Hey,
I've been doing a bit of stats lately and don't get one concept. Here's a Q:
5 Cards dealt w/o replacement from a pack of 52. Find Prob that 3 of the 5 are hearts. The book explains it like this:
There's 52C5 sets of 5 cards.
Theres 13C3 sets of 3 hearts and 39C2 sets of 'nonhearts'.
So the no. of sets of 5 cards with 3 hearts is (13C3)x(39C2)
So P(3 hearts in a set of 5) = (13C3)x(39C2) / 52C5
Am I missing something obvious? To me, the 52 cards aren't distinct, so you aren't going to get 52C5 sets of 5. I could have a billion cards, half blue half red, and choose 2, but I don't get 1billionC2 combos. It'd be blueblue, bluered or redred. They seem to do the same thing regarding 13C3; to me you only get one combo, a 3set of hearts. The concept of different combinations of 3hearts doesn't make sense to me; all these sets are the same.
Any help? There's another Q with 47 sweets; 22 red, 15 blue and 10 green, and the answers are achieved using this type of working too. But it doesn't make sense to me because we don't have 47 distinct sweets, or different sets of onlyblue sweets etc (in analogy to different sets of 3 hearts)
Thanks.

Physics Enemy
 Follow
 20 followers
 19 badges
 Send a private message to Physics Enemy
 Thread Starter
Offline19ReputationRep: Follow
 1
 05122010 23:16
Last edited by Physics Enemy; 05122010 at 23:32. 
 Follow
 2
 06122010 01:51
The problem with your approach is that if you treated the cards as identical apart from whether they have a heart and you don't worry about order then your workings would look something like:
There's 6 sets of 5 cards (0 hearts, 1 heart, ..., 5 hearts)
There's 1 set of 3 hearts and 1 set of 2 nonhearts
So the number of sets of 5 cards with 3 hearts is 1
But then when you calculate the probability, it doesn't work. You can't just do 1/6 because these 6 sets of heart/nonheart combinations are not equally likely. In case you don't believe me:Spoiler:ShowIn a lottery you either have a winning ticket or a nonwinning ticket. That doesn't mean your chances of winning are 1/2
By treating the different cards as distinct, they're able to say that there are 52C5 sets of 5 cards and each of these sets are equally likely so they can use that to calculate a probability. 
Physics Enemy
 Follow
 20 followers
 19 badges
 Send a private message to Physics Enemy
 Thread Starter
Offline19ReputationRep: Follow
 3
 06122010 12:14
(Original post by ttoby)
The problem with your approach is that if you treated the cards as identical apart from whether they have a heart and you don't worry about order then your workings would look something like:
There's 6 sets of 5 cards (0 hearts, 1 heart, ..., 5 hearts)
There's 1 set of 3 hearts and 1 set of 2 nonhearts
So the number of sets of 5 cards with 3 hearts is 1
But then when you calculate the probability, it doesn't work. You can't just do 1/6 because these 6 sets of heart/nonheart combinations are not equally likely. In case you don't believe me:Spoiler:ShowIn a lottery you either have a winning ticket or a nonwinning ticket. That doesn't mean your chances of winning are 1/2
Regarding your lottery analogy; yes you either have a winning ticket or a nonwinning ticket. But the nonwinning tickets heavily outweigh the winning ones, so the probabilities will reflect that. Just like nonhearts outweighing the hearts.(Original post by ttoby)
By treating the different cards as distinct, they're able to say that there are 52C5 sets of 5 cards and each of these sets are equally likely so they can use that to calculate a probability.
I'm struggling to wrap my head around the idea that they'll just treat the cards as distinct for the sake of calculating probability, then work out the various 'unique' sets, then divide to get probabilities ... even though the cards aren't distinct.
Anything else you can add to help me?Last edited by Physics Enemy; 06122010 at 12:23. 
Get me off the £\?%!^@ computer
 Follow
 0 followers
 0 badges
 Send a private message to Get me off the £\?%!^@ computer
Offline0ReputationRep: Follow
 4
 06122010 12:41
(Original post by Physics Enemy)
... even though the cards aren't distinct.
Anything else you can add to help me? 
Physics Enemy
 Follow
 20 followers
 19 badges
 Send a private message to Physics Enemy
 Thread Starter
Offline19ReputationRep: Follow
 5
 06122010 12:51
To add, I can see how this is a good trick for the sake of calculating probability:
Treating the cards as distinct allows us to have 52C5 unique 5sets, and 13C3 unique 3sets of hearts, and 39C2 unique 2sets of nonhearts. 13C3x39C2 gives us the number of 5sets with 3 hearts and 2 nonhearts. Dividing this by 52C5 gives us the relative frequency of obtaining such a set out of all the sets possible, and thus it's probability.
