Turn on thread page Beta
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jace Falco)
    You're a persistent troll, but not a very funny one.
    He is trying to take you for a ride on the troller coaster

    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Teaddict)
    He is trying to take you for a ride on the troller coaster

    :zomg:
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tehFrance)
    The nuclear weapons where not the problem, the problem was no free enterprise and everything state run, this lowered their GDP vastly compared to America that had a free market where people increased their own wealth as well as the US Governments coffers.

    The Free Market is the way forward not socialist nationalisation
    if everyone worked to make the state better after learning that the better the state will be, the better they will be, then it would have worked


    PS: I didnt say dont allow free enterprise, i meant all natural raw materials should be nationalised. ALSO, I WOULDEN'T ALLOW companies to be formed as everyone should be liable for their actions
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ham and Cheese)
    I kissed her once.

    Either way Teaddict is working on the black and white view that it was illegal so it would have been illegal with the 15/16 year old as it was with the 17/14 year old? Makes no sense.
    Doesn't matter. The fact that an 18 year old is dating a 13 year old is still ****ing creepy.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Magnum Opus)
    For the first time in the history of The Student Room, we are also collecting self nominations. If you feel you could fulfil the role described and meet the above criteria, you can also nominate yourself by posting in the Moderator Nominations forum and answering these following questions (around 100 words is enough):
    Pretty sure it's not the first time
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pESOSI2hTA

    :teehee:
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by PendulumBoB)
    Google is based in America and that's the American spelling-duh

    Impertenence is the English spelling

    Clearly you're an impertenonce
    Contrariwise, if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.



    And why? Because OED says you're wrong.
    Offline

    15
    (Original post by wasteman)
    if everyone worked to make the state better after learning that the better the state will be, the better they will be, then it would have worked
    They had a guaranteed rate of pay, no matter how they worked they would of been paid so I highly doubt that would help.

    As far as I am concerned no nationalised company will ever provide the same standard of service that a private company would.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tehFrance)
    They had a guaranteed rate of pay, no matter how they worked they would of been paid so I highly doubt that would help.

    As far as I am concerned no nationalised company will ever provide the same standard of service that a private company would.
    but what if its government owned but indipendent- wouldn't that create competition between diffrent branches of that industry if the workers had a kind of "company spirit" ( which wouldn't be hard to achieve in my view)
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Just checking out Know your Meme and rediscovered boxxy:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsFebKreNE0

    Am I the only one thinking she is actually quite attractive?
    Offline

    15
    (Original post by Ham and Cheese)
    Try South West Trains! Greedy companies who only care about money and raping you at the ticket machine. Public transport should be in the public sector; look how well the buses and the Oyster card system works in London
    You do know what a huge subsidy Transport for London has and what a totally different kettle of fish London's transport system is to the system SWT operates.

    You don't want to get into an argument with me about trains. You'll lose.
    • Wiki Support Team
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Wiki Support Team
    (Original post by cambo211)
    Pretty sure it's not the first time
    it's the first time here :ninja:
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    I'll do it. :loony:
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tehFrance)
    You have clearly never been on SNCF trains :pierre:
    I was under the impression that SNCF was state-owned :o:
    Offline

    15
    (Original post by Student2806)
    I was under the impression that SNCF was state-owned :o:
    It is but I was originally talking about government owned companies in response to another members post about nationalisation and H&C brought trains up so :lol:
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tehFrance)
    It is but I was originally talking about government owned companies in response to another members post about nationalisation and H&C brought trains up so :lol:
    Oh I see. I'm not really paying enough attention :tongue:
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Someone on here must watch The Shadow Line... :puppyeyes:

    If you don't, start. Best piece of British TV for as long as I can remember.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Student2806)
    Someone on here must watch The Shadow Line... :puppyeyes:

    If you don't, start. Best piece of British TV for as long as I can remember.
    Watching the first episode on iPlayer now.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by wasteman)
    but what if its government owned but indipendent- wouldn't that create competition between diffrent branches of that industry if the workers had a kind of "company spirit" ( which wouldn't be hard to achieve in my view)
    I used to agree with your line of thought(and possibley still do) but surely those who run the government would let things slip as they have no privatised "metre rule" with which to measure their efficiency
 
 
 
Poll
Which accompaniment is best?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.