Like everyone else, i am always disgusted to hear the news of more paeodphiles been found in society. BUT surely we can't blame them for every single death of a child. yes we must be suspicious but we can't automatically condemn them. do you agree?
Yep, there is an almost complete absence of reasoned and well informed debate where sex offenders are concerned in the press...anyone who doubts this is most welcome to read my thesis where I did a study to prove it!
i agree, look at this new murder- rory
automatically a sex offender is blamed, wheterh he did it or not, why couldn't a "normal" person have killed rory. any murderer should be caught, but to be under suspicion because of your record with children is just wrong
Because of my love for programmes such as CSI, I would like to see all the evidence before comdeming someone.
Did that guy who killed those two girls (Holly and Jessica or something like that) have a sexual motive? I remember a vague mention of it in the pub once and roughly related to the subject of this thread...
Yes they are. And its becasue , as we already hate them, no one wants to emp/sympathise with a paedophile who may be innocent. its almost a case of severe peer pressure. Hows it going to look if we defend a Paedophile?
No, paedophiles aren't the sacpegoat, but they are blamed for every murder concerning a CHILD.
Was the person who attacked (granted that she didn't die) the women walking her child, her name forgets me, a paedophile?
But yes, anyone convicted by a jury is seen in the public eyes as a paedophile.
Paedophiles are the scapegoats for everything. A paedophile ate my homework, once.