# Help with M1 question please?

Watch
Announcements
#1
A cyclist travelling with constant acceleration along a straight road, passes three points, A, B and C where AB=BC=20m. The speed of the cyclist at A is 8ms-1 and at B is 12ms-1. Find the speed of the cyclist at C.

I found out the acceleration and then cyclist making the displacement 40m??

Answer is 15 though, dno how to arrive at that..
0
9 years ago
#2
(Original post by Sparkzz)
A cyclist travelling with constant acceleration along a straight road, passes three points, A, B and C where AB=BC=20m. The speed of the cyclist at A is 8ms-1 and at B is 12ms-1. Find the speed of the cyclist at C.

I found out the acceleration and then cyclist making the displacement 40m??

Answer is 15 though, dno how to arrive at that..
Use to find the acceleration between A and B, where v=12, u=8 and s=20. You then put this acceleration back into the same formula to calculate v between A and C, where u=8, s=40 and a=whatever you calulated it to be.
0
9 years ago
#3
you said you found out the acceleration a which is such that
.
integrate once wrt t
(*), E an integration constant. This also gives you the velocity of the cyclist.
integrate wrt t again
where F is another integration constant

Without loss of generality say that x=0 when the cyclist is at A (so F=0), where he has (initially) speed 8, so substitute v=8 at t=0 in (*) to get that E=8.

Now put x=40 when the cyclist is at C, and thus 40=at^2/2+8t, and you can determine t when x=40.
Then put the t you just determined in (*) to get the speed at C.

1. My solution might not be the best, this is definitely not my field.
2. Maybe you're wondering why I haven't used the given speed at B. Well, you said you knew a, so I implicitly used this condition when I used the 'known' acceleration a.
0
9 years ago
#4
(Original post by Gemini92)
My long-winded solution blatantly avoids this very simple formula, definitely the best way to do this.
0
#5
(Original post by Gemini92)
Use to find the acceleration between A and B, where v=12, u=8 and s=20. You then put this acceleration back into the same formula to calculate v between A and C, where u=8, s=40 and a=whatever you calulated it to be.
I did that and got 19.6 :s
0
9 years ago
#6
(Original post by Sparkzz)
I did that and got 19.6 :s
That's strange, I got 15. What did you get as the acceleration?
0
#7
(Original post by Gemini92)
That's strange, I got 15. What did you get as the acceleration?
acceleration 2?

as the equation writes
144=64+40a
80=40a
a = 2?
0
9 years ago
#8
(Original post by Sparkzz)
acceleration 2?

as the equation writes
144=64+40a
80=40a
a = 2?
That's what I got. If you put that back into the same formula with u=8 and s=40, you should get v=15.
0
#9
(Original post by Gemini92)
That's what I got. If you put that back into the same formula with u=8 and s=40, you should get v=15.
oh yeh woops im so stupid, did s=80 lol thank u!!
0
2 years ago
#10
i got a =1 because it is 2 * a * 40 then solve it go find that a is 1
0
2 years ago
#11
(Original post by F1 GUJ)
i got a =1 because it is 2 * a * 40 then solve it go find that a is 1
No, we know the speeds at B and C, and the displacement from B to C is 20 m, so it's . Also, why did you bump a 7-year-old thread?
0
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### Do you have the space and resources you need to succeed in home learning?

Yes I have everything I need (324)
56.15%
I don't have everything I need (253)
43.85%