The Student Room Group

Help with this generalised eigenvector

I was wondering if anyone could explain, from the following information that we put z=0, when I have always, when given the information that follows thought we could let z equal anything and so let z = 1.

We have, with:

λ=1\lambda = 1

A=[000120010] A = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\1 & 2 & 0 \\0 & 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix}

v1=[001] v_1 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}

(AλI)v2=v1 (A - \lambda I)v_2 = v_1

[000120010][xyz]=[001]\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\1 & 2 & 0 \\0 & 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}

So we can infer:

y=1y = 1

x+2y=0x=2x + 2y= 0 \Rightarrow x= -2

We also have:

(AλI)2v2=0 (A - \lambda I)^2v_2 = 0

[000240120][xyz]=[000]\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\2 & 4 & 0 \\1 & 2 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}

So we still have the same equations as before.

0x+0y+0z=0 0x + 0y + 0z = 0
x+2y+0z=0 x + 2y + 0z = 0
0x+y+0z=0 0x + y + 0z = 0

I thought in a case like this that z could take any value so we let z = 1. But z = 0, can anyone explain why? I think I should point out that v_1 and v_2 need to be linearly independent, so if putting z = 0 makes them linearly independent, could someone explain why.

v2=[xyz]=[210] v_2 = \begin{bmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} -2 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}

Thanks guys.
(edited 13 years ago)
Reply 1
Original post by TheBhramaBull
.


Any value of z will give you the property you want for v2v_2. However, letting z=0 makes v2v_2 orthogonal to v1v_1, so it may be preferable to let z=0.

In reference to your linear independence bit at the end - do you know the definition of linear independence? If you can visualise how a set of linearly independent vectors in R3\mathbb{R}^3 looks, then it should be fairly easy to see when v1v_1 and v2v_2 are linearly independent.

Quick Reply

Latest