(Original post by CB91)
Polar bears aren't bigger than a walrus. What the hell are you on about?
Conclusion: Walrus don't have camo because it would be useless are they are too fat to blend in properly. And polar bears own them despite the size disadvantage cos they are
You said polar bears > walrus. I replied that walruses don't need camo. You said they can't because they're so fat. I pointed out how big polar bears are to show size was irrelevant.
You agreed that polar bears use camo, despite me pointing out its size. You said a polar bear is not as fat as a walrus.
I replied to this by stating that they are, however, about the same size. You talked about weight, I supplied dictionary definitions to show that weight and size are not the same, backing my original claim.
You appeared to accept this, but went back to disputing that polar bears and walruses are not the same size.
I showed video evidence that they are.
You then provided further video evidence that they are about the same size, but said the polar bear in my video was half its weight due to starvation, thus it is really bigger normally than it appears in that video.
Confirming that we both believe polar bears and walruses are about the same size, if polar bears are not bigger. Thus, rendering your argument that a walrus cannot use camo due to its size irrelevant.
That and it's camouflaged, so it's hidden whether it's an ant or an elephant as long as its surroundings are big enough. Considering, as we established, that polar bears and the walrus in question are the same size, this is evident.