Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Why should non-smokers have to suffer from the nasty stench and the second-hand smoke that smokers produce, usually without concern for other people - so long as they can get a fix from their addiction?

    I propose that smoking is banned from the streets.

    However, to not make it so unfair on smokers - most places would have several smoking shelters - with one no more than 10 minutes walk from another. These would be covered areas where smoking would be permitted. A smoker could stop there, have a smoke and carry on walking - without affecting non-smokers.
    • Offline

      2
      Wow, with your logic they should just make smoking illegal.
      • Offline

        11
        That's limiting one's freedom. Whatever next, a dress code?
        • Political Ambassador
        Offline

        17
        ReputationRep:
        Freedom's a ***** brah
        Offline

        2
        ReputationRep:
        If you're not trolling you're pretty ****ing stupid. Banning drinking full stop should be of much higher priority.

        Why should non-drinkers have to suffer from the violence, vandalism and anti-social behaviour that drinkers produce, usually without concern for other people - so long as they can get a fix from their habit?
        Offline

        0
        ReputationRep:
        I'm not a smoker but people who whine about smokers bother me much more than smokers themselves.
        • Offline

          2
          (Original post by domino0806)
          that's limiting one's freedom. Whatever next, a dress code?
          everyone must wear ponchos!
          Offline

          0
          ReputationRep:
          Maggie strikes again

          :congrats:
          Offline

          0
          ReputationRep:
          and then when these shelters are put up, you'll make a thread asking why you have to walk past these shelters and suffer their vile stench.
          if you dont like it, go stand inside with the rest of the people who think they are better than smokers
          Offline

          14
          ReputationRep:
          (Original post by 01010000 01001010)
          If you're not trolling you're pretty ****ing stupid. Banning drinking full stop should be of much higher priority.

          Why should non-drinkers have to suffer from the violence, vandalism and anti-social behaviour that drinkers produce, usually without concern for other people - so long as they can get a fix from their habit?

          Repped


          OP has to be trolling surely!
          Offline

          0
          ReputationRep:
          Why should non-trollers have to suffer from the nasty antics and the second-hand foolishness that trollers produce, usually without concern for other people - so long as they can get a fix from their addiction?

          I propose that trolling is banned from the forums.

          However, to not make it so unfair on trollers - most places would have several trolling shelters - with one no more than 10 minutes walk from another. These would be covered areas where trolling would be permitted. A troll could stop there, have a troll-fix and carry on trolling - without affecting non-trollers.

          WAT.
          Offline

          14
          ReputationRep:
          (Original post by Margaret Thatcher)
          [U]Why should non-smokers have to suffer from the nasty stench and the second-hand smoke that smokers produce[/U.
          because its all about sharing the love
          Offline

          1
          ReputationRep:
          The streets? No.

          Enclosed public spaces? Yes but at the owners discretion.
          • Thread Starter
          Offline

          1
          ReputationRep:
          (Original post by 01010000 01001010)
          If you're not trolling you're pretty ****ing stupid. Banning drinking full stop should be of much higher priority.

          Why should non-drinkers have to suffer from the violence, vandalism and anti-social behaviour that drinkers produce, usually without concern for other people - so long as they can get a fix from their habit?
          Actually, drinking is banned in the streets. However, there are designated, sheltered areas where you can drink (pubs and clubs). Not too different from my proposal.

          And, drinking does not always cause that result, unless you drink too much. Whereas, smoking will always cause the effects I have mentioned.
          • Thread Starter
          Offline

          1
          ReputationRep:
          (Original post by Gulli)
          and then when these shelters are put up, you'll make a thread asking why you have to walk past these shelters and suffer their vile stench.
          if you dont like it, go stand inside with the rest of the people who think they are better than smokers
          These shelters would be covered, and the side facing the street would have a screen - much like some bus shelters.

          And who says they have to be directly where non-smokers are?
          Offline

          2
          ReputationRep:
          (Original post by Margaret Thatcher)
          Why should non-smokers have to suffer from the nasty stench and the second-hand smoke that smokers produce, usually without concern for other people - so long as they can get a fix from their addiction?

          I propose that smoking is banned from the streets.

          However, to not make it so unfair on smokers - most places would have several smoking shelters - with one no more than 10 minutes walk from another. These would be covered areas where smoking would be permitted. A smoker could stop there, have a smoke and carry on walking - without affecting non-smokers.
          I think morons like you should be legally required to wear a badge everywhere you go informing people to stay the **** away.
          • Thread Starter
          Offline

          1
          ReputationRep:
          (Original post by domino0806)
          That's limiting one's freedom. Whatever next, a dress code?
          Freedom is already limited in this country.

          And what about the non-smoker's freedom to walk through a street without having to inhale second-hand smoke?
          Offline

          1
          ReputationRep:
          Rather authoritarian from a libertarian, ma'am.
          Offline

          19
          ReputationRep:
          (Original post by Margaret Thatcher)
          Actually, drinking is banned in the streets. However, there are designated, sheltered areas where you can drink (pubs and clubs). Not too different from my proposal.

          And, drinking does not always cause that result, unless you drink too much. Whereas, smoking will always cause the effects I have mentioned.
          And you do realise that the very cost of your proposal makes this idea unworkable.

          It is just a dumb idea.
          Offline

          14
          ReputationRep:
          **** off Nazi.
         
         
         
      • See more of what you like on The Student Room

        You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

      • Poll
        Will you be richer or poorer than your parents?
        Useful resources

        Groups associated with this forum:

        View associated groups
      • See more of what you like on The Student Room

        You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

      • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

        Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

        Quick reply
        Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.