I guess, as this trick seems a little counter intuitive at first, how else could one do the Q? That got me thinking. I have a pack of 52 with 39 nonhearts and 13 hearts. I want to know the probability of selecting 5 cards such that 3 are hearts, and 2 are nonhearts.
Heart > Heart > Heart > Non > Non ... is one way
Heart > Heart > Non > Heart > Non ... is another way
etc.
And there's many ways of getting 3 hearts and 2 nonhearts (5! / 3!2! ways infact). Each of these ways has it's own assigned probability; it's conditional since each card taken affects the probability of the next card taken, and so on.
If you work out the probability for each way, then sum them, you should get the probability of 3 hearts, 2 nonhearts. But this is clearly a longer method!Last edited by Physics Enemy; 06122010 at 12:56. 
Physics Enemy
 Follow
 20 followers
 19 badges
 Send a private message to Physics Enemy
 Thread Starter
Offline19ReputationRep: Follow
 6
 06122010 12:54
(Original post by Get me off the £\?%!^@ computer)
The cards are distinct.
EDIT: On the sweets Q I tried my method of finding the conditional probabilities for each of the ways, then summing, and it works perfectly. You just end up summing the probabilities assigned to each permutation to get your answer. The counting trick works very nicely though and is much quicker. :)Last edited by Physics Enemy; 06122010 at 13:17. 
 Follow
 7
 06122010 13:22
(Original post by Physics Enemy)
To add, I can see how this is a good trick for the sake of calculating probability:
Treating the cards as distinct allows us to have 52C5 unique 5sets, and 13C3 unique 3sets of hearts, and 39C2 unique 2sets of nonhearts. 13C3x39C2 gives us the number of 5sets with 3 hearts and 2 nonhearts. Dividing this by 52C5 gives us the relative frequency of obtaining such a set out of all the sets possible, and thus it's probability.
I guess, as this trick seems a little counter intuitive at first, how else could one do the Q? That got me thinking. I have a pack of 52 with 39 nonhearts and 13 hearts. I want to know the probability of selecting 5 cards such that 3 are hearts, and 2 are nonhearts.
Heart > Heart > Heart > Non > Non ... is one way
Heart > Heart > Non > Heart > Non ... is another way
etc.
And there's many ways of getting 3 hearts and 2 nonhearts (5! / 3!2! ways infact). Each of these ways has it's own assigned probability; it's conditional since each card taken affects the probability of the next card taken, and so on.
If you work out the probability for each way, then sum them, you should get the probability of 3 hearts, 2 nonhearts. But this is clearly a longer method!
To get the probability of 3 hearts then 2 nonhearts, think about how many cards of each type are left in the pack as you pull out each card, so you should get the probability as (13/52)*(12/51)*(11/50)*(39/49)*(38/48). You can then calculate this and multiply it by 5! / (3!2!) to get your final answer.
With your billion balls you do need to do a similar sort of trick. The probability of getting red,red is not the same as the probability of getting red,blue in that order. This is because once you've chosen your red ball, there are 0.5billion1 red balls left and 0.5billion blue balls left so you are slightly more likely to have your next ball as blue rather than red. Of course in this case since there are so many balls you might consider making approximations, e.g. by saying that once you have chosen one red ball, there are an equal number of red and blue balls left. But with 52 cards, you can't take this approach. 
Physics Enemy
 Follow
 20 followers
 19 badges
 Send a private message to Physics Enemy
 Thread Starter
Offline19ReputationRep: Follow
 8
 06122010 14:36
(Original post by ttoby)
That is a valid method. In fact it's the method I would have used if I hadn't seen the answers. What I would have done for that is calculated the probability of getting heart, heart, heart, non, non (in that order) then multiplied it by 5! / (3!2!) because each ordering of 3 hearts/2 non is equally likely.
Heart, Heart, Heart, Non, Non : P = (13/52)*(12/51)*(11/50)*(39/49)*(38/48)
Heart, Non, Heart, Non, Heart : P = (13/52)*(39/51)*(12/50)*(38/49)*(11/48)
etc.
