Muslims, who do you put first?

I feel a sense of responsibility towards my countrymen aand i also feel the same way towards fellow Muslims. coincidentally the majority in my country are Muslims. Therefore I see the responsibility doubled.

Apart from that, say, even if my country wasn't a Muslim majority country, I'd still feel I owe something to it.

You got owned by your own illwilled source.

Subhannalllah

hahahah, i like your arrogance, but the arabs are the keyholders, they can pull the plug and your power/electricity/source of fuel would be cut off, your ancestors arent clever enough to of have found an alternative, putting your ancestors in the dark age, the arabs have sat on their asses meanwhile they adapt all your inventions and apply them to everyday life, making your ancestors stupider than mine. But just ushering that statement in rules out any form of intelligence in your brain.

lol your stupidity / troll'ness makes me laugh

this thread is a veritable public relations coup for islam isnt it.

You're basically saying your ancestors are intelligent because they sat back, lest the westerners progress technologically, then reap the benefits of what they have invented.

This means you looked at them doing nothing but waiting to take advantage of technological innovations created by others, then drew the conclusion they must be smarter by letting others do the work for them.

However, have you considered any other possible conclusions? Consider them now and tell me the most plausible.

Atheists, which do you put first?
A) Your fellow countrymen
B) Your fellow atheists
C) You're not an atheist

Children, who do you like better?
A) Daddy, or
B) Chips?

Please can we put an end to badly thought-out questions that were dreamt up on a playground and whose answers only seek to sow division?

"OMG! Muslims put Muslims first before their fellow countrymen! Evil traitors who must be executed/deported/sent to hell!!!111one111!!!"
Oh Pulease....

Atheists, which do you put first?
A) Your fellow countrymen
B) Your fellow atheists
C) You're not an atheist

Children, who do you like better?
A) Daddy, or
B) Chips?

Please can we put an end to badly thought-out questions that were dreamt up on a playground and whose answers only seek to sow division?

"OMG! Muslims put Muslims first before their fellow countrymen! Evil traitors who must be executed/deported/sent to hell!!!111one111!!!"
Oh Pulease....

Is this supposed to be aimed at me? If so, can you explain why? I have not stated anything different to them, they have gone FURTHER in their analysis. So, in what way have I got 'owned'?

DON'T JOKE!1 IS ARE SRS BIZNEZ!!

x

your views and expressions show clear biased and stereotypical attributes based on no evidence at all, when you make these types of judgements on an forum, it shows intellectual inepth.

Before you call me unintelligent or infer intellectual ineptitude on my part, please note your constant grammatical errors and inability to construct correct English sentences or create coherent statements.

no, i wont engage your idiotic comments again, simply because most of them are hatecomments and i cba to argue with you all day.

There are faults in Islam, there are intolerant passages in the Quran which you haven't mentioned. However I have just been slandered elsewhere for criticizing the more draconian passages of the Quran as they are supposedly not relevant ... well, if the passages that the entire religion was founded upon aren't relevant, then what is?

There's a habit on this site of quoting as many tolerant Quran passages as you can find, but quote one intolerant one and that's supposedly 'idiotic', I fail to see how - if the good of the Quran is relevant then so is the bad, it's wrong to cherry pick. Why is the good of the Quran so much more relevant than the bad? The good is to be taken literally, but the bad is always meant to be interpreted to represent emotional suffering?

What about Sura 9:29 which advises fighting and converting non-Muslims? It uses 'qatala' in its imperative form indicating fighting, slaughtering, etc. It was meant to be taken literally and for many years has been (and still is in the east). If you project your own idea of just harmlessly converting then that is your own interpretation as that is in no way indicated.

it was meant to be terribly stupid, but oh well.

Let me point out what you basically did.

you suggested that there is content in a holy book that over a billion people take to be "absolute truth" (forgive the repetition), but not only was it a suggestion, it was a suggestion for a passage that could potentially make people hate islam more because of it, dont you see that this is what this thread is pre-dominantly based on, im sorry you dont see it as to how offensive it really is.

Before you call me unintelligent or infer intellectual ineptitude on my part, please note your constant grammatical errors and inability to construct correct English sentences or create coherent statements.

Although I suspect English is not your first language.