I just spent 2 hours trying to make a timeline of all the paintings I've studied for my Renaissance Italy course, only i kept missing works out of it and having to start over again. Finally got it finshed on my 6th attempt!
I just spent 2 hours trying to make a timeline of all the paintings I've studied for my Renaissance Italy course, only i kept missing works out of it and having to start over again. Finally got it finshed on my 6th attempt!
Meh you should have done it in computer. Then you could have nice images of all the painting in it as well...
I just spent 2 hours trying to make a timeline of all the paintings I've studied for my Renaissance Italy course, only i kept missing works out of it and having to start over again. Finally got it finshed on my 6th attempt!
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee one more book done.
My degree is eating my brain.
How are you going about revision? Just reading intros/conclusions of books and making sparse notes? Or something else?
I've yet to start...
I also missed that lecture on the last Tuesday (I think?) of term where they explained revision technqiues. The power-point slides don't help much tbh. Was anything interesting/useful said in it?
How are you going about revision? Just reading intros/conclusions of books and making sparse notes? Or something else?
I've yet to start...
I also missed that lecture on the last Tuesday (I think?) of term where they explained revision technqiues. The power-point slides don't help much tbh. Was anything interesting/useful said in it?
I couldn't make it either as I help out at a primary school on a Tuesday morning (and I agree about the slides being pretty awful). Apparently nothing especially useful was said other than to 'think sideways' and remember that we're not going to be credited for factual information. I've tackled half of my modules so far (New Heaven, New Earth, Reformation Europe and Experiencing Empire). The first thing I do is to go through the one book I own (usually a core text, so it's the Bartlett book for NH, NE, and The Lion's Share for Empire) slowly, armed with a highlighter and I summarise the main argument. Sparse notes are the way to go or I don't have a hope in hell of remembering any of it. Then I descend into the wonderful world of topics by going over seminar notes and any articles/notes from books that I have and brain-storming different sub-themes that come up. This part would be easier to do from the library. Finally, I look at exam questions (the Empire ones are particularly unpleasant, but apparently the lecture until this year was evil so hopefully ours will be better).
That sounds really complicated and a bit OCD now that I read it, which doesn't really surprise me. I think I'm compensating for the fact that I have absolutely no idea what I'm doing in terms of the learning by forming a nice plan that I can progress through in a semi-logical manner (interspersed with bouts of panic).
Remind me of your course again and what it consists of? (what materials do you use? journal articles, books, reports?)
History and Politics.
The Politics side, in all honesty, is a bit basic. We get textbooks and you just need a basic grasp of the concepts covered and be able to formulate arguments/discussions of them with reference to real world examples across the globe. Knowledge of a few more specialist books and the odd article is necessary.
For the History side there are no textbooks. There are 'core' books, but they all differ widely in their interpretation of the period. Monographs/books, articles, essay collections etc. are all necessary and you need to formulate your own argument on topics tangential to those covered in books while incorporating the main themes of said books into the essay. Generally, you just need to think laterally a bit.
History and Politics. The Politics side, in all honesty, is a bit basic. We get textbooks and you just need a basic grasp of the concepts covered and be able to formulate arguments/discussions of them with reference to real world examples across the globe. Knowledge of a few more specialist books and the odd article is necessary.
For the History side there are no textbooks. There are 'core' books, but they all differ widely in their interpretation of the period. Monographs/books, articles, essay collections etc. are all necessary and you need to formulate your own argument on topics tangential to those covered in books while incorporating the main themes of said books into the essay. Generally, you just need to think laterally a bit.
I'm so glad that I'm not the only one who thinks that about politics. I swear I have a very small grasp of key concepts in IR, but I seem to do well in the essays even though I don't really have any idea of what I'm really talking about!
Right, back to 'thinking sideways', as Julian put it...
The Politics side, in all honesty, is a bit basic. We get textbooks and you just need a basic grasp of the concepts covered and be able to formulate arguments/discussions of them with reference to real world examples across the globe. Knowledge of a few more specialist books and the odd article is necessary.
For the History side there are no textbooks. There are 'core' books, but they all differ widely in their interpretation of the period. Monographs/books, articles, essay collections etc. are all necessary and you need to formulate your own argument on topics tangential to those covered in books while incorporating the main themes of said books into the essay. Generally, you just need to think laterally a bit.
Ahh yes. History sounds a lot like the way sociology is run *shudders* Why did I take that outside module