The 'alternative ' or 'new' view of parliamentary sovereignty is logically more compelling than, and has in the past decades gained significant ground over, the 'orthodox' view. If ever the courts get a chance to rule conclusively on which view is 'correct' it is almost certain that they would choose the former over the latter". Critically assess that statement.
please guys help me on how to tackle this qusetion. thanks
Loughborough at number one