Daddy, why did we go to war?

Yes well done, have a teddy from the bottom shelf...

Yes well done, have a teddy from the bottom shelf...

hehe, did you read gq's joke of the month

are you blind??

"i was hoping for something a little more inventive. there wasnt much imagination or clever rhetoric in there..in fact, its pretty accurate..cant have any complaints there. "

"Deviation, she's ignoring it."

do they still award wooden spoons?

I don't know what you're on about...

that wouldnt be the first time...

And not the last either. Cheers Vienna I'm yawning already, there, my hypothesis proved.

yawning?
hypothesis??

Sorry, for the long post, still worth the read though.

DADDY, WHY DID WE GO TO WAR?


Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?
A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction, honey.
Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction...


...Q: So basically, what you're saying is that we attacked Iraq because George W. Bush hears voices in his head?
A: Yes! You finally understand how the world works. Now close your eyes, make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.
Good night, Daddy

hehe, aww don't stop. this was just beginning to get interesting

ROFL, especially the voices in the head thing

Not to me, hence the yawning. Vienna is starting to remind me of a test cricket tactic: if you can't bowl them out, bore them out...

theyre still out....

but for how long?

Of course, if you want to ignore the obvious, such as the fact that Saddam indeed was a way worse dictator than the communist regime in china and that China's military power makes an invation impossible, its not easy to make a list so full of crap like this one. In addition, I quite hoenstly do not see why people criticize the US for removing Saddam Husein. If you are to critisize the US for their actions in Iraq, at least do it because of the civilian victims of the war or the consequences you think it may bring. Lets get it straight right now. Saddam Husein deserves the worst and more upon that. There is no reason why you would critisize the US for dealing with him. You could critisize them for not dealing with him earlier, or because they do not take similar action against other dictators, but when you critisize the US solely because they atacked and removed a dictatorship such as thebath party, then you are in reality defending that dictatorship.

USA installed and supported Saddam.
Dot.