QE2 and deleveraging

Watch
This discussion is closed.
Markleberry
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 8 years ago
#1
So I just saw a very interesting comment here and I'm wondering what you lot think of it.

I myself would be too worried about perverse incentives, so I wouldn't go so far, and I certainly don't agree with writing down mortgage debt right now (maybe in a double-dip) but using it to bring down interest rates seems fine by me.

Discuss.
0
Quady
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#2
Report 8 years ago
#2
Why would any bank want to do that?

Especially publicly owned ones which would face a multi billion write down

0
Markleberry
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 8 years ago
#3
(Original post by Quady)
Why would any bank want to do that?

Especially publicly owned ones which would face a multi billion write down

I was focusing more on the fact that the QE spending could be used to create a personal debt holiday without any damage to the private banks, not the idiocy about writing it off.
0
creak
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#4
Report 8 years ago
#4
But doesn't Osborne's whole growth strategy (as much as you can call it that) rely on the public taking on ever-increasing amounts of debt?

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/201...gman&seid=auto
0
D.R.E
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#5
Report 8 years ago
#5
In 2011, it still surprises me that people pay attention to anything Ed Balls and particularly Paul Krugman have to say.
2
turn and fall
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#6
Report 8 years ago
#6
Good lord the comments and posts are just ridiculous.

All of them centre around the idea of getting the economy going. NO. We need to let the economy recover. If I hear another politician/academic talk about how to

KICK START THE ECONOMY

I am going to throw something at them.


The economy is not a car.
1
MagicNMedicine
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#7
Report 8 years ago
#7
(Original post by creak)
But doesn't Osborne's whole growth strategy (as much as you can call it that) rely on the public taking on ever-increasing amounts of debt?

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/201...gman&seid=auto
Yes and this is why you will notice Osborne and the Tories have gone quiet on the issue of "Britain being the most indebted society..." which was a big theme of theirs during 2009 and 2010. They were constantly saying that Labour had made Britain a nation of borrowers, in fact I remember Cameron saying in the 2009 Tory Party Conference that he wanted a Tory government to make Britain a nation "built on saving not borrowing".

What the OBR has now told them is that as part of their strategy for reducing government debt, we will see a huge increase in household debt - of course this may be easier to sell later on as they can attack households for 'reckless borrowing'.

But have no doubt about this - Britain's households will be far more indebted after 5 years of Tory government than they were under the Labour government, and Osborne knows this, which is why they have stopped criticising Labour for it.
0
Aphotic Cosmos
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#8
Report 8 years ago
#8
Sorry, we don't own the QE2 any more.

Image
0
Tawheed
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#9
Report 1 year ago
#9
QE2
0
RichPiana
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#10
Report 1 year ago
#10
(Original post by Tawheed)
QE2
This thread is 7 years old...
0
X
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

How are you feeling ahead of results day?

Very Confident (28)
8.31%
Confident (44)
13.06%
Indifferent (51)
15.13%
Unsure (82)
24.33%
Worried (132)
39.17%

Watched Threads

View All