You are Here: Home >< Physics

# Newton's law? watch

1. A bottle on a table is stationary
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A student wrote this incorrect explanation

The force of gravity pulls the bottle down.
The bottle pushes down on the table, so by Newton’s first law,
the table pushes up with an equal and opposite force.
According to Newton’s third law, if the forces are balanced,
nothing can move

why this is incorrect? everything he said makes a perfect sense
2. (Original post by reb0xx)
A bottle on a table is stationary
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A student wrote this incorrect explanation

The force of gravity pulls the bottle down.
correct

The bottle pushes down on the table, so by Newton’s first law 3rd Law,
the table pushes up with an equal and opposite force. On the bottle.
According to Newton’s third law, if the forces are balanced,
nothing can move
Newton's 3rd Law doesn't say that.

why this is incorrect? everything he said makes a perfect sense
Newton's 3rd law states that the action and reaction are on different objects.
The earth pulls down on the bottle and the bottle pulls up on the earth. These are the action and reaction pair for gravity.

The bottle pushes down on the table and the table pushes up on the bottle.
These are the action/reaction pair for the bottle and table.

How many forces act on the bottle? If the bottle doesn't move, then the forces on it are balanced. There is gravity pulling it downwards and the table pushing upwards. These are not action and reaction in the Newton 3 sense.
The student is getting confused with "normal reaction".
3. (Original post by reb0xx)
A bottle on a table is stationary
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A student wrote this incorrect explanation

The force of gravity pulls the bottle down.
The bottle pushes down on the table, so by Newton’s first law,
the table pushes up with an equal and opposite force.
According to Newton’s third law, if the forces are balanced,
nothing can move

why this is incorrect? everything he said makes a perfect sense
I would correct the "force of gravity" by saying it's the "force of weight"
4. (Original post by gozatron)
I would correct the "force of gravity" by saying it's the "force of weight"
Well, actually weight has the dimension of , and is a force. So there's no need to say something like "force of a force".
5. (Original post by jaroc)
Well, actually weight has the dimension of , and is a force. So there's no need to say something like &quot;force of a force&quot;.
Yes saying "force of weight" is just defining which force your talking about, surely?
6. (Original post by gozatron)
Yes saying "force of weight" is just defining which force your talking about, surely?
Well, I'm certainly not an expert on English language, but I suspect that as you would say 'thrust', not 'force of thrust', or 'drag', not 'force of drag', you would say 'weight', not 'force of weight' alike.

### Related university courses

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: March 20, 2011
Today on TSR

### He lied about his age

Thought he was 19... really he's 14

### University open days

Wed, 25 Jul '18
2. University of Buckingham
Wed, 25 Jul '18
3. Bournemouth University
Wed, 1 Aug '18
Poll

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE