The Student Room Group
un+1=3un+2u_{n+1} = 3u_{n}+2 and un=2.3n11u_{n} = 2.3^{n-1}-1
u2=3u1+2=5=2.3211u_{2} = 3u_{1}+2 = 5 = 2.3^{2-1}-1
So true for first step. Assume true for n=k
uk+1=3[2.3k11]+2=2.3.3k13+2=2.3k1u_{k+1} = 3\big[2.3^{k-1}-1\big]+2 = 2.3.3^{k-1}-3+2 = 2.3^{k}-1
This is exactly what you'd have if n=k+1, therefore inductive step proved.

Next one :

xk+1yk+1=xk(xy)+y(xkyk)x^{k+1}-y^{k+1} = x^{k}(x-y)+y(x^{k}-y^{k})
Consider k=0, this implies that x1y1x^{1}-y^{1} is divisible by (x-y). But then the expression tells you if xkykx^{k}-y^{k} is divisible by x-y then so is xk+1yk+1x^{k+1}-y^{k+1} because you'd have
xk+1yk+1=xk(xy)+y(xy)Tx^{k+1}-y^{k+1} = x^{k}(x-y) + y(x-y)T where (xy)T=xkyk(x-y)T = x^{k}-y^{k}

You don't really need to do an inductive step, just realise what the expression tells you.
Reply 2
Sure. For the first one, the base case is n=1, and it's easy to check that 2.31-1 - 1 = 1.

Then assume that un =2.3n-1 - 1, and show that the formula holds for n+1:

un+1 = 3un + 2 = 3(2.3n-1 - 1) + 2 = 2.3n+1 - 1 - 1

Thus if the formula works for n, then it works for n+1. But it works for 1, so it works for 2, and 3, and 4 etc, and so it is proved by mathematical induction.

Edit: Dammit George!