Turn on thread page Beta
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by paddy__power)
    In general you - she's annoying, although at one point you do state that we WOULD be able to enter into a free trade agreement if I remember correctly.
    Yes I did notice that myself actually; I think the first post contained "would" thereafter I ensured I used if.
    • PS Reviewer
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    PS Reviewer
    (Original post by Wednesday Bass)
    Out of interest, as the previous leader of UKIP, where do you now stand on UK independence?
    I'm still not a fan of the EU as it is but am not convinced that leaving it is necessarily the best way to approach it. I am generally undecided/evaluating.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Haha now she is generalising about all students... oh dear.
    • PS Reviewer
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    PS Reviewer
    (Original post by Teaddict)
    Yes I did notice that myself actually; I think the first post contained "would" thereafter I ensured I used if.
    Yea, I would take your side in that debate in terms of practice - not to say that her substance was necessarily poor but she should have at least provided more of the theory if not 'proof'.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by paddy__power)
    Yea, I would take your side in that debate in terms of practice - not to say that her substance was necessarily poor but she should have at least provided more of the theory if not 'proof'.
    Indeed. I don't know why she won't provide the proof, on other threads where we have spoken about the European Union I have stated clearly that I want the evidence because I am genuinely interested in reading it.
    • PS Reviewer
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    PS Reviewer
    (Original post by Teaddict)
    Indeed. I don't know why she won't provide the proof, on other threads where we have spoken about the European Union I have stated clearly that I want the evidence because I am genuinely interested in reading it.
    You could search for it?
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by paddy__power)
    You could search for it?
    I could but there are a couple of reasons why I won't.

    1. I don't believe it is at all accurate or truthful
    2. I didn't make the claim she did
    3. I have better things to do

    • PS Reviewer
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    PS Reviewer
    (Original post by Teaddict)
    I could but there are a couple of reasons why I won't.

    1. I don't believe it is at all accurate or truthful
    2. I didn't make the claim she did
    3. I have better things to do

    1. How do you know without looking?
    2. Yes but your motivation is to see it and not to prove a claim, so you can state the above with more certainty.
    3. No you don't

    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by paddy__power)
    1. How do you know without looking?
    2. Yes but your motivation is to see it and not to prove a claim, so you can state the above with more certainty.
    3. No you don't
    I don't know but I can't be arsed to look either.

    I do have better things to do... games, laying in the sun, playing with the dog, eating a carrot... plenty of things to do.
    • PS Reviewer
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    PS Reviewer
    (Original post by Teaddict)
    I don't know but I can't be arsed to look either.

    I do have better things to do... games, laying in the sun, playing with the dog, eating a carrot... plenty of things to do.
    :lol:

    Fair enough.

    I want beer.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    This is great:

    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Teaddict)
    This is great:

    Always a laugh.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Thunder and Jazz)
    Always a laugh.
    I must admit as much as I support the Conservatives, they are pretty good for comedy

    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    HoC Update is likely to be slightly earlier today - around 7:30pm.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Metrobeans)
    HoC Update is likely to be slightly earlier today - around 7:30pm.
    Pub?
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Thunder and Jazz)
    Pub?
    Sounds like a plan.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Thunder and Jazz)
    Pub?
    Yessir!
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    I am really tempted to post the comments you guys made about Lois on that thread. She really annoys me.

    I think this covers it:
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Teaddict)
    I am really tempted to post the comments you guys made about Lois on that thread. She really annoys me.

    I think this covers it:
    Isn't that an XKCD comic?
 
 
 
Poll
How are you feeling in the run-up to Results Day 2018?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.