You are Here: Home >< Maths

# help differentiating a quotient watch

1. Question:

given

show that

__________________________-

I can't seem to get there. Cancelling the 4's and using the quotient rule gives me

which doesn't look much like what they've got
2. I get the same answer as you, what do they have?
3. (Original post by jameswhughes)
I get the same answer as you, what do they have?
they have what I posted. "show that"
4. (Original post by Plato's Trousers)
they have what I posted. "show that"
oops, didn't see that. i can't get it either :/
5. They've made a mistake I think, try plugging in values
6. try using the product rule instead.
7. I haven't used the qoutient rule in a few weeks, i guess il have to go back to it and recap.
8. Ewan has already sorted this one.
9. Use implicit differentiation, works for me
10. (Original post by Scottishsiv)
Use implicit differentiation, works for me
11. (Original post by Scottishsiv)
Use implicit differentiation, works for me
There is nothing implicit to differentiate here - everything's explicit unless you're trying to turn something that is explicit into an implicit form, but that almost never helps.
12. (Original post by Farhan.Hanif93)
There is nothing implicit to differentiate here, everything's explicit.
I think he meant you could multiply both sides by the denominator.

However substitution shows the answer Plato has got (which is correct) is not equivalent to the supposedly simplified one anyway.
13. Well first turn it into:

yln(x+3) = ln(x-3)

then differentiate both sides using implicit differentiation

the you get dy/dx ln(x+3) = 1/(x-3) - y/(x+3)

then sub in y = ln(x-3) / ln (x+3)

I think that works, haven't worked further than this though. apologies for the layout.
14. (Original post by Mr M)
I think he meant you could multiply both sides by the denominator.

However substitution shows the answer Plato has got (which is correct) is not equivalent to the supposedly simplified one anyway.
Yep, edited my post just as you were typing.
15. (Original post by Scottishsiv)
Well first turn it into:

yln(x+3) = ln(x-3)

then differentiate both sides using implicit differentiation

the you get dy/dx ln(x+3) = 1/(x-3) - y/(x+3)

then sub in y = ln(x-3) / ln (x+3)

I think that works, haven't worked further than this though. apologies for the layout.
From which it follows that you get what Plato got, which is the right answer but it doesn't match the given answer.
16. thanks everyone! Reassuring

### Related university courses

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: April 10, 2011
Today on TSR

### Top unis in Clearing

Tons of places at all these high-ranking unis

### Why do women like men in suits?

• create my feed
• edit my feed
Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams