I'm in a spot of bother; for the past ~4 months I've had a lot of due to health/personal issues and now in a position where I'm having to teach a lot of stuff to myself (I can't expect the teachers to go through it all again with me). My FP2 exam is next thursday and I need to get a point where I can comfortably get 40%. I'm not stupid, and I pick things up pretty quickly, so if someone could run through 1 or 2 of the following questions I'm having difficulity with I would REALLY appreciate..
I'm happy with all of question 1, it's a matter of plugging it in to the identity which is easy enough; same with question 2. How do you do question 3? The book did go into substitution however it only gave one example that I can't easily adapt to other questions, if someone could for example run through maybe e) I would be eternally grateful.
The book said that for question 5 you have to first complete the square and then do the same for question 4, what substitution would you use though?
Any help at all would be appreciated, but please bare in mind this is my first real look at this (I did go to a lesson here or there).
I have my own kind of quirk for doing these, which makes them fairly algorithmic and you can't really go wrong. If you'd like to give me a particular example, I can either guide you along, or give you a full example solution (full solutions are, generally, not wanted here - but since you have loads of questions, simply solving 1 of them and therefore showing the method I'm sure isn't going to be an issue) - up to you.
I know that I want it to be "1 plus something squared", so I take out whatever is necessary to make the constant term on the bottom = 1. In this case, I will take out a factor of 2 from the demoninator, leaving me with:
21∫1+23x21
Now I have "1 plus something squared", I can use my trig identities.
I know that sin2θ+cos2θ≡1, so dividing both sides by cosθ gives:
1+tan2θ≡sec2θ
The left hand side looks a lot like my denominator, except instead of 23x2, it has tan2θ
So, I'll make the substitution tanu=23x
Now, I need to change my dx into du, so I need to find what dx and du are in terms of each other.
I can do this by differentiating the substitution I made, tanu=23x
Differentiating both sides [implicitly] gives:
sec2udxdu=23
Rearranging to make dx the subject:
32sec2udu=dx
Slot that in, instead of dx, and take the constants out to the front, to finally transform your integral into:
232∫1+tan2usec2u
We already know that 1+tan2u≡sec2u, so that integral is just the integral of 1, with respect to u.
232∫sec2usec2udu=232∫1du=232u
We know from our earlier substitution that tanu=23x, meaning u=arctan23x
So finally, our final answer is 232arctan23x+C
(Or, if you want to make the fraction on the outside look prettier, rationalise the denominator and it becomes:
61arctan23x+C
It seems very long, but that's because I'm stalling a lot on each point. Basically, take our common factors so you get "1 + something squared", use the appropriate trig indentity to make your "something" a trig term, the act of finding the dx and du will give you something that always cancels to the integral of 1, and you just take the arc-function of your substitution.
Zeidj if you have the time please would you give the full solutions to a couple of questions.. that would benefit me the most
Please could you do 4 e) and f) and 5 c) ?
I've just done 4e, hopefully you can see how it works. For the ones with quadratics, what you should do is complete the square, and you end up again with "something squared" and a number. You'll see what to do, just keep taking out factors so you get the constant term 1, and you'll always be able to make a substitution that will cancel out nicely and basically have you integrating "1" a lot of the time. you then just take the arc-function of whatever your substitution was, and don't forget + C [I actually had to ninja edit that, because I forgot + C after doing all that typing ]
EDIT: also, I've left out my "dx" and "du" pretty much the whole way along, I'm terrible at remembering those - hopefully it's clear where they "should" be, anyway
Thanks, however the book suggests to use the substituion x=cu, is your method any more difficult that using that?
The method I used is fairly standard, except that I take my factors out all the way along so I can see what's going on, rather than referring to the standard result. I have a terrible memory, you see, which I guess you can see from me having to quote sin^2 + cos^2 = 1 and dividing it, rather than quoting the "1 + tan^2 = sec^2" straight away :P
I don't really see what they mean by x = cu, unless they mean u to be a function where you can take u=tanθ and c=32, which gives x=32tanθ. As you can see by rearranging slightly, this is exactly the substitution I made.
I read the example where they integrated a2+b2x21 using the subsitution bx = au.
I used this for question 4a) and get the correct answer. It also works for a2−b2x21
Basically using that substition turns your integral into numbernumber1+u21. Personally, I found this method much easier. I am absolutley terrible with trigonometry (I sat my C3 and C4 exams a year ago and have never looked book since I got an A on both). I just don't remember them! I do sort-of understand your working but I look at the trig and shut down
Thanks for the help, your example did show me the method of to use the substituion and after reading I was able to answer it, in my own way atleast
I read the example where they integrated a2+b2x21 using the subsitution bx = au.
I used this for question 4a) and get the correct answer. It also works for a2−b2x21
Basically using that substition turns your integral into numbernumber1+u21. Personally, I found this method much easier. I am absolutley terrible with trigonometry (I sat my C3 and C4 exams a year ago and have never looked book since I got an A on both). I just don't remember them! I do sort-of understand your working but I look at the trig and shut down
Thanks for the help, your example did show me the method of to use the substituion and after reading I was able to answer it, in my own way atleast
but then to integrate the ∫u2+11, you're going to need trig anyway.. right? Or do you just get to that point and jump to the standard result? Whichever way works best for you is the way to go - use what you're comfortable with
As I only need 40% I don't need to understand the questions where they ask for combinations of everything, I don't think I need to understand how to calculate the standard result for myself. (I roughly know however you just use tan y = x and differentiate with respect to x)
I need a B in further maths which at the moment needs I need 40% in FP2 and M2, 80% in S2 and D2
I know that I want it to be "1 plus something squared", so I take out whatever is necessary to make the constant term on the bottom = 1. In this case, I will take out a factor of 2 from the demoninator, leaving me with:
21∫1+23x21
Now I have "1 plus something squared", I can use my trig identities.
I know that sin2θ+cos2θ≡1, so dividing both sides by cosθ gives:
1+tan2θ≡sec2θ
The left hand side looks a lot like my denominator, except instead of 23x2, it has tan2θ
So, I'll make the substitution tanu=23x
Now, I need to change my dx into du, so I need to find what dx and du are in terms of each other.
I can do this by differentiating the substitution I made, tanu=23x
Differentiating both sides [implicitly] gives:
sec2udxdu=23
Rearranging to make dx the subject:
32sec2udu=dx
Slot that in, instead of dx, and take the constants out to the front, to finally transform your integral into:
232∫1+tan2usec2u
We already know that 1+tan2u≡sec2u, so that integral is just the integral of 1, with respect to u.
232∫sec2usec2udu=232∫1du=232u
We know from our earlier substitution that tanu=23x, meaning u=arctan23x
So finally, our final answer is 232arctan23x+C
(Or, if you want to make the fraction on the outside look prettier, rationalise the denominator and it becomes:
61arctan23x+C
It seems very long, but that's because I'm stalling a lot on each point. Basically, take our common factors so you get "1 + something squared", use the appropriate trig indentity to make your "something" a trig term, the act of finding the dx and du will give you something that always cancels to the integral of 1, and you just take the arc-function of your substitution.
An easier way to do this is to make the x2 coefficient 1 and then use the standard formula. Although the standard formula is derived from the method above
An easier way to do this is to make the x2 coefficient 1 and then use the standard formula. Although the standard formula is derived from the method above
Please don't resurrect threads that are 10 years old!