Turn on thread page Beta

OCR Physics B G495 Field and Particle Pictures June 21st 2011 Exam Thread watch

    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kttt101)
    did anyone put that the difference in speed of the two wavelengths due to the refraction would cause the superposition effect to break down?

    i totally guessed that
    That's kind of what I put. I said that the phase difference would start to become more constant as the refractive index decreases and thu the phasors become more and more out of phase - but I totally guessed.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kttt101)
    did anyone put that the difference in speed of the two wavelengths due to the refraction would cause the superposition effect to break down?

    i totally guessed that
    See my post above, that was what I put . . .
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kttt101)
    it wasnt as bad as i thought it would be actually

    yeah exactly that.. but i ended up dividing the emf by two... took a risk! if it turns out wrong it will only be a mark
    Oh, why did you divide by two, is it because it said average? Hmm... that's a good point.

    Yeah, it went better than a lot of the past papers I have done, I think.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Summerdays)
    Oh, why did you divide by two, is it because it said average? Hmmmm... that's a good point.

    Yeah, it went better than a lot of the past papers I have done, I think.


    yeah i guessed that at the start of rotation it would be cutting virtually no flux and at the end it would cut the max amount of flux which we'd already worked out so i just did half of what i got

    it was a bit random. i was expecting the last couple of questions on part b to be a magnetism one which is good because thats my weakest area
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Unkempt_One)
    See my post above, that was what I put . . .

    ok.. take it from your predicted youre pretty smart so ill take your word for it!:P
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by arianex)
    Mass of U-235 per year:

    Multiply Watts/power given by number of seconds in a year, get total energy used per year.

    Divide total energy by energy released per fission to get no of nuclei that decay.

    Get actual mass of one U-235 nucleus by multiplying 235 by u to get mass in kg

    Multiply no of nuclei by the mass...result?
    Cheers mate shame that i didn't get that
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    do we got a post about the upcoming unit4 ?? or do we just stick with here ?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Summerdays)
    Oh, why did you divide by two, is it because it said average? Hmm... that's a good point.

    Yeah, it went better than a lot of the past papers I have done, I think.
    On the one with the ring, i thought it was an average because of the way the ring was moving. It wasn't spinning it was just sort of falling, so i thought the bottom part of the ring which didn't move much only cut a few lines, whilst the top part covered a larger distance cutting more lines. So i thought the normal calculation could be the average. :confused:
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 5liam5)
    On the one with the ring, i thought it was an average because of the way the ring was moving. It wasn't spinning it was just sort of falling, so i thought the bottom part of the ring which didn't move much only cut a few lines, whilst the top part covered a larger distance cutting more lines. So i thought the normal calculation could be the average. :confused:
    I think it did spin, but it only did 1/4 of a rotation. If it just feel without spinning then the flux lines through the area of the coil would be constant, I think.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    I got 5kg for for the mass or uranium :/ must have put it into my calculator wrong or something
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Summerdays)
    I think it did spin, but it only did 1/4 of a rotation. If it just feel without spinning then the flux lines through the area of the coil would be constant, I think.
    Aah man i didn't quarter it or anything.. Think i get 0.1V or something.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kttt101)
    it wasnt as bad as i thought it would be actually

    yeah exactly that.. but i ended up dividing the emf by two... took a risk! if it turns out wrong it will only be a mark
    I used the normal equation, i thought it would be average because the normal flux linkage/time graph is a curve, but we calculated the straight line gradient between the points and 0... so i guessed that our equation didn't take into account this curve?
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Geekchic17)
    I used the normal equation, i thought it would be average because the normal flux linkage/time graph is a curve, but we calculated the straight line gradient between the points and 0... so i guessed that our equation didn't take into account this curve?
    Yeah that's what I did.

    Geekchick, what did you put for the 800 minima question?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Keckers)
    I got 4.35 people and rounded it up to 5. I hate those questions haha

    I was generally pretty happy with the paper, hopefully it will be the 2nd A for my durham offer
    I did this too
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Summerdays)
    Yeah that's what I did.

    Geekchick, what did you put for the 800 minima question?
    Erm .. The one asking for wavelength?
    2d = phase difference i think of n/2(lambda) but n is odd, so i think thats the same as your 2n+1 lambda version?
    I can't really remember
    I seem to remember i got somehting like 525 nm for a wavelength somewhere down the line ..? it was like 525 accurate so i presumed it was right?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Just spotted this:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-13857911

    Was this our physics paper or a different one? Sorry if it's already been mentioned on here.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    did anyone else get like 4.96 kg for the mass of uranium used??
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by LALP10)
    Just spotted this:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-13857911

    Was this our physics paper or a different one? Sorry if it's already been mentioned on here.
    I think it was OCR A (From what people were saying before)
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Geekchic17)
    Erm .. The one asking for wavelength?
    2d = phase difference i think of n/2(lambda) but n is odd, so i think thats the same as your 2n+1 lambda version?
    I can't really remember
    I seem to remember i got somehting like 525 nm for a wavelength somewhere down the line ..? it was like 525 accurate so i presumed it was right?
    Yeah, I got 525 nm. The difference between the two answers is minimal.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by vit1008)
    did anyone else get like 4.96 kg for the mass of uranium used??
    Think i got 2000kg
 
 
 

University open days

  1. University of Bradford
    University-wide Postgraduate
    Wed, 25 Jul '18
  2. University of Buckingham
    Psychology Taster Tutorial Undergraduate
    Wed, 25 Jul '18
  3. Bournemouth University
    Clearing Campus Visit Undergraduate
    Wed, 1 Aug '18
Poll
How are you feeling in the run-up to Results Day 2018?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.