Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Could someone please tell me is these statements are true:

    i) Every Field is a Ring.
    ii) Every Integral Domain is a Ring.
    iii) Every Field is an Integral Domain.
    iv) Every finite Integral Domain is a Field.

    v) Not all Rings are Fields.
    vi) Not all Rings are Integral Domains.
    vii) Not all Integral Domains are Fields.

    Which statements are true and which are false. I am trying to get my head round the connection between them all. Thanks
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Added to this, I have in my notes:

    1)F[x] is an integral domain.
    2)deg(f(x)g(x)) = deg(f(x))+deg(g(x)).
    3) This also holds for R is an ID, but if R is not an ID then it is false.

    Does this mean all ID's have the property of 2) as all ID's are Rings??

    I might be confusing thing here...
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by adie_raz)
    ...
    Basically, all fields are integral domains and all integral domains are rings.

    iv ... err... if a is non-zero then the map f:R->R given by f(x) -> ax is 1-1. As R is finite, f is also onto. So there is some x so that ax=1. So the ring has multiplicative inverses.

    Not all rings are fields. Eg, any ring with zero divisors (the ring of 2x2 real matrices for example).
    Not all rings are IDs. Same counterexample as above.
    Not all IDs are fields. Eg the integers.

    If F is a field then F[x] is an ID. All IDs have property 2 because if f(x) = ax^n + ... + q (a non zero) and g(x) = bx^m + ... + r (b non zero) then f(x)g(x) = abx^(m+n) + ... + qr. In an ID, a and b are non-zero so ab is non-zero. So deg(fg)=m+n=deg(f)+deg(g). If you had polynomials over a non-ID then you could pick a and b to be non-zero but such that ab=0. Then deg(fg) would be less than deg(f)+deg(g).
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    All the statements in your first post are true. I'm not certain on (iv) but I'm pretty sure that is true. To help you understand them, try drawing a picture, i.e.



    Since all fields are rings but not all rings are fields, the set of rings strictly contains the set of fields. You can fill in the rest yourself if you find this helpful.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Thanks you guys, I now need to write this down in the most concise way I can
 
 
 
Poll
Who is your favourite TV detective?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.