Foster doing nothing, Ben as my QB in three leagues and I picked Charles high in two who I now have to replace with I have no idea who
At least I should be free on Sunday to field proper teams.
Any ideas who I should try and pick up instead of Charles?
In one I'm thinking of just going with more depth at WR for the W/R position and grabbing Washington.
Depends on who's available in your league. I, too, picked up Nate Washington because he's been consistent in his first 2 games, bound for a TD real soon, and is the number 2 wideout for Ten; plus Hasselbeck (sp?) likes to air it out.
Depends on who's available in your league. I, too, picked up Nate Washington because he's been consistent in his first 2 games, bound for a TD real soon, and is the number 2 wideout for Ten; plus Hasselbeck (sp?) likes to air it out.
I have him as my backup QB and I think he is expected more points then Ben
I may grab a player likely to see more work now he is injured but either way I have to pick soon. I am also out again tomorrow so have to hope lots of things don't change. I'm probably going to take another chance on Foster as I don't have much else to do.
It's a 20 person league, you likely won't get anyone unfortunately.
Nobody excellent, no. But I need to try and pick somebody who may provide some sort of reasonable cover as obviously I have promoted other people to the starting line up now.
Nobody excellent, no. But I need to try and pick somebody who may provide some sort of reasonable cover as obviously I have promoted other people to the starting line up now.
True, try looking for players who play on teams with a bunch of injuries, they're your best bet.
I have him as my backup QB and I think he is expected more points then Ben
I may grab a player likely to see more work now he is injured but either way I have to pick soon. I am also out again tomorrow so have to hope lots of things don't change. I'm probably going to take another chance on Foster as I don't have much else to do.
I hope you're starting Big Ben because they're playing the Colts this week!
I always start him when I can and always will as I think he will find his rhythm eventually
Going to sort my teams in a bit before I go out and hope nothing changes.
Now do I take a risk and put Foster in or just play Knox in in the W/R
Between the 2, put in Knox. Foster won't play, Knox will...despite the Bears O-line being crappy as hell and Cutler getting sacked like crazy. Packers have weak coverage on the throw so your best hope is for the Bears O-line to hold up enough for Cutler to air it out to Knox when he's in.
Between the 2, put in Knox. Foster won't play, Knox will...despite the Bears O-line being crappy as hell and Cutler getting sacked like crazy. Packers have weak coverage on the throw so your best hope is for the Bears O-line to hold up enough for Cutler to air it out to Knox when he's in.
I'm starting Vick no doubt. play him. To me it's no longer a risk. They said the whiplash effect was more of the concern.
lol i know i knowww. woodson can't cover the whole field, but look at the last 2 games against the saints and panthers of how much pass yardage was allowed. packers have nothing to really worry about since they practically bounce back almost every time with a score
Between the 2, put in Knox. Foster won't play, Knox will...despite the Bears O-line being crappy as hell and Cutler getting sacked like crazy. Packers have weak coverage on the throw so your best hope is for the Bears O-line to hold up enough for Cutler to air it out to Knox when he's in.
I'm starting Vick no doubt. play him. To me it's no longer a risk. They said the whiplash effect was more of the concern.
I did go with Knox in the end and it was a good decision as for the third week in a row I completely forgot to log in and make last minute changes but it hasn't hurt me as bad this week I don think - I'm about to go and look now though.