So i've done this aaages ago and couldnt find much help on the internet. I was asked to draw a dot and cross diagram of [PCl4]+. Could any 1 help me with thatp lz?
So i've done this aaages ago and couldnt find much help on the internet. I was asked to draw a dot and cross diagram of [PCl4]+. Could any 1 help me with thatp lz?
Thanks.
Phosphorus is in group 5 = five valence electrons Each chlorine (7 electrons) provides 1 electron to form a single bond = 4 electrons But the species has a positive charge overall = -1 electron ---------------------------------------------------------
Phosphorus is in group 5 = five valence electrons Each chlorine (7 electrons) provides 1 electron to form a single bond = 4 electrons But the species has a positive charge overall = -1 electron ---------------------------------------------------------
can you take it from there?
Oh yes there is a dative covalent bond isnt there?
Oh yes there is a dative covalent bond isnt there?
Thanks.
You cannot dative coordinate to chlorine as it already has 7 electrons. Chlorine cannot dative coordinate to phosphorus as that would not sort out it's outer shell of 7 electrons...
You cannot dative coordinate to chlorine as it already has 7 electrons. Chlorine cannot dative coordinate to phosphorus as that would not sort out it's outer shell of 7 electrons...
In brief, no.
Right. So would the right structure have P in the middle, covalently bonding to 4 chlorines. This would leave one electron in phosphorus' outer shell. Right? Now because this electron is not paired, is that the reason why the whole specie is +ve ?
Right. So would the right structure have P in the middle, covalently bonding to 4 chlorines. This would leave one electron in phosphorus' outer shell. Right? Now because this electron is not paired, is that the reason why the whole specie is +ve ?
Thakns.
I'm afraid your maths is a little shaky:
Read the post above...
Phosphorus = 5 Chlorines = 4 Positive charge subtract one electron -------------------- total electrons = 8 --------------------
Interesting. Is it because it is a free radical and reacts with (almost) anything that comes around?
It is a positive ion
Free radicals are uncharged.
You need to do some basic housekeeping...
Phosphorus (at no 15) has 15 protons and 15 electrons so overall it has no charge.
Each chlorine (at no. = 17) has 17 protons and 17 electrons, so overall no change
If you add up all of the protons in (hypothetical) PCl4 = 15 + 17 + 17 + 17 + 17 = 83+ If you add up all of the electrons in (hypothetical) PCl4 = 15 + 17 + 17 + 17 + 17 = 83-
So (hypothetical) PCl4 has a charge = +83 - 83 = 0
However PCl4+ has 1 positive charge. It cannot have gained a proton so ....
.... it must have lost an electron.
The electron can't be lost from a chlorine (as this would leave the Cl with only 7 in the valence shell), so it must have been lost from the Phosphorus valence shell.
Summary -------- Phosphorus has four pairs of e's in its valence shell = tetrahedral.
Phosphorus (at no 15) has 15 protons and 15 electrons so overall it has no charge.
Each chlorine (at no. = 17) has 17 protons and 17 electrons, so overall no change
If you add up all of the protons in (hypothetical) PCl4 = 15 + 17 + 17 + 17 + 17 = 83+ If you add up all of the electrons in (hypothetical) PCl4 = 15 + 17 + 17 + 17 + 17 = 83-
So (hypothetical) PCl4 has a charge = +83 - 83 = 0
However PCl4+ has 1 positive charge. It cannot have gained a proton so ....
.... it must have lost an electron.
The electron can't be lost from a chlorine (as this would leave the Cl with only 7 in the valence shell), so it must have been lost from the Phosphorus valence shell.
Summary -------- Phosphorus has four pairs of e's in its valence shell = tetrahedral.
At Alevel standard, do we just assume that the lost electron just disappears randomly?