years experience to even a masters there.
0
reply
Haz313
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#15
Report 8 years ago
#15
(Original post by tentop6521)
LSE=the new Cass
? I heard it was the new Cranfield?
0
reply
Webstersss
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#16
Report 8 years ago
#16
Despite the ambiguities and the reliabilities of league tables, there must be a reason why LSE is falling on every predominant international rankings as an institution, even so after criteria changes a few years back. :curious:
0
reply
Dirac Delta Function
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#17
Report 8 years ago
#17
(Original post by Webstersss)
Despite the ambiguities and the reliabilities of league tables, there must be a reason why LSE is falling on every predominant international rankings as an institution, even so after criteria changes a few years back. :curious:
Research rankings?
0
reply
Webstersss
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#18
Report 8 years ago
#18
(Original post by Dirac Delta Function)
Research rankings?
No no no, LSEs ranking as an institution, which probably included stuff like student satisfaction and other factors ect...

But LSEs research rankings was still at the top, thank you for reminding me that. But I'd be concerned if such specialized institution wasn't.
0
reply
andy87
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#19
Report 8 years ago
#19
from what i've noticed LSE presence tends to be heavier on the S&T side (probably because of the highly quantitative courses) than IBD. IBD is more diverse when it comes to universities (heavy presence from UCL, Warwick, Oxford, Bristol & European Unis:bocconi, sse, hec, etc )-LSE & particularly Imperial have low presence in IBD.
0
reply
tentop6521
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#20
Report 8 years ago
#20
(Original post by Haz313)
? I heard it was the new Cranfield?
why Cranfield?? that's even worst than "New Cass":eek:
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Do you have a food intolerance or allergy?

Yes - a food intolerance (74)
13.73%
Yes - a food allergy (58)
10.76%
Yes - an autoimmune disorder (i.e coeliac, colitis) (15)
2.78%
Yes - I have an intolerance and allergy (15)
2.78%
No (377)
69.94%

Watched Threads

View All