The Student Room Group

Reply 1

u_{n+1} = 3u_{n}+2 and u_{n} = 2.3^{n-1}-1
u_{2} = 3u_{1}+2 = 5 = 2.3^{2-1}-1
So true for first step. Assume true for n=k
u_{k+1} = 3\big[2.3^{k-1}-1\big]+2 = 2.3.3^{k-1}-3+2 = 2.3^{k}-1
This is exactly what you'd have if n=k+1, therefore inductive step proved.

Next one :

x^{k+1}-y^{k+1} = x^{k}(x-y)+y(x^{k}-y^{k})
Consider k=0, this implies that x^{1}-y^{1} is divisible by (x-y). But then the expression tells you if x^{k}-y^{k} is divisible by x-y then so is x^{k+1}-y^{k+1} because you'd have
x^{k+1}-y^{k+1} = x^{k}(x-y) + y(x-y)T where (x-y)T = x^{k}-y^{k}

You don't really need to do an inductive step, just realise what the expression tells you.

Reply 2

Sure. For the first one, the base case is n=1, and it's easy to check that 2.31-1 - 1 = 1.

Then assume that un =2.3n-1 - 1, and show that the formula holds for n+1:

un+1 = 3un + 2 = 3(2.3n-1 - 1) + 2 = 2.3n+1 - 1 - 1

Thus if the formula works for n, then it works for n+1. But it works for 1, so it works for 2, and 3, and 4 etc, and so it is proved by mathematical induction.

Edit: Dammit George!