Should prostitution be made legal? Watch

This discussion is closed.
Vienna
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#181
Report 16 years ago
#181
(Original post by Eternal Idol)
1. society with different internal groups: the existence of groups with different ethnic, religious, or political backgrounds within one society


YES SHUT UP.

notice the little words, groups and backgrounds?

communism is not a group and does not settle for background, that is the clear difference that we have been trying to hammer home.
in contradicts plurality.
0
zizero
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#182
Report 16 years ago
#182
(Original post by vienna95)
ask eternal pain i mean idol, he eats encarta for breakfast..hehe.
Let's get back to the prostitution issue.

I'm especially interested in what vienna95 has to say. She is one of the few posters who oppose legalisation of prostitution. I have answered her arguments about prostitution and she still has not responded to my last counter-argument. Yet, she has found plenty of energy to talk about lots of issues not related to this thread. Is she running away from the initial topic?

I don't think so.
0
EI_123
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#183
Report 16 years ago
#183
(Original post by vienna95)
notice the little words, groups and backgrounds?

communism is not a group and does not settle for background, that is the clear difference that we have been trying to hammer home.
in contradicts plurality.
The attack to communist people (that conforms a group) is an act that isn't pluralism.
0
ben2111
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#184
Report 16 years ago
#184
(Original post by vienna95)
notice the little words, groups and backgrounds?

communism is not a group and does not settle for background, that is the clear difference that we have been trying to hammer home.
in contradicts plurality.
WHAT??? O fcourse, we were talking about communists, people, a group. The ideoplogy itself was not interesting, not for McCarthy or for anybody cause it is just written down. Only when people raise their voice it becomes a threat for them
0
Vienna
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#185
Report 16 years ago
#185
(Original post by Eternal Idol)
The attack to communist people (that conforms a group) is an act that isn't pluralism.
but it is in the interest of plurality. bearing in mind the other circumstances surrounding communism at the time, this clearly does not jeopardise the claim the anti-communism threatens pluralism.
0
ben2111
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#186
Report 16 years ago
#186
(Original post by zizero)
Let's get back to the prostitution issue.

I'm especially interested in what vienna95 has to say. She is one of the few posters who oppose legalisation of prostitution. I have answered her arguments about prostitution and she still has not responded to my last counter-argument. Yet, she has found plenty of energy to talk about lots of issues not related to this thread. Is she running away from the initial topic?

I don't think so.
You are trying the impossible! Bring a thread back to the initial topic while being under crossfire ;-)
0
ben2111
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#187
Report 16 years ago
#187
(Original post by vienna95)
but it is in the interest of plurality. bearing in mind the other circumstances surrounding communism at the time, this clearly does not jeopardise the claim the anti-communism threatens pluralism.
which circumstances?
0
EI_123
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#188
Report 16 years ago
#188
(Original post by ben2111)
WHAT??? O fcourse, we were talking about communists, people, a group. The ideoplogy itself was not interesting, not for McCarthy or for anybody cause it is just written down. Only when people raise their voice it becomes a threat for them
Ben, is pointless, I think that she doesn't have a heart or a brain.
Most probably she's a computer application programmed to say everything that is wrong to any normal person.
0
JSM
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#189
Report 16 years ago
#189
(Original post by ben2111)
OH MY GOD where the f**k do you read such ****? Socialists DO NOT WANT TO INSTALL A TOTALITARIAN STATE!!!! That is a form of the ideology of socialism (or marxism) that is called COMMUNISM even though not even the word communism implies a totalitarian state.
um, yes they do, why do socialists not even understnad their own doctrine, how can you live in a planned economy without being totalitarian.
0
EI_123
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#190
Report 16 years ago
#190
(Original post by JSM)
um, yes they do, why do socialists not even understnad their own doctrine, how can you live in a planned economy without being totalitarian.
The economy doesn't imply the government, Hitler and Mussolini had a really regular AMERICAN LIKE capitalist economy ...
0
Vienna
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#191
Report 16 years ago
#191
(Original post by Eternal Idol)
Ben, is pointless, I think that she doesn't have a heart or a brain.
Most probably she's a computer application programmed to say everything that is wrong to any normal person.
ooh, dear.
0
JSM
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#192
Report 16 years ago
#192
(Original post by ben2111)
Sorry but where did you enjoy history lessons? Mandela is a terrorist? CAn you give me one example? Mandela is one of the most impressive figures of the century, do me the favour and dont insult him without good reason.
mandela was a terrorist, he led the Umbgwe of the spear or something, blowing up buildings = terrorist

*******s theyd teache me anythign that is not politically correct in history
0
ben2111
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#193
Report 16 years ago
#193
(Original post by JSM)
um, yes they do, why do socialists not even understnad their own doctrine, how can you live in a planned economy without being totalitarian.
YOU DID NOT GET MY POINT

Socialism is a philosophy! Socialists were the thinkers that followed marx and other inentors of the idea. the planned economy was what happened in russia and I think I mentioned it already it is called COMMUNISM and not even that term is correct
0
Vienna
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#194
Report 16 years ago
#194
(Original post by Eternal Idol)
The economy doesn't imply the government, Hitler and Mussolini had a really regular AMERICAN LIKE capitalist economy ...
hitler was socialist or is this sarcasm?
0
JSM
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#195
Report 16 years ago
#195
(Original post by ben2111)
Maybe they are talking about the Bavarian government
no, they are not talking about anything, i am, your chancellor is pushing through labour reforms
0
JSM
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#196
Report 16 years ago
#196
(Original post by Eternal Idol)
Pluralism must mean freedom of ideas and mcarthysm is anything except that, if you don't agree with this I don't want to talk to you anymore.
pluralism, really does not work, how can you have pluralism without shushing some groups of society, therefore not making it pluralistic. America was as pluralistic as possible.
0
ben2111
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#197
Report 16 years ago
#197
(Original post by JSM)
mandela was a terrorist, he led the Umbgwe of the spear or something, blowing up buildings = terrorist

*******s theyd teache me anythign that is not politically correct in history
You better pay attention next time

first do you think the apartheid regime was right? If you answer yes I will bever talk to you again but go right ahead

second mandela was the leader of the PEACEFUL resistance, he spent 27 years in jail and still preached his followers not to use any violence. I do not know if you or I would have this mental strength

but not to get you all insecure YES, mandela participated in ONE action which was destroying an electricity cable.
0
EI_123
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#198
Report 16 years ago
#198
(Original post by JSM)
pluralism, really does not work, how can you have pluralism without shushing some groups of society, therefore not making it pluralistic. America was as pluralistic as possible.
As possible to what they need or want in the moment, not as maximum.
0
ben2111
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#199
Report 16 years ago
#199
(Original post by JSM)
pluralism, really does not work, how can you have pluralism without shushing some groups of society, therefore not making it pluralistic. America was as pluralistic as possible.
ouch
0
ben2111
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#200
Report 16 years ago
#200
if you want to get first han info JSM read "A lang walk to freedom" by mandela or simply a book about modern south african history. Did you know even 90% of the white south africans adore mandela? At least as a person, even though their loves have not improved by abolishing apartheid
0
X
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

People at uni: do initiations (like heavy drinking) put you off joining sports societies?

Yes (211)
67.63%
No (101)
32.37%

Watched Threads

View All