You are Here: Home >< Maths

# C1 Question (stupid question) Watch

1. Hello , I need a bit of help sorry if this is a stupid question, but its confusing the heck out of me.

Here is the question and how the book solves the question.

a) I got correct. so no issue.
bi) i got it right. the graph is moving -2 in the x-direction each x coordinate of the orignal graph will be shifted by -2, which gives new x coordinates of 2 and -2. As for the y coordinate this is what I did
I replaced x in the original equation f(x)=x(x-4) with (x+2) to get y= (x+2)(x-2).
i put x=0 and got 2x-2 = -4 . so the y coordinate -4 which is correct.

MY QUESITON 1
my quesiton is i dont see any working to find the y coordinate in part bi. which makes me think im doing it wrong. can you see where i have gone wrong

MY QUESITON 2

why dont they have any working for the y intercept.

Thanks and sorry if this is a silly question
2. ive been waiting a whole hour and still no reply
3. What do you need help with? Do you need help with finding where the lines cross the axes in part c) of the question?
4. 1) You don't need to do any more working for the minimum because you know that since f(x) is always greater than or equal to -4, then f(stuff) is always greater than or equal to -4, whatever 'stuff' is.

2) I'm not sure what you're asking. They increase all y coordinates by 4 if y is now f(x)+4 as opposed to just f(x)
5. QUESTION 2:

To find the y-intercept, put in x=0 in the function.

Not sure what your first question is, do you want to find the coordinates of the minimum point?
6. Most of the replies seem confused by my quesiton. Sorry. Let me try and explain again.

I done part a and had no problems.

part bi is where im getting confused.

Basically the questions asking you to apply the transformation y=f(x+2) to the curve f(x)=x(x-4)

The curve is being moved by -2 along the x axis, this means the new x coordinates will be -2 and 2.

I get that bit.

So lets say i drew on my curve crossing the x-axis at -2 and 2.

I can see that the curve intercepts the y-axis. so i obviously have to label that on otherwise il loose marks and i dont know what it is. so i try and find it. I replaced x in the original equation f(x)=x(x-4) with (x+2) to get y= (x+2)(x-2).
i put x=0 and got 2x-2 = -4 . so the y coordinate -4

which i now label on the graph.

what i dont get is for their working on bi (take a look at the pic for Bi) you will see their is no working to find the y-coordinate. I understand why there isn't any working for the x coordinate , but i dont understand why there is no working for the y coordinate. this is were im thinking I am supposed to have calculated the y-intercept a different way. Because my way took some time and on their "how to do it" marking scheme. there is no calcultion for the y-intercept.

I hope that clears things
7. (Original post by jayseanfan)
Most of the replies seem confused by my quesiton. Sorry. Let me try and explain again.

I done part a and had no problems.

part bi is where im getting confused.

Basically the questions asking you to apply the transformation y=f(x+2) to the curve f(x)=x(x-4)

The curve is being moved by -2 along the x axis, this means the new x coordinates will be -2 and 2.

I get that bit.

So lets say i drew on my curve crossing the x-axis at -2 and 2.

I can see that the curve intercepts the y-axis. so i obviously have to label that on otherwise il loose marks and i dont know what it is. so i try and find it. I replaced x in the original equation f(x)=x(x-4) with (x+2) to get y= (x+2)(x-2).
i put x=0 and got 2x-2 = -4 . so the y coordinate -4

which i now label on the graph.

what i dont get is for their working on bi (take a look at the pic for Bi) you will see their is no working to find the y-coordinate. I understand why there isn't any working for the x coordinate , but i dont understand why there is no working for the y coordinate. this is were im thinking I am supposed to have calculated the y-intercept a different way. Because my way took some time and on their &quot;how to do it&quot; marking scheme. there is no calcultion for the y-intercept.

I hope that clears things
In the answers for part c, they do calculate the axis intersections (including the one you are referring to). So what they probably expect you to do is sketch the graphs in part b, then do part c and once you know the required axis intersections to go back and label them on your graphs.

Probably the reason why they split this bit into a separate part is to make sure that you do actually go to the trouble of calculating the intersections, rather than just leaving them unlabelled on your sketch.
8. (Original post by jayseanfan)
Most of the replies seem confused by my quesiton. Sorry. Let me try and explain again.

I done part a and had no problems.

part bi is where im getting confused.

Basically the questions asking you to apply the transformation y=f(x+2) to the curve f(x)=x(x-4)

The curve is being moved by -2 along the x axis, this means the new x coordinates will be -2 and 2.

I get that bit.

So lets say i drew on my curve crossing the x-axis at -2 and 2.

I can see that the curve intercepts the y-axis. so i obviously have to label that on otherwise il loose marks and i dont know what it is. so i try and find it. I replaced x in the original equation f(x)=x(x-4) with (x+2) to get y= (x+2)(x-2).
i put x=0 and got 2x-2 = -4 . so the y coordinate -4

which i now label on the graph.

what i dont get is for their working on bi (take a look at the pic for Bi) you will see their is no working to find the y-coordinate. I understand why there isn't any working for the x coordinate , but i dont understand why there is no working for the y coordinate. this is were im thinking I am supposed to have calculated the y-intercept a different way. Because my way took some time and on their "how to do it" marking scheme. there is no calcultion for the y-intercept.

I hope that clears things
It's probably because they didn't believe working was required, I mean you only have 2 terms to multiply which is reasonably easy to do. It's not like you would lose any marks for writing it out in an exam (in which i would recommend writing it out). What you have done is fine.
9. (Original post by jayseanfan)
Most of the replies seem confused by my quesiton. Sorry. Let me try and explain again.

