The Student Room Group

Like younger girls.

Scroll to see replies

Reply 20

You're the bear.
(edited 12 years ago)
I wonder if the age of consent was 14 over here (like it is in say, Germany) whether everyone would be calling you a paedo?
I must admit it does sound quite sick, seen as these girls are illegal and you are an adult male.
Yeah, personally it does sit uncomfortably as they aren't women physically or psychologically and are legally little girls. I guess as long as you don't act on it, who can do anything about it.
Reply 23
I don't think it's weird to look as long as they have some sexual characteristics - so they're not flat-chested and you're not thinking of them as a child. It's weird to act on it though, because of the law.
Reply 24
it's a little bit strange because they're at a totally different stage in life to you. you'll be deciding on uni and they'll be choosing what gcses to take.you'll be going out clubbing and they'll just be getting their first bit of freedom from their parents. you'll have nothing in common.
:rofl: My ex is 18 and he is going out with a 15-year-old. Is that weird too?
As evidenced by all the people calling 'paedo', socialisation is a powerful thing. My advice? Move to Spain. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe#Spain
Well I'm sixteen and I ****ed a twenty year old and I bet no one Would think that's weird, cos I'm legal.
Reply 28
Especially for this thread:



HOW ABOUT....

Spoiler



That may be the best one for you OP if you carry on at this rate :fyi:
I'm 18, and although I'm not attracted to 14 year olds myself, I don't see any problem with it; it's only 4 years ffs! Just because we pass the magical age of 18 where we're supposed to magically turn into men all of a sudden, it doesn't change the reality that we are little different to 16/17 year olds, of whom seeing a 14 year old girl would be considered 'normal'.
Original post by Wilberforce
I'm 18, and although I'm not attracted to 14 year olds myself, I don't see any problem with it; it's only 4 years ffs! Just because we pass the magical age of 18 where we're supposed to magically turn into men all of a sudden, it doesn't change the reality that we are little different to 16/17 year olds, of whom seeing a 14 year old girl would be considered 'normal'.


Ehhhh, the fact that a 14 year old female has not yet undergone significant change through puberty, whilst an 18 year old male has, makes it a bit of a no-no.

A 14 year old female is closer to being a child than to being a woman, whilst an 18 year old man is exactly that, a man! An adult! Shouldn't be fiddling around with children.
Original post by MathematicsKiller
Ehhhh, the fact that a 14 year old female has not yet undergone significant change through puberty, whilst an 18 year old male has, makes it a bit of a no-no.

A 14 year old female is closer to being a child than to being a woman, whilst an 18 year old man is exactly that, a man! An adult! Shouldn't be fiddling around with children.


Not really, seeing as girls mature faster than boys. Most 14 year old girls these days look more like they're 16/17 anyway.
Original post by Wilberforce
Not really, seeing as girls mature faster than boys. Most 14 year old girls these days look more like they're 16/17 anyway.


You can still notice a young girl despite heels/make up, etc.

And 14 is too young.
Couples only tend to go for the 4+ age difference if they're 25+. This is because it is awkward.
Original post by UnknwnEntity
? •?•?? Oh hai whats goin on in dis thread


Careful mate, you're mightily close to a banning :wink:
Oh hai whats goin on in dis thread
There is a biological tendency (and thus, evolutionary advantage) for men to be attracted to younger women, and younger women to be attracted to older men. Of course, it's one thing to think about something, and another to act on those impulses. If we all just acted on impulse, well, society would collapse. Ever felt so mad you just wanted to kill someone?

I won't comment on the ethics here; just thought I'd throw in some evolutionary theory!
Original post by MathematicsKiller
Ehhhh, the fact that a 14 year old female has not yet undergone significant change through puberty, whilst an 18 year old male has, makes it a bit of a no-no.

A 14 year old female is closer to being a child than to being a woman, whilst an 18 year old man is exactly that, a man! An adult! Shouldn't be fiddling around with children.


A 14 year old will not have undergone significant change through puberty? You do know that girls can start to have periods from the age of 9, which is officially when one starts puberty?
Reply 37
Original post by *Dreaming*
Well it's illegal to do anything with them so yeah, it's weird. Can't you get a girl your own age?


Illegal =/= weird, but I do think that this is a bit :K: :curious: :erm: in my opinion.
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by thecookiemonster
A 14 year old will not have undergone significant change through puberty? You do know that girls can start to have periods from the age of 9, which is officially when one starts puberty?


I can't believe this. It sounds like you've just come out of a pre-GCSE science classroom, writing down any rubbish you've learnt in school without thinking about it properly.

Okay, let me put this in SIMPLE terms for you.

Let's say puberty ends at 18 for girls, and to make it easy, let's say they start at 10.
This means that by 14 they have only gone HALF way through puberty.
Sure, the female might have began to grow breasts, but had not finished developing.

On the other hand, a male who is 18 is CLEARLY a MAN - physically an adult.

Therefore, physical development of 14 yr old female < physical development of male.
And the difference is so great that it seems fairly iffy.
Reply 39
I like girls that are 14, I'm 14 but you're 18...

Quick Reply

Latest