I think this is how it really goes:
" I get a big chip on my shoulder cause a lot of people expressed negative opinions about my Uni, which I all along kind of knew was based mainly on overrated hype, so now I got to ask for ' reasons' "
Reasons huh ? no problem
Very overrated :
Warwick - It hired a bunch of good Math and Econ tutors and marketed itself well, so what ? that does not make it inherently " good".
How long can it last if the rep is based solely on that. What's to stop Brunel from doing the same thing and then are we supposed to believe Brunel would be top 10?
Don't think so..
Durham - The problem with this lot is that they postulate as some sort of 3rd Oxbridge which is a load of c**p and a sham since they are nowhere even near the 3rd oldest nor the 3rd best.
On age alone Edin and St A whips them by about 250 years ...
Quality better than ICL, UCL , LSE ? yeah right , in your dreams.
So that brings us to their real level - vs the Bristols and the Southamptons of the world and I would put them at the bottom of this tier.
OK they got a bit of law, history - again why can't this be easily replicated by anyone ?
Nottingham - Again a Charlatan that postulates as an "ancient". Can someone tell them they got their royal charter in 1948 so don't BS with the 18xx.
Their " repute " relies on bullying foreigners in their various " global campuses" to vote for them.
Nottingham in Ningbo ???
What ? like a global brand like NYU in London ?
HAHAHAHAHA.
Gimme a F'g break, Notts is not even a 400,000 city, NY has 8 million, you fool get that through your thick heads.
LSE - Only 100 years old or so, limited service no sciences or real arts and the tail end of its S Sciences are let's face it ; c**p, stuff like geography.
Yeah geo in a 2 block Uni trapped in an urban jungle. HAHA.
Supposedly the leader in Finance and Econs. Well my view is that they dress up Maths as Econ/ Finance and it has little practical application to the real world of finance.
No real expertise therefore fluff it up with lots of non applied Math, i know I have worked in finance in Singapore for a big 4 UK bank. It's a lot more physical than most academic goons will know.
Also must be compared globally since this is how they tout themselves.
Vs NYU, Vs Chicago, Harvard, Stanford.
No I don't think soo.
I would even take UCLA over LSE anyday.
Newcastle - non descript with nothing unique to offer in a run down part of UK. But the natives are nice not their fault.
Somewhat overrated: Only going to do selected few.
Oxford/ Cambridge - This applies more to Ox then bridge.
Best for old old world subjects - Law, Medicine, Sciences, Latin, Classics, History, English, Economics etc You get the picture.
2 problems; the world is moving on fast and they must compete globally.
What about finance, accounting, Oriental studies? Hispanic studies? Arabic studies? Advanced IT, robotics, engineering ?
Both Oxford and Cambridge don't even have an accounting degree! wtf ?
And both only started their business schools a few years back !
What about IT? Can it match MIT and Stanford with their super duper main frames ?
Robotics? compared with Tokyo U ?
I say sayonara gaijin !
Top in UK yeah sure but top 5 in the world today - no I think that would be hard.
Many names would pose a very strong challenge.
UCL - Top 5 UK definitely but would struggle in my view for top 20-30 world.
Strengths we know.
Weaknesses - accounting, finance, engineering, politics, IR, SEES = weak, no oriental studies.
Compare to other world city U's: according to THES - really better NYU? Chicago ? UCLA ? Zurich ? Tokyo? Beijing ?
Questionable me thinks
Underrated:
Sussex, UEA, Notts Trent
Why ? I save that for the next post.
Watch Oxbridge and UCL scramble to put up a BSc accounting for 2012.
Ha! I am their program director did you all not know ?