compulsory penis removal for all convicted peadophiles.

Watch
Poll: penis removal for peadophiles?
chop it off. (139)
45.72%
peadophiles have ahuman right to a penis. (165)
54.28%
humanrights
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 9 years ago
#1
peadophiles have very high reoffending rate and so penis ( and testicle) removal is one way of guaranteeing that they cannot molest or rape children as their sex drive is taken away.


chemical castration is not a guarantee because it is not permanent. jail time is not a guarantee because one day they will be released. execution although preferable for convicted peadophiles is opposed by many on secular religious grounds. so compulsery penis removal is the middle ground.


surely those who disagree secretly do so because they are potential peadophiles?
57
reply
Wednesday Bass
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#2
Report 9 years ago
#2
And female paedophiles?

Haven't quite thought this through, have we?
31
reply
Aj12
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#3
Report 9 years ago
#3
(Original post by Wednesday Bass)
And female paedophiles?
Some sort of Cork.
144
reply
pol pot noodles
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#4
Report 9 years ago
#4
How is removing someone's penis going to stop them murdering a child? You murder with your hands, not your penis.
2
reply
Wednesday Bass
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#5
Report 9 years ago
#5
(Original post by Aj12)
Some sort of Cork.
Please rate some other members before rating this member again.
3
reply
Dream Weaver
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#6
Report 9 years ago
#6
You're post is stupid, but:

(Original post by humanrights)
secular religious grounds.
yeah... want to try rephrasing that or something?
2
reply
Aj12
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#7
Report 9 years ago
#7
(Original post by Wednesday Bass)
Please rate some other members before rating this member again.
Its the thought that counts
0
reply
Krebs
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#8
Report 9 years ago
#8
I think you mean castration...


(Original post by pol pot noodles)
How is removing someone's penis going to stop them murdering a child? You murder with your hands, not your penis.
:confused:
3
reply
doloroushazy
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#9
Report 9 years ago
#9
But they can still molest kids with their hands? :/
2
reply
james22
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#10
Report 9 years ago
#10
While I agree with you, I don't think we could do this as it is against human rights, and once we start making exceptions it undermines the enire of human rights which i think must be kept to very rigourly so that people in at least most of the western world know what fundamental rights they wil always have, regardless of their circumstances.

Once we allow this people would campaign for similar punishments for lesser crimes and we hit a downward spiral.

Apart from that problem I would agree with you completely.
5
reply
humanrights
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#11
Report Thread starter 9 years ago
#11
peadophiles reoffend because of their sex drive which mainly comes from the sex hormones released from their testicles.


but to make sure, the full penis must be removed so they are not tempted to try and rekindle the old feelings.


personally, i think convicted child sex peadophiles should be executed, but i suggest penis removal as a middle ground.
4
reply
humanrights
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#12
Report Thread starter 9 years ago
#12
(Original post by pol pot noodles)
How is removing someone's penis going to stop them murdering a child? You murder with your hands, not your penis.
yes, i agree. i edited. i meant rape and murder if the penis was removed then the sex addiction would be gone. but, maybe they would retain the obsession if they were murderous anyway.
0
reply
whyumadtho
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#13
Report 9 years ago
#13
Molestation is not limited to penetrative sex by any means. :erm:
1
reply
humanrights
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#14
Report Thread starter 9 years ago
#14
(Original post by ApplePi)
If the hormones are realesed from the testicles then there's no point in just removing the penis....



well, i meant both. technically, i should have said both, but i think people know what i am getting at.
0
reply
HKDSP
Badges: 9
Rep:
?
#15
Report 9 years ago
#15
Wouldn't they just use their fingers?
0
reply
AboutAn8orA9
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#16
Report 9 years ago
#16
On this thinking, you'd probably have to chop off other body parts of theirs.
Such as hands.
0
reply
LadyRowena
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#17
Report 9 years ago
#17
I would not want to live in a state that had the power to cut people's genitals off, no matter how vile the criminal involved may be.

I suppose you agree with cutting thieves' hands off and other medieval forms of "justice"?
5
reply
humanrights
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#18
Report Thread starter 9 years ago
#18
i never knew there were so many peadophile lovers on tsr. 45% of the poll think peadophiles have a human right to a penis.


sick.
12
reply
Helpful_Charlie
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#19
Report 9 years ago
#19
Stay in school, and off the drugs, kid.
1
reply
humanrights
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#20
Report Thread starter 9 years ago
#20
(Original post by LadyRowena)
I would not want to live in a state that had the power to cut people's genitals off, no matter how vile the criminal involved may be.

I suppose you agree with cutting thieves' hands off and other medieval forms of "justice"?


no. thats just extreme.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Should there be a new university admissions system that ditches predicted grades?

No, I think predicted grades should still be used to make offers (640)
33.51%
Yes, I like the idea of applying to uni after I received my grades (PQA) (806)
42.2%
Yes, I like the idea of receiving offers only after I receive my grades (PQO) (378)
19.79%
I think there is a better option than the ones suggested (let us know in the thread!) (86)
4.5%

Watched Threads

View All