Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Hey,
    I have an upcoming moot and am the lead respondant for the following ground of appeal:

    'notwithstanding s. 55(6)(c) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, sexual infidelity should be considered by the jury where it forms a relevant part of the history to the case rather than being the cause of the loss of self-control.'

    I am therefore against this point, however since the introduction of the 2009 act and the abolishment of provocation I am struggling on finding cases as relevant authorities. Do you have any advice on areas I should focus on or relevant case law that might be applicable?

    Many thanks for any input!!
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Facts of the case are:

    David and Laura Nolan were married in 2000 when they were aged 30 and 20 respectively. Laura worked as a cat-walk model and David was her agent. Neither of them wanted to have children at that time, but in 2005, Laura told David she wanted to have a baby and take a couple of years away from work to raise their child. David refused, telling Laura he didn’t want her to lose her looks, and in any event, neither of them could afford to live without her income. He had sexual intercourse with Laura after that time only if he wore a condom.

    In September 2010, Laura was asked to model a new range of clothes for an international fashion house but she had to lose eight kilograms of weight to fit into the tiny clothes. Laura stopped eating all food except for broccoli for a month. This dietary regime caused her insomnia, a feeling of weakness and uncharacteristic outbursts of anger.

    On the 11th October 2010, as Laura was about to start the fashion show, she received a text message telling her that David had been having a number of extra-marital affairs for the past few years and that in 2006, he had fathered a daughter by another woman. She immediately confronted David with this. He replied that the other woman could afford to have kids because her body “wasn’t anything good to look at in the first place.” In a rage, Laura stabbed David to death with a pair of scissors.

    Laura was charged with David’s murder. At the trial, the judge refused to allow the jury to hear evidence of David’s extra-marital affairs because such evidence was inadmissible by s. 55 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. The judge also refused a defence application to adduce expert evidence about Laura’s dietary regime and the possible hormonal imbalances caused by it, because such evidence would be outside any “normal degree of tolerance and self-restraint” that a person of her age and sex in her circumstances might have.

    The jury returned a verdict of guilty on the charge of murder. Laura now appeals to the Court of Appeal on the grounds that:

    My role is the lead respondant for the following ground of appeal:

    1. notwithstanding s. 55(6)(c) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, sexual infidelity should be considered by the jury where it forms a relevant part of the history to the case rather than being the cause of the loss of self-control,
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by bkh)
    Hey,
    I have an upcoming moot and am the lead respondant for the following ground of appeal:

    'notwithstanding s. 55(6)(c) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, sexual infidelity should be considered by the jury where it forms a relevant part of the history to the case rather than being the cause of the loss of self-control.'

    I am therefore against this point, however since the introduction of the 2009 act and the abolishment of provocation I am struggling on finding cases as relevant authorities. Do you have any advice on areas I should focus on or relevant case law that might be applicable?

    Many thanks for any input!!
    Thornton [1996]? It's either that or Ahuwahlia i'm thinking of. I think one of those two argues that a history of domestic abuse is only relevant if it's the trigger rather than the cause. Of course that's on provocation and not sexual infidelity but since you're arguing loss of control should only be based on the trigger events and sexual infidelity is banned as one, it could be helpful.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: March 23, 2011
The home of Results and Clearing

1,109

people online now

1,567,000

students helped last year

University open days

  1. London Metropolitan University
    Undergraduate Open Day Undergraduate
    Sat, 18 Aug '18
  2. Edge Hill University
    All Faculties Undergraduate
    Sat, 18 Aug '18
  3. Bournemouth University
    Clearing Open Day Undergraduate
    Sat, 18 Aug '18
Poll
A-level students - how do you feel about your results?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.