# Algebra ManipulationWatch

#1
Hey guys, what have I done wrong here?

If then (provided b is not infinity), a must equal 0.

However, what if I multiplied it all by c.

Would I get

So this time ?

I take it this is because you just multiplied by c, which you are now saying is 0, so you are saying you multiplied it by 0?

Also, are you even "allowed" to multiply both sides by c? As one side the c will "stay" but on the RHS the c will just multiply with the 0 and disappear

Thanks.

P.S I did this when I had the following question:

I did

So again by multiplying this time by sinx, I get an extra solution of sinx = 0.

So I am guessing whenever you have something equals 0, then multiply by something else, you get an extra solution where that something else is 0?
0
7 years ago
#2
Why multiply by c? Just multiply by b, which will give you a = 0.

Also, with the original question, can you not just go from 1 = 4sin2x to sin(2x) = 1/4, solve for 2x and find x?
0
#3
(Original post by Bobifier)
Why multiply by c? Just multiply by b, which will give you a = 0.
I am not doing it for the right answer really: I am just wondering why you couldn't multiply it by something else.
0
7 years ago
#4
I don't think so; I think when you factorize something it means that one or the other expressions must equal 0 not necessarily both.
0
7 years ago
#5
(Original post by H3rrW4rum)
So again by multiplying this time by sinx, I get an extra solution of sinx = 0.
Yeah but sinx=0 isn't a valid solution
0
7 years ago
#6
(Original post by H3rrW4rum)
I am not doing it for the right answer really: I am just wondering why you couldn't multiply it by something else.
You could happily multiply it by something else, and get exactly the result you suggested. There is mathematically no problem with that. The only problem is that I'm not absolutely sure you would want to, I don't think you actually gain anything from doing so.

Also yes, watch out for sinx = 0, as others have pointed out.
0
#7
(Original post by Pheylan)
Yeah but sinx=0 isn't a valid solution
Why not?

EDIT: Just tried a -b = 0

Let a and b = 5.

So multiply by c again, which I am calling 3,

ac - bc = 0 ( 3x5 - 3x5 = 0)

c( a - b) = 0,

3( 5 - 5) = 0

a - b = 0, but c =/= 0.

So the thing you multiply it by won't be 0, as the original part was already 0?
0
7 years ago
#8
(Original post by H3rrW4rum)
Why not?
Because if you try to substitute it into the original equation, you get
0
7 years ago
#9
(Original post by H3rrW4rum)
Hey guys, what have I done wrong here?

If then (provided b is not infinity), a must equal 0.

However, what if I multiplied it all by c.

Would I get

So this time ?

I take it this is because you just multiplied by c, which you are now saying is 0, so you are saying you multiplied it by 0?

Also, are you even "allowed" to multiply both sides by c? As one side the c will "stay" but on the RHS the c will just multiply with the 0 and disappear

Thanks.
if you have a/b = 0 you can say a = 0
then if you want to multiply by c you have to do it both sides so you get ac/b = 0c
so basically c can be anything including 0
0
X

new posts
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### University open days

• Cranfield University
Cranfield Forensic MSc Programme Open Day Postgraduate
Thu, 25 Apr '19
• University of the Arts London
Open day: MA Footwear and MA Fashion Artefact Postgraduate
Thu, 25 Apr '19
• Cardiff Metropolitan University
Sat, 27 Apr '19

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### Have you registered to vote?

Yes! (377)
37.44%
No - but I will (77)
7.65%
No - I don't want to (71)
7.05%
No - I can't vote (<18, not in UK, etc) (482)
47.86%