The Student Room Logo
Chemistry Research, Durham University
Durham University
Durham
This thread is closed

Durham General Chat Thread

Scroll to see replies

*yawns*
Chemistry Research, Durham University
Durham University
Durham
Reply 8921
Fields
Showers?

Teeth cleaning :biggrin:
Reply 8922
Thank you Tufts!! :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:

You reviserating?
Wez
... We don't value democracy as an instrumental process, that is to say we don't value democracy because we believe it forms the most efficient and effective form of government. Virtually no-one seriously claims this. If they do, it's generally just rhetoric. Rather, the point of having democracy is different. Democracy allows a form of government which people can consent to because they feel it is fair. It creates a form of government that we can consider legitimate. ...


I do. A hundred years ago, the eugenicist Francis Galton set out to prove his contention that, with “the stupidity and wrong-headedness of many men and women being so great as to be scarcely possible”, power must be kept in the hands of a select, well-bred few. He carried out an impromptu experiment at a country fair, where there was a competition to guess the weight of a big ox once it had been slaughtered and butchered. The closest guess won the prize, but Galton wanted to show how hopeless the ‘collective’ (i.e. average) judgment would be. Nearly eight hundred people took part and Galton obtained a list of all their guesses. The ox, when slaughtered, yielded 1,197 lbs of meat. Galton worked out the average (mean) of all the guesses and it was 1,198 lbs. A graph of the guesses showed a normal distribution round this mean, which matched almost perfectly the objective truth.

The study was reported in the scientific journal Nature, and Galton grudgingly conceded that perhaps democracy did have something going for it after all. This compelling finding has since been replicated many times and in many different circumstances. The full story can be found in James Surowiecki’s acclaimed and readable book The Wisdom of Crowds.
Reply 8924
Jurisprude
Thank you Tufts!! :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:

You reviserating?


yesh :puppyeyes:

And essaying
Reply 8925
Tufts
yesh :puppyeyes:

And essaying


lol awhh sorry!

Essays? How many? They summative?
Reply 8926
2 summative. 1 formative.
Reply 8927
Tufts
2 summative. 1 formative.


:eek2:

Good luck!!
Reply 8928
thank you :indiff:
papa power!
I do. A hundred years ago, the eugenicist Francis Galton set out to prove his contention that, with “the stupidity and wrong-headedness of many men and women being so great as to be scarcely possible”, power must be kept in the hands of a select, well-bred few. He carried out an impromptu experiment at a country fair, where there was a competition to guess the weight of a big ox once it had been slaughtered and butchered. The closest guess won the prize, but Galton wanted to show how hopeless the ‘collective’ (i.e. average) judgment would be. Nearly eight hundred people took part and Galton obtained a list of all their guesses. The ox, when slaughtered, yielded 1,197 lbs of meat. Galton worked out the average (mean) of all the guesses and it was 1,198 lbs. A graph of the guesses showed a normal distribution round this mean, which matched almost perfectly the objective truth.

The study was reported in the scientific journal Nature, and Galton grudgingly conceded that perhaps democracy did have something going for it after all. This compelling finding has since been replicated many times and in many different circumstances. The full story can be found in James Surowiecki’s acclaimed and readable book The Wisdom of Crowds.

Unfortuantly there is one big flaw in your argument, the task chosen is very simple, and has no real consequences attached to it. Running a country is far more complex than that, the majority of the population do not even understand or know of most of the things required to run a nation. It would be like askking your question in Manderin to British people, the average answer would "eh?".
Tufts
thank you :indiff:


Just saw this, and couldn't help but think of you.
Reply 8931
Kater Murr
Just saw this, and couldn't help but think of you.


lol I found about about it after I chose my name.

My cat is called 'tufts' :ninja:
This is the first Easter in like 13 years I've never had to revise.
Feels weird.
Still have boring work to do though...:indiff:
Reply 8933
I'm sooooo knackered :coffee:
Oh God I'm playing Loveshack on here and I miss Durham SO much. Even Loveshack. :p:
Reply 8935
****ing bastard :mad: :mad: :mad: Hardly any of the books from one of my reading lists are even stocked by the library???!! How are Durham aloud to get away with this?? WTF?? :eek: :eek: :eek: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Hit them? With sticks? You can request new stock, but knowing the library it would probably take forever...
Reply 8937
bravenewcentury
Hit them? With sticks? You can request new stock, but knowing the library it would probably take forever...


Isn't this not the lecturers fault for not requesting the books be stocked by the library?

Seriously guys I'm fuming :mad:
I think they are supposed to check its in the library before putting it on a reading list.
Reply 8939
Itchynscratchy
I think they are supposed to check its in the library before putting it on a reading list.


Indeed.

What a bitch :mad: Needless to say I've sent a strongly worded email to said lecturer.

As soon as I clicked 'send' I thought "is this likely to help or hinder my obtaining of these books? Eeep. Too late" :redface:

Latest