Turn on thread page Beta

Let's say we deport all the immigrants...what then? watch

    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Dude Where's My Username)
    Then they deport everybody whose bloodline wasn't here 1,000,000 years ago. And they have another street party. All 0 of them
    There was no one here 1,000,000 years ago. Humans did not exist 1,000,000 years ago
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Imperial Darklord)
    Oh look, we got a Japanese bigot here!
    Now that is rare on TSR :eek:

    Don't you have a busy schedule of "gotta catch em all?"

    Still don't change fact that India is a basket case
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Some random guy)
    Don't you know, all asian people are the same race fool, they all look the same to me herp derp!
    High Asian yes , not Indians.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by A Mysterious Lord)
    Let's not get into this trap. The people here of Roman, Saxon, Viking and Norman descent are the result of INVASION, not immigration. There was no such thing as the 'United Kingdom' back then, in fact England itself was nothing like it is today. The thing is that these invasions were people from Northern Europe, whose culture and way of life were very similar to ours - the problem is arising particularly, but not limited to, Islamic immigration.

    The argument typically means anyone who entered the country after 1948, when the British Nationality Act was passed.
    Then surely you should support intergration, not deportation.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    den dur dur mer jerb werd come back curz liked them immIgrants tooked it frum me dur dur dur
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I would be able to get that job in KFC i applied for
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ish90an)
    GDP per capita is higher in the UK. At least get your facts right.
    America's always been a country of immigrants, be it Italians and Eastern Europeans in New York or Hispanics in California. There never has been this massive drive of "alien cultures" that you are so incensed about. Lets face the elephant in the room shall we, its not immigration you are so annoyed about, its race. Your little mind cannot compute the fact that somehow someone with even slightly darker skin could actually do well in the UK. I am willing to bet you aren't so worried about Eastern European immigration.


    yes, you are correct on the first point. the japanese per capita has just recently fallen slightly below below uk. i was going of older data.

    however, quality of life is still a lot better and the overall economy is still a lot stronger.

    UN rates japan as the 11th most developed country in the world. uk 26th.


    as for the rest of your rant, america was always a country of european immigrants up until recently. differnce now, is that america is being flooded with millions of non european immigrants. its not the same situation at all.

    america is not the same country it was 100 years ago either. it does not have the indistrial capicity to absorb the immigrants anymore. plus, like britain, its has followed a suicidal path of multiculturalism which further undermines stability.

    america is finished in its present state. by 2042, white people will be a minority. in the 1960s, they were over 90%. that kind of rapid change cannot just happen without great upheaval.

    the flower of civilisation is passing over to the east. lets hope they keep themselves monoracial and strong.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by humanrights)
    yes, you are correct on the first point. the japanese per capita has just recently fallen slightly below below uk. i was going of older data.

    however, quality of life is still a lot better and the overall economy is still a lot stronger.
    UN rates japan as the 11th most developed country in the world. uk 26th.
    Japan has a debt-to-GDP ratio of 220%, recently fell behind China and is now the world's 3rd largest(by GDP) economy, has been in a recession for almost 20 years and is facing intense competition in manufacturing from the developing world. Hardly the signs of a "strong" economy.

    as for the rest of your rant, america was always a country of european immigrants up until recently. differnce now, is that america is being flooded with millions of non european immigrants. its not the same situation at all.
    Why did I have an idea this was about race and not immigration? Explain why non-European immigration(something that compared to EU immigration is still vastly overrated in Britain anyways) is such a problem but European immigration is not. Also, American immigration problems are to do with Hispanic, not Asian or African immigrants. Go learn a bit about the country you have demonstrated your complete ignorance about.
    america is not the same country it was 100 years ago either. it does not have the indistrial capicity to absorb the immigrants anymore. plus, like britain, its has followed a suicidal path of multiculturalism which further undermines stability.


    america is finished in its present state. by 2042, white people will be a minority. in the 1960s, they were over 90%. that kind of rapid change cannot just happen without great upheaval.
    Evidence? And no, linear extrapolation that does not account for changing social mindsets of 2nd and 3rd generation Muslims or Western education within future generations does not count.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ish90an)
    Japan has a debt-to-GDP ratio of 220%, recently fell behind China and is now the world's 3rd largest(by GDP) economy, has been in a recession for almost 20 years and is facing intense competition in manufacturing from the developing world. Hardly the signs of a "strong" economy.


