Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta

48÷2(9+3) = ? watch

  • View Poll Results: 48/2(9+3)
    2
    117
    52.47%
    288
    106
    47.53%

    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Someone add a poll to this, just curious how many go with 288 or 2


    288 represent !
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Best Superlative)
    You've rearranged the problem!

    The way you've written it is an inferred action, and that's where I think the majority of the incorrect calculations are coming from. Don't alter it, just take it how it is.
    Or maybe the questioner is an idiot who should've made it clearer? Lets just come to the conclusion that some people will obtain an answer of 2 or 288 but the questioner should've displayed the question with more clarity. I still would take the answer to be 2.
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by py0alb)
    48/2(9+3) = poor notation.
    Meaningless, in fact.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    The reason so many people mistakenly arrive at 2 as the answer is that they are ascribing a false affinity or higher priority to the operation between the 2 and the "(9+3)" and interpreting it as having to be calculated before the division. In fact, between the 2 and the parenthesis is merely an implied multiplication, so the expression is actually:

    48/2(9+3) = 48/2x(9+3) = 48/2x12 = 288.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DanielleT192)
    Or maybe the questioner is an idiot who should've made it clearer? Lets just come to the conclusion that some people will obtain an answer os 2 or 288 but the questioner should've displayed the question with more clarity. I still would take the answer to be 2.
    The notation is very poor, and it's obviously designed to confuse people by making them process it in an incorrect way. Some people will naturally group the 2(9+3) into one problem unit (whereas the 2 and the (9+3) are units by themselves) and perform that calculation before dividing 48 by the result.

    But as a series of operations, I would* say that it's pretty much inarguable (at least in CompSci) that it would process each of the steps in a linear progression according to BIDMAS, i.e. 48 divided by 2 multiplied by 12 = 288.


    *I say "would", but the fact that we're arguing about it would seem to suggest that it's up for debate.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DanielleT192)
    Or maybe the questioner is an idiot who should've made it clearer? Lets just come to the conclusion that some people will obtain an answer of 2 or 288 but the questioner should've displayed the question with more clarity. I still would take the answer to be 2.
    Agree
    • PS Helper
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    PS Helper
    I thought 2.

    I then checked my calculator.

    It thinks 2 too.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ice_Queen)
    I thought 2.

    I then checked my calculator.

    It thinks 2 too.

    I'm please to discover that my calculator, a Sharp EL-531H, works correctly and gives 288. Lots of calculators just do simple left to right, which is totally wrong.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Hedgeman49)
    The answer is 288.

    Your brain thinks that the answer is 2 because 48/2(3+9) makes the 2(3+9) look "grouped together" and hence bracketed even though it is no more bracketed than the rest of the expression. (I admit that my instant reaction to this was 2 and only when I thought about it further did I realise I was wrong).
    You've got/ going to have a masters in maths so im guessing you would know and so 288 would probably be right, although ive always thought ud have to use BIDMAS for these types of calculations, and according to that, the answer is 2.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    It's 288, by BIDMAS. :yep:

    This is why it's usually better to go crazy with brackets in public, just to make sure you're not misinterpreted.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by booooom)
    ive always thought ud have to use BIDMAS for these types of calculations, and according to that, the answer is 2.
    Read my post 127, and I'll bet you'll find you haven't applied it correctly.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    BIDMAS is just a useful shorthand for young kids to learn. The actual orders of precedence look like this:

    terms inside brackets
    exponents and roots
    multiplication and division
    addition and subtraction

    There is no preference between multiplication and division, but you parse then left to right.

    Thus it is, indeed 288, but strict application of BIDMAS alone doesnt get you there, you also need to know the left-to-right rule.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by HedonisticMe)
    you do know they're two entirely different equations?

    on the second you'd times by 1/2(9 + 3)...
    I know they're different, that's why I wrote them out. It's what the OP asked, and the two different ways it can be interpreted.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    This is really embarassing given that it's so simple, and I'm 20, but I had to do it twice ha ha. I agree it's 2 now though
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by HistoryRepeating)
    Are you, and every other idiot in this thread claiming anything other than 2, trolling?

    Seriously, are you all really that stupid?

    Basic rule of maths that you work from right to left when dealing with operations of the same priority: so it goes brackets first (highest priority) then right to left on the multiplication and division.

    I am convinced most people claiming 288 are trolling.
    Certainly not! You have to expand the operators first, before executing them - as I demonstrated - then go from left to right. 48 / 2 x 12 is obviously 288, isn't it?
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Gemma :)!)
    I agree it's 2 now though
    Oh dear!
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Best Superlative)
    The notation is very poor, and it's obviously designed to confuse people by making them process it in an incorrect way. Some people will naturally group the 2(9+3) into one problem unit (whereas the 2 and the (9+3) are units by themselves) and perform that calculation before dividing 48 by the result.

    But as a series of operations, I would* say that it's pretty much inarguable (at least in CompSci) that it would process each of the steps in a linear progression according to BIDMAS, i.e. 48 divided by 2 multiplied by 12 = 288.


    *I say "would", but the fact that we're arguing about it would seem to suggest that it's up for debate.
    But you're basically saying that 48 divided by 2(12) should be treated as 48 divided by 2 and then multiplied by 12 to obtain the answer of 288 simply because of the arrangement of BODMAS. Multiplication and division are treated equally, as does subtraction and addition and I'm guessing the only reason that BODMAS is spelt that way is to make it easier for people to remember the rule that brackets takes priority in terms of arithmetic equations.

    Really, it's the way the question is set out and that is the most important thing. The questioner doesn't expect you to use a calculator to work out this question or have a "computing minded" mode, but use initiative to what you could see. So I still stick to 2, even though it's obvious the question isn't presented well.

    Edit: Why the neg reps ? It's true.
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    288 is the answer. BDMAS...

    Plus my intelligent fx-991ES also gives the answer as 288.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rob da Mop)
    If it wanted to be 288 shouldn't the first part be in brackets as well as the second?
    This, surely?
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Obviously the difference between getting 2 and 288 lies in whether you're multiplying 2 with 9+3 first, or if you're dividing 48 with 2.

    With BIDMAS it's assumed you divide, although at school I was told that both division and multiplication are interchangeable; that is, it doesn't matter which one comes first (the same apparently goes for +/-).

    So... if my teachers weren't lying... the answer is 2 and 288. :p:
 
 
 
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: April 9, 2011
Poll
Do you like carrot cake?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.