Proof that the squareroot of -i is 17. Watch

This discussion is closed.
Juwel
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#21
Report 16 years ago
#21
(Original post by Ben.S.)
(-1)^(1/2) is denoted as 'i'. It doesn't exist, but is damn useful!

Ben
I know about i. It was a typo, I meant to say, sqrt(-i) = 1...
0
Juwel
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#22
Report 16 years ago
#22
(Original post by fishpaste)
Programming convention uses !=
... So why is that relevant to your proof?
0
fishpaste
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#23
Report Thread starter 16 years ago
#23
(Original post by ZJuwelH)
... So why is that relevant to your proof?
Because the notation doesn't change the logic.
0
Ben.S.
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#24
Report 16 years ago
#24
(Original post by ZJuwelH)
I know about i. It was a typo, I meant to say, sqrt(-i) = 1...
Oh, sorry. Wouldn't that be to say that -i = 1?

Ben
0
It'sPhil...
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#25
Report 16 years ago
#25
(Original post by ZJuwelH)
... So why is that relevant to your proof?
hes just mucking around - basically saying x doesn't equall y, and y doesn't equall z therefore x=z.
0
fishpaste
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#26
Report Thread starter 16 years ago
#26
(Original post by It'sPhil...)
hes just mucking around - basically saying x doesn't equall y, and y doesn't equall z therefore x=z.
And so, I conclusively prove that everybody on this messageboard = bumblebees.
0
GH
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#27
Report 16 years ago
#27
(Original post by fishpaste)
And so, I conclusively prove that everybody on this messageboard = bumblebees.
*Buzzzzz
0
Juwel
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#28
Report 16 years ago
#28
(Original post by Ben.S.)
Oh, sorry. Wouldn't that be to say that -i = 1?

Ben
Yeah exactly, ain't that right?
0
Ben.S.
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#29
Report 16 years ago
#29
(Original post by ZJuwelH)
Yeah exactly, ain't that right?
The modulus of -i in the Argand plane is 1, certainly. I don't know if this allows you to say that -i = 1. Actually, I'm quite sure that it doesn't.

Ben
0
maths
Badges: 0
#30
Report 16 years ago
#30
QUITE EASY TO FIND

set (a+ib)^2=-i

open brackets. for two complex numbers to be equal their real and complex parts must be eqaul. so u get two simulteneous equations for a and b . solving for real a and b . as a and b are difined as real. we get

a = -1/root2 and b = 1/root


there the the square root of -iisnt 17

its -1/root2 +(1/root2)i
0
elpaw
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#31
Report 16 years ago
#31
something does not equal something else does not imply something equals something else entirely given something else does not equal something else entirely fullstop

(i might be able to give you this in symbolic notation if i had a scanner right now.)
0
Jonatan
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#32
Report 16 years ago
#32
(Original post by fishpaste)
squareroot of -i = (-i)^1/2 = 1 + (-i)^1/2 - 1 != 2, since 2^2 = 4 != -i.

Now 2 != 17

=> (-i)^1/2 = 17.
This was the most silly derivation Ive seen! You just treated an inequality as an equation. here you have an equally silly derivation which follows the same pattern:

3 is not equal to 4

5 is not equal to 4

Thus 3 is equal to 5.

It doesnt take a genious to see why this, and consequently your, equation is incorrect.
0
elpaw
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#33
Report 16 years ago
#33
(Original post by Jonatan)
This was the most silly derivation Ive seen! You just treated an inequality as an equation. here you have an equally silly derivation which follows the same pattern:

3 is not equal to 4

5 is not equal to 4

Thus 3 is equal to 5.

It doesnt take a genious to see why this, and consequently your, equation is incorrect.
that is what i was trying to say (albeit in a slightly longwinded way)
0
Jonatan
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#34
Report 16 years ago
#34
(Original post by elpaw)
that is what i was trying to say (albeit in a slightly longwinded way)
Oh, sorry , I didnt really bother to read teh replies...

From now on I think Im just going to ignore these threads...
0
elpaw
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#35
Report 16 years ago
#35
(Original post by Jonatan)
Oh, sorry , I didnt really bother to read teh replies...

From now on I think Im just going to ignore these threads...
what you said was worth it (because my thing just didn't make any sense)
0
Jonatan
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#36
Report 16 years ago
#36
(Original post by elpaw)
what you said was worth it (because my thing just didn't make any sense)
Yea but phil siad it already...

Im going to ignore this thread starting NOW!
0
Linda
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#37
Report 16 years ago
#37
(Original post by elpaw)
what you said was worth it (because my thing just didn't make any sense)
"hes just mucking around - basically saying x doesn't equall y, and y doesn't equall z therefore x=z." was better
0
Jonatan
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#38
Report 16 years ago
#38
(Original post by Linda)
"hes just mucking around - basically saying x doesn't equall y, and y doesn't equall z therefore x=z." was better
Humpf, my own girlfriend tries to discredit my post...

Starting NOW!
0
not1
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#39
Report 16 years ago
#39
i always find it funny the way that you guys take a joke seriously and bother writing proper posts to show that the 'proof' etc. (ie joke) is wrong.
0
4Ed
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#40
Report 16 years ago
#40
right, just to clear up this debate......... the answer to EVERYTHING is 42

so you're all wrong
0
X
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

People at uni: do initiations (like heavy drinking) put you off joining sports societies?

Yes (216)
67.92%
No (102)
32.08%

Watched Threads

View All