    Why did I have an idea this was about race and not immigration? Explain why non-European immigration(something that compared to EU immigration is still vastly overrated in Britain anyways) is such a problem but European immigration is not. Also, American immigration problems are to do with Hispanic, not Asian or African immigrants. Go learn a bit about the country you have demonstrated your complete ignorance about.

    Evidence? And no, linear extrapolation that does not account for changing social mindsets of 2nd and 3rd generation Muslims or Western education within future generations does not count.




    i said japan was still far stronger than uk. sure japan is facing competition from developing world. but which developed nation is not?


    but of course its about race you stupid bigot. why do you think race matters to the stability of a country?


    please, show me an historical multi racial society that has not descended into balkanisation or civil war? good luck.

    america and europe are in the beginning stages of that process.

    its hard enough keeping different ethnic groups together and living in peace. harder still ethnic groups with religious differences. britain, europe and the US are trying to juggle different ethnic groups, racial groups and religious groups all at the same time.

    its not going to work and there is no evidence in history to suggest otherwise.


    the future of the west if balkanisation. at best, a middle eastern style set up where rival factions are kept together by dictators. at worst, all out war.

    the rainbow hand holding utopia is not going to happen. the future is with the strong mono racial states of the east. good luck to them.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by humanrights)
    i said japan was still far stronger than uk. sure japan is facing competition from developing world. but which developed nation is not?


    but of course its about race you stupid bigot. why do you think race matters to the stability of a country?


    please, show me an historical multi racial society that has not descended into balkanisation or civil war? good luck.

    america and europe are in the beginning stages of that process.

    its hard enough keeping different ethnic groups together and living in peace. harder still ethnic groups with religious differences. britain, europe and the US are trying to juggle different ethnic groups, racial groups and religious groups all at the same time.

    its not going to work and there is no evidence in history to suggest otherwise.


    the future of the west if balkanisation. at best, a middle eastern style set up where rival factions are kept together by dictators. at worst, all out war.

    the rainbow hand holding utopia is not going to happen. the future is with the strong mono racial states of the east. good luck to them.
    Aye, because China, Brazil and India, 3 of the leading emerging economies today, are pretty mono-racial. Would you like to buy some magic beans while we're at it?:rolleyes:
    America, even at its height, was composed of African Americans, Italians, Hispanics, Jews, Slavics, Native Americans, South Asians, Japanese and Chinese immigrants. It is a country of multiple cultures and races and much of its economic power has been built by immigrants, and not, as you seem to think, by just an Anglo-Saxon elite. Now stop being an embarrassment to the British schooling system and read a book for a change, maybe you will stop making stupid statements about economic might or the role of immigration then.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ish90an)
    Aye, because China, Brazil and India, 3 of the leading emerging economies today, are pretty mono-racial. Would you like to buy some magic beans while we're at it?:rolleyes:
    America, even at its height, was composed of African Americans, Italians, Hispanics, Jews, Slavics, Native Americans, South Asians, Japanese and Chinese immigrants. It is a country of multiple cultures and races and much of its economic power has been built by immigrants, and not, as you seem to think, by just an Anglo-Saxon elite. Now stop being an embarrassment to the British schooling system and read a book for a change, maybe you will stop making stupid statements about economic might or the role of immigration then.


    india is monoracial, but it has 2000 ethnic groups. its not very stable. brazil? hahahaha


    china is going to be the next big power. china is mono racial. it is over 90% han chinese. its a stable society. the han chinese are nationalist. as are most east asians.

    thats the future. when the west was striding globe as a colossus, its was mono racial.

    america at its height was over 90% european american. america is a nation built on british and european foundations, its essentially a european colony. at least, its used to be in its glory days.

    its no co incidence that the decline of the west is happening at the same time as mass immigration and multiculturalism. mass immigration and multiculturalism are symptoms civilisational decline.