EDIT: I guess you always have 13, 12, 11, 39, 38 in the numerator and 52, 51, 50, 49, 48 in the denominator. Doesn't matter which way round, works out the same with multiplication. Is there a more intuitive reason though that you spotted?(Original post by ttoby)
To get the probability of 3 hearts then 2 nonhearts, think about how many cards of each type are left in the pack as you pull out each card, so you should get the probability as (13/52)*(12/51)*(11/50)*(39/49)*(38/48). You can then calculate this and multiply it by 5! / (3!2!) to get your final answer.
EDIT: I see it with regards to the numbers in the numerator/denominator always being the same, but did you spot it differently?(Original post by ttoby)
With your billion balls you do need to do a similar sort of trick. The probability of getting red,red is not the same as the probability of getting red,blue in that order. This is because once you've chosen your red ball, there are 0.5billion1 red balls left and 0.5billion blue balls left so you are slightly more likely to have your next ball as blue rather than red. Of course in this case since there are so many balls you might consider making approximations, e.g. by saying that once you have chosen one red ball, there are an equal number of red and blue balls left. But with 52 cards, you can't take this approach.Last edited by Physics Enemy; 06122010 at 14:56. 
 Follow
 9
 06122010 20:42
(Original post by Physics Enemy)
I didn't realise the 10 probabilities are equal. Care to explain why? I tried a couple below; they´re equal, but the fractions are different:
Heart, Heart, Heart, Non, Non : P = (13/52)*(12/51)*(11/50)*(39/49)*(38/48)
Heart, Non, Heart, Non, Heart : P = (13/52)*(39/51)*(12/50)*(38/49)*(11/48)
etc.
EDIT: I guess you always have 13, 12, 11, 39, 38 in the numerator and 52, 51, 50, 49, 48 in the denominator. Doesn't matter which way round, works out the same with multiplication. Is there a more intuitive reason though that you spotted?
Yes. But I don't see why the probabilities work out to be the same for all 10 ways. See above. Maybe I missed something obvious.
EDIT: I see it with regards to the numbers in the numerator/denominator always being the same, but did you spot it differently?
Yep. I tried the sweets Q using my approach and summing all the ways, and I got the same answers as using the book's clever combinations trick. So both ways work; I just found the 'lets say they´re distinct then use the teams argument´to be a little counterintuitive at first.
You could use the lottery analogy here. Ignoring the bonus ball, if you take some combination of balls coming out of the machine then each possible ordering of the balls is equally likely because all of the balls are identical apart from the number printed on them. 
Physics Enemy
 Follow
 20 followers
 19 badges
 Send a private message to Physics Enemy
 Thread Starter
Offline19ReputationRep: Follow
 10
 06122010 23:03
(Original post by ttoby)
Since each card is just as likely as any other card to be chosen then any arrangement of heart,heart,heart,non,non is equally likely. The cards are stacked in a random order so there's no reason for one type of card to be more likely to appear earlier than latter.
Of course, that's why they say 'Find P(3 hearts, 2 nonhearts)' rather than average probability; it implies the order doesn't alter the probability.(Original post by ttoby)
You could use the lottery analogy here. Ignoring the bonus ball, if you take some combination of balls coming out of the machine then each possible ordering of the balls is equally likely because all of the balls are identical apart from the number printed on them.
Thanks so much for all your help!
Reply
Submit reply
Related discussions:
 IB Students: What are your extended essay topics?
 AQA Core 4  Monday 10th June 2013 (AM)  Official Thread
 The Ultimate "OMG Help me with my EE" Thread
 IB Students: What are your extended essay topics?
 The Ultimate "OMG Help me with my EE" Thread
 AQA Chemistry Unit 1  [23rd May 2014]AM
 Moderation statistics :)
 Oxford Maths Admissions Test 2008
 The "Am I good enough for Investment Banking/Consultancy?" ...
 Undergrad Medicine 2018 Entry Discussion
TSR Support Team
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
This forum is supported by:
 SherlockHolmes
 Notnek
 charco
 Mr M
 TSR Moderator
 Nirgilis
 usycool1
 Changing Skies
 James A
 rayquaza17
 RDKGames
 randdom
 davros
 Gingerbread101
 Kvothe the Arcane
 The Financier
 The Empire Odyssey
 Protostar
 TheConfusedMedic
 nisha.sri
 Reality Check
 claireestelle
 Doonesbury
 furryface12
 Amefish
 harryleavey
 Lemur14
 brainzistheword
 Rexar
 Sonechka
 LeCroissant
 EstelOfTheEyrie
 CoffeeAndPolitics
 an_atheist
 Moltenmo
Updated: December 6, 2010
Share this discussion:
Tweet