I done part a and had no problems.

part bi is where im getting confused.

Basically the questions asking you to apply the transformation y=f(x+2) to the curve f(x)=x(x-4)

The curve is being moved by -2 along the x axis, this means the new x coordinates will be -2 and 2.

I get that bit.

So lets say i drew on my curve crossing the x-axis at -2 and 2.

I can see that the curve intercepts the y-axis. so i obviously have to label that on otherwise il loose marks and i dont know what it is. so i try and find it. I replaced x in the original equation f(x)=x(x-4) with (x+2) to get y= (x+2)(x-2).
i put x=0 and got 2x-2 = -4 . so the y coordinate -4

which i now label on the graph.

what i dont get is for their working on bi (take a look at the pic for Bi) you will see their is no working to find the y-coordinate. I understand why there isn't any working for the x coordinate , but i dont understand why there is no working for the y coordinate. this is were im thinking I am supposed to have calculated the y-intercept a different way. Because my way took some time and on their "how to do it" marking scheme. there is no calcultion for the y-intercept.

I hope that clears things
I think the reason there is no working for the y-coordinate is because it is very clear from the graphs.
10. (Original post by chrypton)
I think the reason there is no working for the y-coordinate is because it is very clear from the graphs.
ah yes that's true, in this sort of equation, distance between the two points of intersection=distance above or below x axis, ie 2-(-2)=4, as the graph has a U shape, the point of intersection =-4
11. (Original post by ttoby)
In the answers for part c, they do calculate the axis intersections (including the one you are referring to). So what they probably expect you to do is sketch the graphs in part b, then do part c and once you know the required axis intersections to go back and label them on your graphs.

Probably the reason why they split this bit into a separate part is to make sure that you do actually go to the trouble of calculating the intersections, rather than just leaving them unlabelled on your sketch.
This is what I though too. But then i dont get how you are supposed to sketch BII.

Because yes you know the graph is translated by +4 in the y axis. and since the original y interception is at 0 this means the curve will cut 4. but how are you supposed to know that the graph just touches the x-axis at 2? I could have draw it like this

i wouldn't have know the curve touches the x-axis at 2 till i get to part c and calculated the x intercept (which is not a intercept in this case but you know what i mean). say there wasn't a part c ?

Im so confused. I understand the general concept but im getting confused by when your supposed to do what.
12. (Original post by jayseanfan)
This is what I though too. But then i dont get how you are supposed to sketch BII.

Because yes you know the graph is translated by +4 in the y axis. and since the original y interception is at 0 this means the curve will cut 4. but how are you supposed to know that the graph just touches the x-axis at 2? I could have draw it like this

i wouldn't have know the curve touches the x-axis at 2 its till i get to part c and calculated the x intercept (which is not a intercept in this case but you know what i mean). say there wasn't a part c ?

Im so confused. I understand the general concept but im getting confused by when your supposed to do what.
Since you were able to sketch b)i) and found the y-intercept to be (-4,0) you know that when you are translating the graph +4, the y-coordinate of the minimum point will be -4+4=0.
13. (Original post by jayseanfan)
This is what I though too. But then i dont get how you are supposed to sketch BII.

Because yes you know the graph is translated by +4 in the y axis. and since the original y interception is at 0 this means the curve will cut 4. but how are you supposed to know that the graph just touches the x-axis at 2? I could have draw it like this

i wouldn't have know the curve touches the x-axis at 2 till i get to part c and calculated the x intercept (which is not a intercept in this case but you know what i mean). say there wasn't a part c ?

Im so confused. I understand the general concept but im getting confused by when your supposed to do what.
again refer to my last post, use that on the first graph and you'll see that the greatest depth that the curve may be below the x axis is 4, raising the curve by 4 will therefore mean that the curve only touches the x axis.
14. (Original post by roar558)
ah yes that's true, in this sort of equation, distance between the two points of intersection=distance above or below x axis, ie 2-(-2)=4, as the graph has a U shape, the point of intersection =-4
I didn't know that rule.

Can i even use it or C1? and when can i use it ? Or am i better of translating the graph accoding to the rule and then put x=0 or y=0 to see where the curve intercepts the x or y axis?
15. so what would u guys say to conclude

is it okay if i just apply the transformaiton first

and then just calculate the x intercept by y=0 OR the y intercept by x=0
16. (Original post by jayseanfan)
I didn't know that rule.

Can i even use it or C1? and when can i use it ? Or am i better of translating the graph accoding to the rule and then put x=0 or y=0 to see where the curve intercepts the x or y axis?
I'm not sure it is in a text book, it's caused by the shape of the graph and so is an easy way to find certain points of intersection. However I would check with your teacher/lecturer whether or not it would be accepted.
17. (Original post by jayseanfan)
so what would u guys say to conclude

is it okay if i just apply the transformaiton first

and then just calculate the x intercept by y=0 OR the y intercept by x=0
You shouldn't lose any marks for doing it that way.
18. (Original post by jayseanfan)
I could have draw it like this
This reminds me of another question I was answering the other day. As a general piece of advice, if you're sketching a graph and you're not sure if your curve goes above or below an axis, point or other curve then always do a calculation to determine which side to draw your line.

In this case, that calculation would be finding the minimum point of the curve to see if it's above or below or touching the x axis.

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: December 8, 2010

Find out how.

### Want £10K to start a business?

Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.