(Original post by DamnBuster)
Whilst homosexuality may be natural, homosexuals having children isn't.
It is! Biologically, any man and a woman can reproduce like rabbits if they so wish, even if one or both of them is gay (just don't expect them to enjoy it much). It doesn't mean this same couple of biological parents have to raise the child.
Yeah, stop trying to make everyone happy.
Charming. OK then, let's get rid of the welfare state and the justice system and stuff, they're just time wasting things trying to give things to people who deserve them and are unlucky enough not to have them already.
I know I wouldn't have been the fine upstanding member of society that I am today if it hadn't been for having a loving mother AND father.
I wouldn't describe you as a perfectly fine upstanding member of society.
The fact is that it isn't natural for two men to have a baby so stop playing the 'equality card' as it is irrelevant to this discussion.
That fact that two men cannot have a baby with each other (in the current state of science) is irrelevent to this discussion. This is about parents and adopted children, after all.
(Original post by Blackadder)
They're not 'perfectly normal' - they are statistically more likely to be gay as well.
Who are you to judge what is 'perfectly normal' and what isn't? Also, statistics are *******s but even if what you say is true then what is its relevence? Good, I say.
Plus, I again bring up 1 parent families - a child lacks these influences and so is more likely to do worse in school, take drugs and commit crimes.
That is an incredibly generalised statement built on negative stereotypes.
Nature also gave us the intelligence to cure ourselves.
And indeed the intelligence to look beyond biology's crude requirements when forming enriching personal relationships. And the intelligence to develop ways to prevent unwanted pregancies. And when that fails, the intelligence to give loving homes to babies with no parents.