    only weak civilisations give up their culture and rely on immigration.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by humanrights)
    india is monoracial, but it has 2000 ethnic groups. its not very stable. brazil? hahahaha
    Actually India has at least 3 major racial divisions(Aryan, Dravidian and Oriental) and plenty of smaller ethnic divisions within. Brazil is one of the leading emerging markets today and is one of the most multi-racial countries on the planet. Stop embarrassing the British school system and resit your Geography A levels.
    china is going to be the next big power. china is mono racial. it is over 90% han chinese. its a stable society. the han chinese are nationalist. as are most east asians.
    Here's a question, if race is so intrinsically linked to economic growth, what on earth was China doing with its proud mono-racial population before the 1980s? Face it, China's economic progress has nothing to do with race and all to do with an artificially weakened currency, an export based economy and economic liberalisation.
    thats the future. when the west was striding globe as a colossus, its was mono racial.
    It really wasn't.
    america at its height was over 90% european american. america is a nation built on british and european foundations, its essentially a european colony. at least, its used to be in its glory days.
    The Chinese, African American and Indian immigrants in America from the 70s, 80s and (the Hispanics in the) 90s beg to differ. Also, European is not a race, you massive fool.
    its no co incidence that the decline of the west is happening at the same time as mass immigration and multiculturalism. mass immigration and multiculturalism are symptoms civilisational decline.
    You mean the crash in 2008 and the ongoing problems have nothing to do with rising debt levels brought about due to Reaganomics that were continued by all successive governments? Only a simpleton like yourself would blame immigration for America and the UK's economic decline.
    only weak civilisations give up their culture and rely on immigration.
    Only wannabe racists think race has anything to do with economic progress and exhibit their own ignorance of economics and history.
    I would advise you to stop posting and displaying your ignorance here, it is clear that you possess a very simplistic understanding of the world and economics and are carrying a massive chip on your shoulder, until you can actually educate yourself your arguments will be just as hollow as they have been proven to be so far.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by therealOG)
    You do realise a very large proportion of immigrants are highly skilled as well as low skilled; lawyers, accountants, doctors, engineers and executives. This list could go on. If all immigrants were magically removed overnight, the UK economy would be decimated due to an unthinkable decline in productivity and output would plummet instantly. Cue the largest and longest depression in human history, with terrible consequences for the rest of the world's economy.
    I understand the role they play. But I think that is hyperbole. Yes we would face harsh consequences, but to say we'll go into a depression, let alone the worst the world has ever seen, well do you not think that's a little dramatic?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    ish90--


    im not being funny here, but how do i reply like you have to certain points? how do i get your individual quotes above my responses?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    China success nothing to do with mono race ??

    BS.

    Everything to do with it.

    Same with Japan, Korea and Germany
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Txi)
    China success nothing to do with mono race ??

    BS.

    Everything to do with it.

    Same with Japan, Korea and Germany
    Well, justify your argument
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ish90an)
    Only wannabe racists think race has anything to do with economic progress and exhibit their own ignorance of economics and history.
    I would advise you to stop posting and displaying your ignorance here, it is clear that you possess a very simplistic understanding of the world and economics and are carrying a massive chip on your shoulder, until you can actually educate yourself your arguments will be just as hollow as they have been proven to be so far.
    Only non-whites and self-hating whites come out with nonsense like this.

    We don't need you, we don't like you and we don't want you. We don't need you lecturing to us either. If our economy fails because you're not here, then so be it.

    Go away and leave us alone.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kyla2011)
    Well, justify your argument

    Self evident, all 4 are mono racial and are great successes, dumb dumb.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Txi)
    Self evident, all 4 are mono racial and are great successes, dumb dumb.
    Is that how you justify your argument? how narrow-minded!

    If China is really mono-racial today as you claim it, are they not mono-racial 70 years ago? At that time, they are in a ****-hole too. They can't even have a decent army to fight the Japanese in the Asian colonial times. Now, they have emerged as a Global superpower. Did they change from not being mono-racial to being mono-racial in the course of 70 years? NO! Same thing with Korea, only now that they became a developed country. So can you justify that being mono-racial is the reason for their developments? dumb, dumb....
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kyla2011)
    Is that how you justify your argument? how narrow-minded!

    If China is really mono-racial today as you claim it, are they not mono-racial 70 years ago? At that time, they are in a ****-hole too. They can't even have a decent army to fight the Japanese in the Asian colonial times. Now, they have emerged as a Global superpower. Did they change from not being mono-racial to being mono-racial in the course of 70 years? NO! Same thing with Korea, only now that they became a developed country. So can you justify that being mono-racial is the reason for their developments? dumb, dumb....

    well tough cause it's true !

    China has been a 1st world power 3 times previous to this, you dumb monkey.

    And it's the ONLY ancient civilization to remain unchanged since day 1.
 
 
 
Poll
How are you feeling in the run-up to Results Day 2018?
Useful resources

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.