Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I'm having with this question just cant see the issues involved to provoke any real thought on it.

    What are the advantages and disadvantages to the historian of adopting a sociological approach to the past?

    Thanks if you decide to help me
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I think that means something to do with social history which was 'invented' in the 1960s -- previously historians have been 'whiggish' after Cromwell i.e. they saw things as a line of progression or 'tory' which means that they view history as 'top-down' i.e. history of the élites what activities they do e.g. what they do in politics and is more like what happened on a specific day etc.
    Social history is the 'new history' i.e. most modern historians and universities take this modern approach by studying from 'down-below' i.e. the everyday people.

    So to answer your question I think it means what are the advantages of studying this down-below approach = that it gives a wider perspective of what the population thought at the time and that's all I can think of sry
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Did TEF Bronze Award affect your UCAS choices?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.