Turn on thread page Beta

[From a White person] Do Whites DESERVE to be bred out? watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kerily)
    You can't know that that's actually an inherent fact about Chinese people's brains though, and not socialisation and cultural values. (Also, 'most Chinese people I know' isn't the largest or most scientifically conducted of samples )

    No need to be sarcastic, also.
    I'm not interested in this discussion. Instead of faffing around, I will ask you bluntly. I believe that, currently, Whites tend to be more materialistic than other races, e.g. Pakistanis/Chinese. Do you disagree?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by No Future)
    I still don't understand what you're asking, are you just referring to Pakistanis?
    Pakistanis are an example of a certain group of people who (I believe) generally have values such as wanting many children, wanting to stay healthy and stay away from drugs etc, and value family life.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Selkarn)
    I'm not interested in this discussion. Instead of faffing around, I will ask you bluntly. I believe that, currently, Whites tend to be more materialistic than other races, e.g. Pakistanis/Chinese. Do you disagree?
    I don't think it's linked to race, but to culture and where you live. Any race could be materialistic if they were living in a very materialistic society. I don't think it's related to the colour of your skin.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    You sound retarded.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    How can a race deserve anything?



    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    [From a Jew] Did Jews deserve the holocaust?
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Oh just **** off, **** right off. Deserve to be bred out? Are you kidding me? **** you.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by HighestKungFu)
    Oh just **** off, **** right off. Deserve to be bred out? Are you kidding me? **** you.
    You mad?
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Selkarn)
    Foreword: By White, I mean the current definition of white. White skinned people will always tend to exist in places where they already exist, as due to natural selection, darker skinned people such as negroes get vitamin D deficiencies from a lack of sunlight (white skin is also spreading around the world, e.g. I'm 100% White Northern European but many Iranians I see have lighter skin than me o.O). Source:

    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...840985,00.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skin_color
    http://www.theroot.com/views/why-bla...more-vitamin-d
    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/li.../l_073_04.html


    Anyway, to the crux of the thread. The way I see it - GENERALISATIONS ALERT - Whites are materialistic, unintelligent, out of touch with what really matters, and shallow. In contrast, there are e.g. Pakistani Muslims who value health, family, aren't materialistic, study hard, etc. So purely from a utilitarian point, surely Muslims should become the majority?

    Edit: I had originally written "Pakistani Muslims" but forgot to replace it.

    Edit Edit: When I say "should", people seem to think I'm taking a moral stance. I mean "should" in the sense of natural selection. I.e. one race procreates a lot, another race is materialistic and has low birth rates.
    You deserve to be bred out.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by No Future)
    I don't think it's linked to race, but to culture and where you live. Any race could be materialistic if they were living in a very materialistic society. I don't think it's related to the colour of your skin.
    I will repeat what I said. I did not ask you what it is linked to. I asked you whether you agreed with the statement I propositioned.

    I believe that, currently, Whites tend to be more materialistic than other races, e.g. Pakistanis/Chinese. Do you disagree?
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Arcanine)
    You mad?
    Lol yeah, I'm mad. It's pretty obvious right?
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Who cares is white people are bred out? Their descendants will still be human, who cares if they have a slightly different skin tone?
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Selkarn)
    I will repeat what I said. I did not ask you what it is linked to. I asked you whether you agreed with the statement I propositioned.

    I believe that, currently, Whites tend to be more materialistic than other races, e.g. Pakistanis/Chinese. Do you disagree?
    Let me repeat my reply: no I don't think white people are generally more materialistic than other races.

    I've come across materialistic people of various races.

    I don't think there is a link between race and being materialistic.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    What does it mean to be bred out anyway? If I had children with someone of another race, and they had children with someone of another race, etc. Those descendents are still just as much my descendents as they would be if I had children with a white woman. Surely if all these different races mix with each other, won't they all be bred out? People will be a mix of all of them.

    I don't think white people "deserve" to be bred out because I don't see why it's particularly a bad thing. If it happens, so be it. If it doesn't happen, so be it. I don't think it matters either way.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by navarre)
    Who cares is white people are bred out? Their descendants will still be human, who cares if they have a slightly different skin tone?
    Agree and if any white people are worried, there's a very simple solution: have sex with as many white people as possible.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by No Future)
    Let me repeat my reply: no I don't think white people are generally more materialistic than other races.
    Ok. Then you disagree with a fundamental assumption I am making, which cannot really be rectified.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kerily)
    You can't know that that's actually an inherent fact about Chinese people's brains though, and not socialisation and cultural values. (Also, 'most Chinese people I know' isn't the largest or most scientifically conducted of samples )

    No need to be sarcastic, also.
    Different people have varying abilities and potential that was acquired in their DNA. You don't refute that some people are born with more physical/muscular potential do you? or how about height? even races (especially races) have those characteristics in their DNA. If I say "most Chinese are shorter than Germans, not their fault it's only their blood" you wouldn't get self-righteous would you?
    And Japanese/South-Koreans, sure it's a social upbringing as well but how do you explain this when they leave their country, and continue to be obssessed with their work with an amazing IQ? I was told nobody begs in Japan, they all work. Sounds right, I've never seen a Jap beggar.
    Don't tell me it's only their upbringing.

    notice I said "potential in DNA" all the time. e.g. if you were born with amazing physical/muscle potential, but didn't work out for some reason, you'd be weaker than a naturally skinny guy working out all his life. But in general, your type would be stronger.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Selkarn)
    Foreword: By White, I mean the current definition of white. White skinned people will always tend to exist in places where they already exist, as due to natural selection, darker skinned people such as negroes get vitamin D deficiencies from a lack of sunlight (white skin is also spreading around the world, e.g. I'm 100% White Northern European but many Iranians I see have lighter skin than me o.O). Source:

    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...840985,00.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skin_color
    http://www.theroot.com/views/why-bla...more-vitamin-d
    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/li.../l_073_04.html


    Anyway, to the crux of the thread. The way I see it - GENERALISATIONS ALERT - Whites are materialistic, unintelligent, out of touch with what really matters, and shallow. In contrast, there are e.g. Pakistani Muslims who value health, family, aren't materialistic, study hard, etc. So purely from a utilitarian point, surely Muslims should become the majority?

    Edit: I had originally written "Pakistani Muslims" but forgot to replace it.

    Edit Edit: When I say "should", people seem to think I'm taking a moral stance. I mean "should" in the sense of natural selection. I.e. one race procreates a lot, another race is materialistic and has low birth rates.
    How would you like to join the TSR British National Party?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Psyk)
    What does it mean to be bred out anyway? If I had children with someone of another race, and they had children with someone of another race, etc. Those descendents are still just as much my descendents as they would be if I had children with a white woman. Surely if all these different races mix with each other, won't they all be bred out? People will be a mix of all of them.

    I don't think white people "deserve" to be bred out because I don't see why it's particularly a bad thing. If it happens, so be it. If it doesn't happen, so be it. I don't think it matters either way.
    Good points, but you are getting descendants confused with race. If every White person had children with only non-White people, then when all those original White people died, the White race would be eliminated, agreed?
 
 
 
The home of Results and Clearing

2,396

people online now

1,567,000

students helped last year
Poll
A-level students - how do you feel about your results?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.