anti white racism. why is it accepted in british society?

Because the vast majority of people in the UK are white, which means white-only organisations that exclude the less represented ethnic minorities are racist. What would be the need for an all-white organisation? It isn't whites who get discriminated against for their skin colour, whereas blacks/Asians clearly do, which is shown in the percentage of blacks/Asians stopped and searched on the street, and the pitifully low percentage of black people in the UK police.

Because the vast majority of people in the UK are white, which means white-only organisations that exclude the less represented ethnic minorities are racist. What would be the need for an all-white organisation? It isn't whites who get discriminated against for their skin colour, whereas blacks/Asians clearly do, which is shown in the percentage of blacks/Asians stopped and searched on the street, and the pitifully low percentage of black people in the UK police.

However, on average, some groups have more job-related abilities, skills and knowledge than other groups. The more valid and reliable the employment tests, the more likely that these differences become apparent...

Without gerrymandering of personnel selection systems, there would likely be far fewer minorities hired for jobs of medium and high cognitive complexity. Thus, one might argue that gerrymandering is ethically justified in order to promote racial diversity at all levels of the occupational hierarchy. However, when racial gerrymandering results in a lower-qualified minority being hiredinstead of a higher-qualified White or Asian, the higher-qualified individual has been excluded because of their race. Thus, one might argue that racial gerrymandering is an unethical practice because it harms individuals because of their race.

there's a percentage of racism in everyone..be it 1 percent...10 percent or 100 percent...black people will be racist to your face...white people tend to do it behind ones back..

ok, i have the quote thing down at last



majority status is the not the point. the majority can still be victims of racism.

I think you will find that white females were also involved in a fair bit of undeniable oppression, enslavement and sometimes torture of coloured people...

There could be no grosser misconception of the realities than is entertained by those who vociferously demand legislation as they call it "against discrimination", whether they be leader-writers of the same kidney and sometimes on the same newspapers which year after year in the 1930s tried to blind this country to the rising peril which confronted it, or archbishops who live in palaces, faring delicately with the bedclothes pulled right up over their heads. They have got it exactly and diametrically wrong.

The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and of resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming.

This is why to enact legislation of the kind before parliament at this moment is to risk throwing a match on to gunpowder. The kindest thing that can be said about those who propose and support it is that they know not what they do.

Because the vast majority of people in the UK are white, which means white-only organisations that exclude the less represented ethnic minorities are racist. What would be the need for an all-white organisation?

It isn't whites who get discriminated against for their skin colour, whereas blacks/Asians clearly do, which is shown in the percentage of blacks/Asians stopped and searched on the street, and the pitifully low percentage of black people in the UK police.

But there are no white-only organisations. That's exactly the point I'm making. The bit in bold is completely irrelevant to my point.




What about black-only organisations? They clearly discriminate against whites(as well as other non-blacks) on the grounds of race.

Its because white left wing sheep follow what the media tell them that diversity is good and organisations celebrating black and asians only are good. In reality black and Asian people are mostly more racist than white people but know they can get away with saying pretty much anything especially black people. Hopefully BNP get into power to put white people first in Britain for the first time since commonwealth large scale immigration.

The BNP will never be in power. I have more chance of scoring a threesome with Jessica Biel and Barak Obama than you have of seeing any political party in power which have no experience in governing a country/understanding economics.

But there are no white-only organisations. That's exactly the point I'm making. The bit in bold is completely irrelevant to my point..

What about black-only organisations? They clearly discriminate against whites(as well as other non-blacks) on the grounds of race.

Each to their own opinion. Britain needs BNP or else more and more white will be the target of racism.

Yes they can still be victims of racism... But they don't need the extra support to help them through it like a "white-only" group, because they are so in the majority they already have that back-up!
If an asian person was a victim of racism, they'd have much more need for a group to help them out, so they have someone to turn to and get advice from.
It's about the minority in the country not feeling singled out and helpless.

You obviously missed my point there. The reason there aren't any is because there is no need for them. Whites aren't discriminated against in anything like the way blacks are in this country, which means there is no need for an all-white organisation, whereas there would be benefits to an all-black organisation.

The reason there are all-black organisations is in order to combat discrimination from white people.

Why would there be white people in an anti-discrimination organisation for black people when whites aren't the ones being discriminated against?

Don't try and turn this around by implying that the black people who run these groups are being racist,

when these groups only exist to combat racism and discrimination from white people.

To use the example of the police force, 96% of the police force in this country are white, so what would be the point of an organisation for white police officers? Only 4% of the police are black, which is a significant example of disproporitonate representation of an ethnic group.

This, by all accounts is down to racism and discrimination, and therefore there are benefits to the organisation for black police officers.

Black people were put through slavery, discrimination, killed for looking at white women, called 2/3 human and as soon as we call you a "honkey" you bitch about it.