The Student Room Group

OCR B Salters - F335 Exam - 15 June 2011

Scroll to see replies

Reply 260
Original post by pearlover
thank you :smile:
do you get the Kw value for water? can you explain about that abit please?


Ok.

Kw is how you work out the pH of strong bases.

You will be given Kw which I think off the top of my head is 1x10^-14, but that might be wrong and it doesn't matter anyways because they tell you it!

So the basic equation is.

Kw = (H+)(OH-)

They will give you the concentration of the alkali, so for example a question might look like this:

Work out the pH of a 0.1mol dm-3 NaOH solution.

Kw = 1x10^-14.

Step 1: You assume NaOH is fully dissociated so slot the concentration of the alkali in for OH- and you know what Kw is.

1x10^-14 = (H+)x(0.1)

Step 2: Rearrange.

(1x10^-14)/0.1 = H+

Answer = 1x10^-13

Step 3: -log(1x10^-13) to work out pH.

pH = 13


Sorry if that is a bit patronising.
Reply 261
Original post by AGM
Ok.

Kw is how you work out the pH of strong bases.

You will be given Kw which I think off the top of my head is 1x10^-14, but that might be wrong and it doesn't matter anyways because they tell you it!

So the basic equation is.

Kw = (H+)(OH-)

They will give you the concentration of the alkali, so for example a question might look like this:

Work out the pH of a 0.1mol dm-3 NaOH solution.

Kw = 1x10^-14.

Step 1: You assume NaOH is fully dissociated so slot the concentration of the alkali in for OH- and you know what Kw is.

1x10^-14 = (H+)x(0.1)

Step 2: Rearrange.

(1x10^-14)/0.1 = H+

Answer = 1x10^-13

Step 3: -log(1x10^-13) to work out pH.

pH = 13


Sorry if that is a bit patronising.


oooh thats not patronising at all it makes soo much sense nw! thank youu so much :smile:
Reply 262
Original post by JackWoot
-log([H+]) = 7.4

[H+]=107.4[H+] ^ {-} = 10 ^ {7.4}

[H+]=1/(107.4)[H+] = 1 / (10 ^ {7.4})

[H+] = 3.98 x 10^8


just a quick question again.
in the mark scheme it says 10^-8 not 10^8
ermm how does that work...
thank you for the help :smile:
Original post by prakruti
just a quick question again.
in the mark scheme it says 10^-8 not 10^8
ermm how does that work...
thank you for the help :smile:


sorry I missed off the negative!
Reply 264
Original post by prakruti
just a quick question again.
in the mark scheme it says 10^-8 not 10^8
ermm how does that work...
thank you for the help :smile:


Try it like so:

-log[H+] = 7.4
log[H+] = -7.4
10^log[H+] = 10^-7.4
[H+] = 10^-7.4
[H+] = 3.98 x 10-8
Reply 265
if delta S solution is positive then it can still dissolve in solution provided that entropy is in it's favour. in the exam how would we know that entropy is in it's favour, is it becuase delta S system is positive?

also; if in the exam they show an equation with same number of moles on both sides of the equation and ask what the effect of increasing the pressure would be, is the answer simply "no change"?
Reply 266
Original post by pav
if delta S solution is positive then it can still dissolve in solution provided that entropy is in it's favour. in the exam how would we know that entropy is in it's favour, is it becuase delta S system is positive?

also; if in the exam they show an equation with same number of moles on both sides of the equation and ask what the effect of increasing the pressure would be, is the answer simply "no change"?


Overall entropy is system + surroundings, so I guess system could be as positive as it wants to be, but if surroundings is even more negative the reaction will not occur spontaneously. So I think it would be delta S total?

If the number of moles of gas are the same then the change would be small, I doubt they'd give us a question like that. However, if they did I suppose you would have to start looking at the size of the molecules?
Reply 267
Original post by zangyray
Try it like so:

-log[H+] = 7.4
log[H+] = -7.4
10^log[H+] = 10^-7.4
[H+] = 10^-7.4
[H+] = 3.98 x 10-8


I get that now. thankss :smile:
Reply 268
i was feeling okay about it, not too worried as i am about my others, but then i went into college to do arevision session and now panicking :frown:
Reply 269
Do you guys time yourself when doing the past papers?
Reply 270
This is going to sound reaaally stupid but how do you work out how many hydrogens there are in cyclic hydrocarbons that are stuck together- for some reason I always get it wrong and it's always like the first mark so probably the easiest question on the paper :/
Reply 271
IM feeling okay for this exam. Done most of the past papers and it seems like the markschemes have a trend in answers so its best to stick with them.
Reply 272
What are the conventions for labelling an energy level diagram there were some in the Jan 11 paper.

Is the y axis labelled energy or enthapy, or does it not matter?

And do you label each energy level, energy level 1, 2, 3 etc.?
Reply 273
Original post by Boompw
What are the conventions for labelling an energy level diagram there were some in the Jan 11 paper.

Is the y axis labelled energy or enthapy, or does it not matter?

And do you label each energy level, energy level 1, 2, 3 etc.?


Its enthalpy I think /\E.
and no you dont have to label each level.
Reply 274
Original post by *Rainbow*
This is going to sound reaaally stupid but how do you work out how many hydrogens there are in cyclic hydrocarbons that are stuck together- for some reason I always get it wrong and it's always like the first mark so probably the easiest question on the paper :/


If you mean the benzene molecules then it should be conjugated. For each carbon on the structure look for how many bonds it has attached to it. If it has 4 then it will have no hydrogens and if it has 3 bonds then 1 hydrogen atom.
Reply 275
Original post by JamesPen
IM feeling okay for this exam. Done most of the past papers and it seems like the markschemes have a trend in answers so its best to stick with them.


So you reckon at this stage it's good to keep doing papers and in effect 'learn' from the mark schemes?

Which are the papers of the same syllabus? Jan 2011, June 2010 and was there a Jan 2010?
Reply 276
Original post by Boompw
What are the conventions for labelling an energy level diagram there were some in the Jan 11 paper.

Is the y axis labelled energy or enthapy, or does it not matter?

And do you label each energy level, energy level 1, 2, 3 etc.?


For each energy level i usually put n=1, n=2, n=3 and the further they get up the closer.
Reply 277
I advise Chemguide for anybody who's struggling with NMR. CI doesn't do a god job of explaining it.
Reply 278
Original post by Jamesrb
So you reckon at this stage it's good to keep doing papers and in effect 'learn' from the mark schemes?

Which are the papers of the same syllabus? Jan 2011, June 2010 and was there a Jan 2010?


You need to have basic knowledge for what is needed to be written but you also need to be able to write consicely and look out for sentences and works they are expecting in answers rather than waffling on. :smile:
Reply 279
Original post by JamesPen
For each energy level i usually put n=1, n=2, n=3 and the further they get up the closer.


In that answer what specifically were they looking for? Will you be able to post a picture.. e.g a link from google

thanks :smile:

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending