Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    I have just watched Chronicle, it is seriously one of the best films I have seen this year, a must watch IMO...
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by arnoob)
    I have just watched Chronicle, it is seriously one of the best films I have seen this year, a must watch IMO...
    I'll get to it!
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by arnoob)
    I have just watched Chronicle, it is seriously one of the best films I have seen this year, a must watch IMO...
    :erm: Really?
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    hahahaha..... reeeaaaaaaaaaaly?

    Yeah we were ready to leave out of boredom by halfway through and then they chucked in a load of crashing and banging at the end. It wasn't much less boring but was at least a change in pace. One of the most competent but utterly forgettable films of the year. WE GOTZ MAJIK POWERZ BUT WIL THEY BE UZED FER GOOD OR BAD.....
    • PS Reviewer
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    PS Reviewer
    Study Helper
    (Original post by arnoob)
    I have just watched Chronicle, it is seriously one of the best films I have seen this year, a must watch IMO...
    I was alright. Just a little... predictable and cliched :erm: . The kid got really annoying for me though, so maybe I'm a little bias
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Revent)
    Just saw Spiderman. I love comics. I love CGI. Therefore, I loved it! :love:
    I like how they made it slightly more comedic than the other trilogy, I felt it was truer to the original Spiderman comics. I also think Andrew Garfield pulled off the role better than Tobey Maguire.

    I didn't like the product placement of Bing.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by T-Toe)
    Apparently The Amazing Spiderman is not Amazing but still worth a watch. I still haven't seen the Avengers
    I'm not too interesting in watching the Amazing Spiderman because they have changed the actor and I'm sick of when they do this and they don't explain what happened and they go along as if they always had that face- at least in Doctor Who they explain whats happened.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Dalek1099)
    I'm not too interesting in watching the Amazing Spiderman because they have changed the actor and I'm sick of when they do this and they don't explain what happened and they go along as if they always had that face- at least in Doctor Who they explain whats happened.
    Are you kidding me?
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by cambo211)
    Are you kidding me?
    Why would I be kidding you?and if you thought my point was wrong,you could have at least posted your views,with reasons:confused:
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Dalek1099)
    Why would I be kidding you?and if you thought my point was wrong,you could have at least posted your views,with reasons:confused:
    Herp-a-derp.

    This isn't Spiderman 4. It's not the same character Toby Maguire played. From this films viewpoint Toby Maguire doesn't exist.

    The actor didn't change, because the 3 previous films never happened.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Why don't they ever explain James Bond's face change?

    PLOTHOLE.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Revent)
    :erm: Really?
    (Original post by Mister Dead)
    hahahaha..... reeeaaaaaaaaaaly?

    Yeah we were ready to leave out of boredom by halfway through and then they chucked in a load of crashing and banging at the end. It wasn't much less boring but was at least a change in pace. One of the most competent but utterly forgettable films of the year. WE GOTZ MAJIK POWERZ BUT WIL THEY BE UZED FER GOOD OR BAD.....
    (Original post by Nirgilis)
    I was alright. Just a little... predictable and cliched :erm: . The kid got really annoying for me though, so maybe I'm a little bias
    Well the reviews can back me up when I say that it is a really good film
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Colonel.)
    Why don't they ever explain James Bond's face change?

    PLOTHOLE.
    I always took it for granted that the answer, for everything unknown- never mind just Bond- was Aliens.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by arnoob)
    Well the reviews can back me up when I say that it is a really good film
    Meh, it had potential but Andrew was such a whiny *****. Like seriously, Apex predator? :mmm:


    (Original post by Pi!)
    I like how they made it slightly more comedic than the other trilogy, I felt it was truer to the original Spiderman comics. I also think Andrew Garfield pulled off the role better than Tobey Maguire.

    I didn't like the product placement of Bing.
    Yeah, definitely
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Did you watch after the credits? If so, who has the guy curts was talking to at Jail
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Revent)
    Meh, it had potential but Andrew was such a whiny *****. Like seriously, Apex predator? :mmm: [/spoiler]
    I do admit, that wanting to be a Apex predator is a pathetic reason for his actions
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    15
    (Original post by Colonel.)
    Why don't they ever explain James Bond's face change?

    PLOTHOLE.
    I've adopted the theory that James Bond is just a codename placeholder like 007. And it's passed on when one is killed or retires.

    (Original post by Dalek1099)
    I'm not too interesting in watching the Amazing Spiderman because they have changed the actor and I'm sick of when they do this and they don't explain what happened and they go along as if they always had that face- at least in Doctor Who they explain whats happened.
    It was worse in Batman: they changed the face from Keaton/Kilmer/Clooney to Christian Bale and pretended he suffered from some sort of amnesia in not realising he was already Batman in the past 4 films. What's up with that?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    There's a new Disney film being released in 2013 called Oz: the Great and Powerful. Apparently it's going to be a sequel to the 1939 classic, The Wizard of Oz. I have to say, I really like the look of it. Along with this reinterpretation, there's also going to be an animated version and a CGI/stop-motion version. Can't wait! :excited:

    http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/07/0...-movie-poster/
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by cambo211)
    Herp-a-derp.

    This isn't Spiderman 4. It's not the same character Toby Maguire played. From this films viewpoint Toby Maguire doesn't exist.

    The actor didn't change, because the 3 previous films never happened.
    Its still spiderman though and you can't have two spidermans out of canon with each other-there is only one spiderman.
    Online

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Dalek1099)
    Its still spiderman though and you can't have two spidermans out of canon with each other-there is only one spiderman.
    :lolwut: are you trolling? Seriously?


    This was posted from The Student Room's iPhone/iPad App
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Dalek1099)
    Its still spiderman though and you can't have two spidermans out of canon with each other-there is only one spiderman.
    So you're telling me Michael Keaton is Christian Bale...

    It's all clear to me now :moon:
 
 
 
Poll
Do you agree with the PM's proposal to cut tuition fees for some courses?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.